Discussion Forum: Messages by Teup (6595)
Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full      Show Messages: All | Without Replies

View Thread Re: Why can't I enlarge pics anymore? - Teup (6595)
[...]
(58 months ago, Aug 13, 2019, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Either a bonafide brain-fart, or a seizure... - Teup (6595)
[...] You're here discussing its problems out of your own free will, who's silly now? :D
(58 months ago, Jul 26, 2019, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Either a bonafide brain-fart, or a seizure... - Teup (6595)
[...] Wow! :O Then my question changes... Why is this guy not selling any LEGO? :D
(58 months ago, Jul 26, 2019, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Either a bonafide brain-fart, or a seizure... - Teup (6595)
[...] I agree. But in all fairness we can't ignore the question in the back of our minds: When is this guy finally going to buy some more LEGO? :D
(58 months ago, Jul 26, 2019, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Either a bonafide brain-fart, or a seizure... - Teup (6595)
[...] I think it would rather be on an opt in basis, because doing it by default would be privacy violation. Reminds me of the trouble Amazon is in over looking into its sellers [...]
(58 months ago, Jul 25, 2019, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Plant 2417? - Teup (6595)
[...] I guess producing crude oil generates a lot of emissions. But I wonder how much less emissions their new production process really involves. I guess it kind of stands [...]
(58 months ago, Jul 24, 2019, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Plant 2417? - Teup (6595)
[...] It's the same plastic: Polyethylene. It's just made from fresh plants rather than from dinosaurs (oil). But it isn't biodegradable in any way and [...]
(58 months ago, Jul 23, 2019, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Have all members pay BL $1 to buy and/or sell - Teup (6595)
[...] I think you may be pretty exceptional in this. While you are right it could be a good decision to pay it, I think that the vast majority of people will not realize it [...]
(60 months ago, Jun 11, 2019, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Have all members pay BL $1 to buy and/or sell - Teup (6595)
[...] Agreed. It sounds absurdly consumer unfriendly and frankly hard to take seriously. Imagine going to the supermarket and being charged $1 upon entry that will not be refunded. [...]
(60 months ago, Jun 11, 2019, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Fair, safe and legal trading = BL principles - Teup (6595)
[...] Well, yes, you are right. The seller has to cancel when requested but is entitled to taking any measures they like. Especially since this Bricklink world is slightly [...]
(61 months ago, May 13, 2019, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Fair, safe and legal trading = BL principles - Teup (6595)
[...] I very much agree with your introduction, and I can't say I disagree with the rest, but to me the issue of customs delcarations seems really minor and anecdotal [...]
(61 months ago, May 13, 2019, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Coral - Teup (6595)
[...] Coral: What an unfortunate name for a colour. If there's one thing in the world that can have every colour imaginable... it's coral. But apparently that's [...]
(61 months ago, May 2, 2019, to Colors)
View Thread Re: Random Stockroom Items - Teup (6595)
[...] It's one of those persistent problems that Bricklink is trying to fix. I think something is really wrong in the bug fixing department, it seems their ability to isolate [...]
(61 months ago, Apr 22, 2019, to Inventories)
View Thread Re: What do the ! and * symbols mean under image? - Teup (6595)
[...] How is it confusing? Everybody knows that an asterisk is the symbol for "large" and an exclamation mark the universal symbol for 3D, right? Can't see why new users [...]
(61 months ago, Apr 20, 2019, to Inventories)
View Thread Re: Lengths in “L” and 18654 - Teup (6595)
[...] How can factual correctness be less important than a choice of how to categorise it? I'd say #1 is to get the facts straight, and after that, we can go and organise [...]
(61 months ago, Apr 17, 2019, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: inconsistencies - Teup (6595)
[...] Yeah... the fact that there's a variation that would span across categories if you take the groove as the defining factor, kind of kills that idea pretty effectively. [...]
(62 months ago, Apr 9, 2019, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: inconsistencies - Teup (6595)
[...] Exactly, the jumpers always seemed much more tile-like to me than that "tile". I guess the only relevant answer to this issue is: This was acknowledged by the previous [...]
(62 months ago, Apr 9, 2019, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Brickstock questions - Teup (6595)
[...] Well, I guess that's all true enough. Some take the priceguide as just a guide, some ignore it, some take it as some holy prescription. I tend to be kind of the latter [...]
(63 months ago, Feb 28, 2019, to Inventories)
View Thread Re: Brickstock questions - Teup (6595)
[...] Well.... it does. I'm just saying that the averge price that you see here in Bricklink is not equal to the average price in Brickstock. These do not match. Parting [...]
(63 months ago, Feb 28, 2019, to Inventories)
View Thread Re: Brickstock questions - Teup (6595)
[...] Brickstock prices are excluding VAT.. that is why I definitely recommend NOT using Brickstock for pricing if you are in the EU. You'll never be able to retrieve the [...]
(63 months ago, Feb 26, 2019, to Inventories)
View Thread Re: Fine print regarding lot quanities - Teup (6595)
[...] Sounds a bit like this store has the rule only in text without having the option enabled :/ In that case, I would just go ahead and place the order in that case, screw [...]
(63 months ago, Feb 21, 2019, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: We need a modern way to part out sets. - Teup (6595)
It doesn't work, because not all items have the same distribution globally. Some are prevalent in the VAT zone (closer to 20% difference with the BL priceguide), [...]
(63 months ago, Feb 20, 2019, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: We need a modern way to part out sets. - Teup (6595)
[...] Yep, Brickstock is US oriented so it works for you, not for us ;) Prices exclude VAT, so it renders it useless to me. I'd rather go through the Bricklink part [...]
(63 months ago, Feb 17, 2019, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: We need a modern way to part out sets. - Teup (6595)
[...] You're right, that issue of fees not being represented in search listings, enabling sellers to pretend they are cheap, must be one of the factors in the race to the [...]
(63 months ago, Feb 16, 2019, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: We need a modern way to part out sets. - Teup (6595)
[...] +1 That's a very good way to put it - it's at hobby level. Nothing more or less. This is why for all hobby users, Bricklink work fine and they are nothing but [...]
(63 months ago, Feb 16, 2019, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: We need a modern way to part out sets. - Teup (6595)
[...] Agreed. Actually, the system as it is is already working in your favour as a buyer - thee part out system being so poorly designed and unstable drives alot of sellers [...]
(63 months ago, Feb 16, 2019, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: We need a modern way to part out sets. - Teup (6595)
[...] You're completely right, it should have been redone many years ago. If you compare the wanted list part-out screen with the seller's part-out screen, it becomes [...]
(63 months ago, Feb 16, 2019, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Allow AFOLs to "Bricklink" the ADP sets - Teup (6595)
[...] They're still more official than BrickArms, which is also in the catalog... Plus, the whole "exciting" part about the whole project, according to BL itself, is the [...]
(64 months ago, Feb 12, 2019, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Parting out - Teup (6595)
[...] Aha, it's because of remark based sorting.. I've never tried it and never know how it really works. I always assumed people use software to generate the locations [...]
(64 months ago, Jan 27, 2019, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Feedback removal - Teup (6595)
[...] I must agree with what the others have said... you see what you pay, you can agree or disagree. I don't see why your stance would shift from agree to disagree if [...]
(64 months ago, Jan 24, 2019, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Parting out - Teup (6595)
[...] Perhaps you can change the way you work, because in my routine this is absolutely no problem, and it's unlikely that Bricklink will change or upgrade anything.
(65 months ago, Jan 15, 2019, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Request official BrickLink app - Teup (6595)
[...] It's still a work in progress I think and it will be released at some point when Bricklink feels like it. But until they will add payment methods other than PayPal [...]
(65 months ago, Jan 9, 2019, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: New Part Category - Teup (6595)
[...] That's a nice idea, thanks! And don't have to move anything around in my alphabetical storage either :)
(65 months ago, Jan 7, 2019, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Move header buttons to the left side screen - Teup (6595)
[...] This still annoys me every single day but probably won't ever be fixed? I need to choose between zooming down 30% from how I'd like to view the site and stare [...]
(65 months ago, Dec 26, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Coupons improvement - Teup (6595)
[...] You're not using instant checkout, so what you could do is mail an advertisement to your store mailing list and tell them that you'll apply a discount if they [...]
(66 months ago, Dec 12, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Automatic price while listing items - Teup (6595)
[...] They do, but they won't do anything.
(66 months ago, Dec 5, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: 40292 minifig error - Teup (6595)
[...] Well, I actually agree with yorbrick the "boy" should be added to the catalog. I understand the Bricklink catalog follows the instructions and that is a good and smart [...]
(66 months ago, Dec 4, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: 40292 minifig error - Teup (6595)
[...] I guess if dad really is a hairdresser or fashion designer, the girl's hair could be even better :D
(66 months ago, Dec 4, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: 40292 minifig error - Teup (6595)
[...] :O Haha that's crazy, seems the person making the instructions made the mistake. I guess Bricklink follows the instructions and not the box, so probably it should [...]
(66 months ago, Dec 4, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread 40292 minifig error - Teup (6595)
(Set 40292-1) LOL, so the Christmas giftset 40292 has a male and a female hairpiece so that the child can be a boy or a girl (and they're both on the box). But someone [...]
(66 months ago, Dec 4, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Something I Just Threw Together - Teup (6595)
I think "figures" is good, as in my understanding of English it refers more to physical shape than "characters". "Characters" I expect to be animate, while the category also [...]
(66 months ago, Nov 26, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Part out value may not always be accurate - Teup (6595)
[...] Agreed. And then there's VAT.... Even if Bricklink would have only 1 store, that store could still find itself in a race to the bottom. They list things, some sell [...]
(66 months ago, Nov 23, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Projectile Launcher - Teup (6595)
[...] Ok yeah.. that one is weird.. I didn't think about these :) But not a slope either, just the most random shape ever.. I would say Wedge or Vehicle... Same for [...]
(66 months ago, Nov 21, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Projectile Launcher - Teup (6595)
[...] But do you know that all the ones in Brick,Modified have a circular curve and the ones in slope all have an arbitrary curve? Maybe that helps telling them apart. The [...]
(66 months ago, Nov 21, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Projectile Launcher - Teup (6595)
[...] Well, I think there's a fairly clear-cut difference between shooters that shoot existing parts and shooters that have specifically designed projectiles for them. [...]
(66 months ago, Nov 21, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Projectile Launcher - Teup (6595)
[...] To me Brick,Modified vs Slope,Curved is absolutely fine. I never have any doubts or troubles with it. Brick,Round is round in the XY dimension, Brick,Modified is round [...]
(66 months ago, Nov 21, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Projectile Launcher - Teup (6595)
[...] Thanks, ok, that makes sense - then my list is just for future reference :) Personally I'd propose including the projectiles into the category, whenever at least [...]
(66 months ago, Nov 21, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Projectile Launcher - Teup (6595)
So.. what's the deal with the Projectile Launcher category? Currently has one item: (Part 15301c01) I proposed this category so various shooters can be grouped together, [...]
(66 months ago, Nov 21, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Mark a buyer as "Refunded due to non-arrival" - Teup (6595)
[...] I don't know about legal but BrickOwl has it and I think it's quite useful. If it's not legal, it could at the least be recorded internally and scammers could [...]
(67 months ago, Nov 12, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Mark a buyer as "Refunded due to non-arrival" - Teup (6595)
[...] It's again one of those features that BrickOwl has but Bricklink probably never will because of lack of development. I would vote yes, but I've been doing that [...]
(67 months ago, Nov 11, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Second Catalog Project Underway - Teup (6595)
[...] Wow. LEGO has produced so much peripheral rubbish :D I wouldn't like to be in your shoes with all of that, seems daunting. I agree, better to focus on items that [...]
(67 months ago, Nov 5, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Second Catalog Project Underway - Teup (6595)
[...] Now I'm confused, I thought this beehive shape is a cartoonesque representation of bee/wasp nest in trees (that actually look like this)? Or are they like [...]
(67 months ago, Nov 4, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Second Catalog Project Underway - Teup (6595)
[...] Oh, I didn't realise they were used like that. I still think it should be at Animal,Accessory, because if you are going to categorise on shape, then you might as [...]
(67 months ago, Nov 4, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Second Catalog Project Underway - Teup (6595)
Mostly positive changes, thanks for the update. I am sorry but...reeeeaally people..... the beehive.... noooooo :P Please think about it. If a SPIDER-WEB is Animal,Accessory [...]
(67 months ago, Nov 4, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Second Catalog Project Underway - Teup (6595)
[...] Then I would need to write remarks for each and every lot. I have frequently discussed category sorting vs remark sorting, and I just really do not believe that remark [...]
(67 months ago, Nov 4, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Second Catalog Project Underway - Teup (6595)
[...] Thanks for taking note, that sounds reasonable. I guess my point is that there's correcting the catalog and reimagining the catalog, and as long as we stay with the [...]
(67 months ago, Nov 4, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Second Catalog Project Underway - Teup (6595)
[...] Take this as just one vote, but that's taking it too far for me. I'm ok with the Energy Effect category and believe it's an improvement. But moving such large [...]
(67 months ago, Nov 4, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Catalog Project Request "Bar" vs. "Weapon" - Teup (6595)
[...] I also know where everything is, but I think it's not the point. A pilot can fly an aircraft with a broken auto pilot, but it doesn't mean auto pilot doesn't [...]
(67 months ago, Nov 2, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Second Catalog Project Underway - Teup (6595)
[...] [...] No, I don't see this at all.. Animal,Accessory! :) [...] Yes, findability for buyers is the number 1 concern but I just want to add that as a seller [...]
(67 months ago, Nov 1, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Catalog Project Request "Bar" vs. "Weapon" - Teup (6595)
[...] Yeah, that makes sense. I think if you look at the stats, by now, both are most commonly used as bars. Besides, I feel like it's more elegant to view it as a general [...]
(67 months ago, Nov 1, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Catalog Project Request "Bar" vs. "Weapon" - Teup (6595)
[...] And since we are talking about virtual items, it is of course entirely possible for things to be in two separate systems at once. One classic catalog that the existing [...]
(67 months ago, Nov 1, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Catalog Project Request "Bar" vs. "Weapon" - Teup (6595)
[...] Yes, I do agree when it is about inconsistencies - of course I'm willing to relearn those. I just hope that things will not be completely revamped when they're [...]
(67 months ago, Nov 1, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Catalog Project Request "Bar" vs. "Weapon" - Teup (6595)
[...] Ok, thanks for explaining. It is probably a good thing some things are revisited, but - a bit ahead of time but better now than later - I very much like to cast the "if [...]
(67 months ago, Oct 31, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Catalog Project Request "Bar" vs. "Weapon" - Teup (6595)
[...] As far as I can see this part is not a weapon, and I can't find it even once used as a hollow hammer. It only appears in brick-built weapons where it features alongside [...]
(67 months ago, Oct 31, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Catalog Project Request "Bar" vs. "Weapon" - Teup (6595)
[...] Is the part reclassifications project going to affect many parts? My shop is category based so if there is going to be major movement going on it would be good to have [...]
(67 months ago, Oct 31, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Another New Catalog Thing - Teup (6595)
[...] (Part 2343) Exists with and without ring at the bottom, as is already described. Looks like you can already expand the list using info that's already currently in [...]
(67 months ago, Oct 28, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Price guide improvement - Teup (6595)
[...] Sorry if this came up before and I missed it, I just can't spot it right now.. anyway.. not to be annoying but to me the million dollar question is why actually do [...]
(67 months ago, Oct 25, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: We have a new Catalog Admin! - Teup (6595)
[...] Congratulations StormChaser! From what I saw on the forum you must be very dedicated and I am sure we all owe you alot. I also tend to agree with your general opinions [...]
(67 months ago, Oct 25, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Price guide improvement - Teup (6595)
[...] I thought current items for sale were all displayed using the exchange rate of this moment. Why is it that important though if the exchange rate would be an hour older? [...]
(67 months ago, Oct 24, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Inventory Change Request for Set 10404-1 - Teup (6595)
Please make changes to the following inventory: (Set 10404-1) * Change 2 Part {Magenta to Dark Pink} 24866 Plate, Round 1 x 1 with Flower Edge (5 Petals) * Change 1 Part [...]
(67 months ago, Oct 23, 2018, to Inventories Requests)
View Thread Re: Note to seller is not very good - Teup (6595)
[...] That's a good idea I think. On the internet we are kind of programmed to completely disregard mumbo jumbo at the bottom of pages (like "© 2018 BrickLink Limited. [...]
(68 months ago, Oct 13, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Note to seller is not very good - Teup (6595)
[...] [...] Well, how do you know you packed all your orders correctly? Just a feeling, you never know for sure of course if it comes to actual evidence. But as soon as I [...]
(68 months ago, Oct 13, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Note to seller is not very good - Teup (6595)
[...] You mean just as a "regarding order ..." message and not attached to the order itself? In that case, no! I don't process orders and read messages at the same time. [...]
(68 months ago, Oct 12, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Restrictions kill sales! I'm outta here! - Teup (6595)
[...] (URL)
(68 months ago, Oct 5, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Restrictions kill sales! I'm outta here! - Teup (6595)
So, you are saying it is difficult. We're talking about sellers here, people who decide that they can handle selling Lego. Not every person who signs up on Bricklink has [...]
(68 months ago, Oct 5, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Restrictions kill sales! I'm outta here! - Teup (6595)
[...] And I think on the seller's side of the interface, it should also warn that not all weight/volume/value/country combinations are covered. I think it's the sellers [...]
(68 months ago, Oct 5, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Restrictions kill sales! I'm outta here! - Teup (6595)
[...] A size restriction sounds ridiculous, I never saw that... How can a buyer possibly anticipate this? There's no way of knowing how big your order is going to be, [...]
(68 months ago, Oct 5, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: 90-percentile as new average price ? - Teup (6595)
[...] This suggestion comes up now and then, I am not in favour, as it makes the priceguide less transparent but most of all it promotes the race to the bottom even more. In [...]
(68 months ago, Oct 1, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Request for addition in checkout process - Teup (6595)
[...] I don't actually understand this suggestion and explanation. Seems it's about low lot values again, what exactly is not satisfactory about the minimum order and [...]
(69 months ago, Sep 3, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: New parameter for lots: max per buyer - Teup (6595)
Yes, that is correct. In a world with unlimited stock everyone could buy as much as they like without limitations :) When I upload a part-out there are always a few lots [...]
(69 months ago, Sep 1, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: New parameter for lots: max per buyer - Teup (6595)
[...] You're right it would take a bit of extra infrastructure. But I think if items would be hidden (or quantity substracted) to buyers who have an order that [...]
(69 months ago, Sep 1, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: New parameter for lots: max per buyer - Teup (6595)
[...] You're right about that. Though I don't think it's really a problem that the quanitity would change - right now prices also change when you log in, because [...]
(69 months ago, Aug 31, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: New parameter for lots: max per buyer - Teup (6595)
Funny you should say that, I logged on to BO just now and found that a Chinese guy has bought out 2 lots :D Now my store offers round 1x1 plates in all colours except trans clear [...]
(69 months ago, Aug 31, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: New parameter for lots: max per buyer - Teup (6595)
[...] So I guess alot of the concern is remedied if what's left in stock really is invisible. That way, you can hardly blame a store for not selling it any more than you [...]
(69 months ago, Aug 31, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: New parameter for lots: max per buyer - Teup (6595)
[...] No, it should not be visible anywhere, just like a stockroom items is not visible. If I have a lot of 5000 but limit it to 500 per buyer, it should show as a 500 size [...]
(69 months ago, Aug 31, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: New parameter for lots: max per buyer - Teup (6595)
[...] So you leave the field 0 :D
(69 months ago, Aug 31, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: New parameter for lots: max per buyer - Teup (6595)
[...] I agree, you should not see it. It would work exactly the same as the stockroom currently works: You don't see what's back there that you cannot order. The shop [...]
(69 months ago, Aug 30, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: New parameter for lots: max per buyer - Teup (6595)
[...] You're making it sound like this option will force you to do certain things, but that's not the case at all. You are free to buy wherever you like and if a seller [...]
(69 months ago, Aug 30, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: New parameter for lots: max per buyer - Teup (6595)
[...] Buyers are always limited in what they can buy. A buyer won't see the difference between a seller offering their stock in doses and a seller who does not have alot [...]
(69 months ago, Aug 30, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: New parameter for lots: max per buyer - Teup (6595)
[...] You have some good points and I agree they need to be addressed in some way should this feature ever make it to implementation. You're right the priceguide for current [...]
(69 months ago, Aug 30, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: New parameter for lots: max per buyer - Teup (6595)
[...] But at least you will have 10 buyers rather than 1 :)
(69 months ago, Aug 30, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: New parameter for lots: max per buyer - Teup (6595)
[...] Exactly, when I have plenty of them in grays, black and white, I have alot of buyers for them, but then sooner or later there's always that guy who buys them all [...]
(69 months ago, Aug 30, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: New parameter for lots: max per buyer - Teup (6595)
[...] I think it is actually quite common practise for sellers who are not looking to really get rid of their store to sometimes keep some items in stockroom and not offer [...]
(69 months ago, Aug 30, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread New parameter for lots: max per buyer - Teup (6595)
I would really like to see a new parameter for lots that limits the amount a buyer can buy of a certain part in any one order. The part would then turn up in search results and [...]
(69 months ago, Aug 30, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Ability to Sort Inventory by Total Size - Teup (6595)
[...] It would easily be possible for the system to sort according to volume. All volumes of all parts are either know or estimated, as they are being used by instant checkout [...]
(69 months ago, Aug 28, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: Crappy pictures for similar parts. - Teup (6595)
[...] I also like it alot when there are are pictures showing the difference, and I think everyone does. But that's far from always the case, and that's just the way [...]
(69 months ago, Aug 28, 2018, to Catalog)
View Thread Re: Differentiate in SALES - Teup (6595)
[...] It could be a good idea, reminds me of my suggestion for an American subforum besides the language specific fora as I often find myself ending up in threads that I have [...]
(70 months ago, Aug 18, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: need new filter function for this website - Teup (6595)
[...] "NEUTRAL - canceled. due to paypal being frustrating. not sellers fault." So you don't blame the seller after all? Why then neutral? You fail to pay for the order, [...]
(70 months ago, Aug 9, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: need new filter function for this website - Teup (6595)
[...] Besides, I don't really understand this course of action in general, I'd say either you don't care, in which case you do nothing, or you care, in which case [...]
(70 months ago, Aug 9, 2018, to Suggestions)
View Thread Re: need new filter function for this website - Teup (6595)
[...] There is absolutely no relationship between the way you are redirected to PayPal and whether or not the seller pays fees. Fees are paid over all non-cancelled orders. [...]
(70 months ago, Aug 9, 2018, to Suggestions)

Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More