Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Re: Catalog Guidelines: Minifig Heads - StormChaser (566) | [...] Is it too much to ask that we keep this all in one thread where I can easily reference it? I don't mind reposting everyone's replies to the original thread and [...]
(65 months ago, Jan 7, 2019, to Catalog) |
| New Part Category - StormChaser (566) | Today I added a new category: Wheel, Accessory. I moved 31 parts from Wheel to the new category.
(65 months ago, Jan 6, 2019, to Catalog) |
| Re: Overwatch Mercy & Pharah pictures wrong - StormChaser (566) | [...] Everything else is good. Just to be clear, the fact that figures were incorrectly added to the catalog was no one's fault other than my own. My job is to check things [...]
(65 months ago, Jan 3, 2019, to Catalog) |
| Re: part 4073: catalog statisics mistake - StormChaser (566) | [...] That is odd. I cannot explain it. I thought the statistics were real-time data. Even if not, I don't see any recent changes which could have caused this discrepancy.
(65 months ago, Jan 3, 2019, to Catalog) |
| Re: Admin Russell, what's with the images? - StormChaser (566) | [...] Agreed and thank you for bringing it up. It could be human error since I approved some of the images you mention. I'm sure Russell will shed some light on the issue.
(65 months ago, Jan 2, 2019, to Catalog) |
| Re: Admin Russell, what's with the images? - StormChaser (566) | [...] Russell would indeed be the person to answer this, but in many cases it comes down to the way the system is designed. On this, for example: (Part 970c86pb02) The legacy [...]
(65 months ago, Jan 2, 2019, to Catalog) |
| Re: Sixth Catalog Project Underway - StormChaser (566) | An anonymous person would like the following information added for review: The additional note for (Set yoda-1) is too bloated since most of that information is included in the [...]
(65 months ago, Jan 1, 2019, to Catalog) |
| Re: 2 versions of dino tail end #40379 - StormChaser (566) | [...] If you'll post a comparison picture, then I'll add an additional note to the part mentioning the difference and also add this part to our list of known variants.
(65 months ago, Jan 1, 2019, to Catalog) |
| Re: Issue with New Minifig sw988 - StormChaser (566) | [...] I did not title this figure. The person who titled the figure was a person who had the figure in hand to see what the face actually looks like. Titles can easily be [...]
(65 months ago, Jan 1, 2019, to Catalog) |
| Re: Issue with New Minifig sw988 - StormChaser (566) | [...] These are pending and have been for some time: (Minifigure sw986) (Minifigure sw987) (Minifigure sw988) What needs to happen is that someone needs to upload pictures [...]
(65 months ago, Jan 1, 2019, to Catalog) |
| Re: Different size for Watches parts bbw002 - StormChaser (566) | [...] If we're talking about proof, then the only proof would be to measure and weigh the actual item from 2013. Measuring/weighing your item and then changing the dimensions/weight [...]
(65 months ago, Dec 31, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: Different size for Watches parts bbw002 - StormChaser (566) | [...] [...] [...] I've changed the topic of your post from Catalog Requests to Catalog. The requests topic is for when you're making a specific request that something [...]
(65 months ago, Dec 31, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: 93273pb089 deletion - StormChaser (566) | [...] I've changed your post to the Catalog topic since the Catalog Requests topic is for me to change something in the catalog. This pending part is not yet in the catalog. [...]
(65 months ago, Dec 31, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: Please approve new sets - StormChaser (566) | [...] This is not a new policy, by the way. It has been around for a long time: (URL) For the sets you mention, some will be available on the LEGO shop website tomorrow and [...]
(65 months ago, Dec 25, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: Please approve new sets - StormChaser (566) | [...] Many or all of those sets have been available for a while in varying locales. Nevertheless, we are trying to maintain a quality relationship with the LEGO Group and [...]
(65 months ago, Dec 25, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: Does this count as a catalog entry? - StormChaser (566) | [...] Submit the set it as a catalog entry, please. I see no problem with approving it and its figures as catalog entries. Make up a set number and I'll modify as necessary. [...]
(65 months ago, Dec 24, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: New Relationship Catalog Project Underway - StormChaser (566) | [...] It does. However, this item relationship match is not capable of handling complex relationships consisting of all the parts with which an individual part will fit and [...]
(65 months ago, Dec 24, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: Does this count as a catalog entry? - StormChaser (566) | [...] I don't see any figs in that package. As for whether it would count as a set, you say they were all prepackaged? Were the contents of all of them identical? If [...]
(65 months ago, Dec 24, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: BA43pb02 marked for deletion? - StormChaser (566) | [...] Yes, you're right. For some reason I thought those were: (Part 2420) and I was adding in the red plate below. [...] If you look at the existing sticker over assembly [...]
(65 months ago, Dec 24, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: New Relationship Catalog Project Underway - StormChaser (566) | [...] Yes, I like it. Thanks! So, my original version: Shows parts that naturally fit together which are designed to work together and which are nearly always used together [...]
(65 months ago, Dec 23, 2018, to Catalog) |
| New Relationship Catalog Project Underway - StormChaser (566) | We have long needed a relationship match that shows items which fit together and which are frequently used together. I have asked for this type of match in the past and have [...]
(65 months ago, Dec 23, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: BA43pb02 marked for deletion? - StormChaser (566) | [...] No. It just means that the assembly must include enough parts to be solid and not be held together merely by the sticker. Look at this example: (Part BA47pb02) The [...]
(65 months ago, Dec 23, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: BA43pb02 marked for deletion? - StormChaser (566) | [...] [...] I've added an additional note to this item explaining why it was marked for deletion: (Part BA43pb02) Feel free to submit a new catalog entry for a similar [...]
(65 months ago, Dec 23, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: Is there actually a 3626bpx28? UPDATE - StormChaser (566) | [...] No, there is not. Thank you for researching this and bringing it to my attention and to axaday for contacting sellers and to JulieK and baylit for responding with here [...]
(65 months ago, Dec 22, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: Is there actually a 3626bpx28? - StormChaser (566) | [...] Sorry, didn't realize it was an attempt at humor. I've been getting some occasionally unfriendly feedback of late and thus I've tended to assume things are [...]
(65 months ago, Dec 20, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: Is there actually a 3626bpx28? - StormChaser (566) | [...] This is not ignoring it: (URL) I will paraphrase what I said in that message: If it's wrong, then let's fix it. But first, let's make sure it's wrong [...]
(65 months ago, Dec 20, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: Is there actually a 3626bpx28? - StormChaser (566) | [...] I don't consider the original source for the inventory of the figure to have been reliable at all. I'm sure we carried these parts over from other websites and [...]
(65 months ago, Dec 20, 2018, to Catalog) |
| Re: Extra Parts classification change? - StormChaser (566) | Sorry to keep posting. I should've figured out everything I wanted to say first. I also should have invested in Tesla stock (about 3,200 shares would have done it) [...]
(65 months ago, Dec 20, 2018, to Catalog) |
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
