Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Author: | primadeluxe | Posted: | Nov 29, 2020 07:12 | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 5561-1 | Viewed: | 19 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 2 Part 2362a White Panel 1 x 2 x 3 - Solid Studs (Alternate)
Comments from Submitter:
Orginal build set
|
|
Author: | primadeluxe | Posted: | Jul 12, 2020 02:31 | Subject: | Re: With and without groove in one set | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| All of them are with groove. I made a change request as you asked.
In Catalog, randyf writes:
| In Catalog, primadeluxe writes:
| OK, thanks to you all. So if I read it right, I should submit two red 44301a
as regular and two red 44301b as alternate and delete the two red 44301?
|
Yes, that is correct.
Could you also check and change the undetermined black hinge plates in the set?
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
|
Author: | primadeluxe | Posted: | Jul 12, 2020 02:23 | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 4203-1 | Viewed: | 23 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 2 Part 44301a Black Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 1 Finger On End with Bottom Groove
* Add 2 Part 44302a Black Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 2 Fingers on End and 9 Teeth with Bottom Groove
* Delete 2 Part 44301 Black Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 1 Finger On End (Undetermined Type)
* Delete 2 Part 44302 Black Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 2 Fingers on End (Undetermined Type)
Comments from Submitter:
Pulled from a sealed set
|
|
Author: | primadeluxe | Posted: | Jul 11, 2020 02:51 | Subject: | Re: With and without groove in one set | Viewed: | 24 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Submitted the changes for the red 44301. I shall have a look at the black 44301
and 44302.
In Catalog, randyf writes:
| In Catalog, primadeluxe writes:
| OK, thanks to you all. So if I read it right, I should submit two red 44301a
as regular and two red 44301b as alternate and delete the two red 44301?
|
Yes, that is correct.
Could you also check and change the undetermined black hinge plates in the set?
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
|
Author: | primadeluxe | Posted: | Jul 11, 2020 02:49 | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 4203-1 | Viewed: | 22 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 2 Part 44301a Red Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 1 Finger On End with Bottom Groove
* Add 2 Part 44301b Red Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 1 Finger On End without Bottom Groove (Alternate)
* Delete 2 Part 44301 Red Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 1 Finger On End (Undetermined Type)
Comments from Submitter:
Pulled from a sealed set
|
|
Author: | primadeluxe | Posted: | Jul 11, 2020 02:40 | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 1610-2 | Viewed: | 23 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part BA208pb01 White Stickered Assembly 6 x 2 with Black 'Martinair' Pattern on Both Sides (Stickers) - Set 1610-2 - 2 Plates 1 x 2, 1 Plate 2 x 6, 1 Plate, Modified 2 x 2 with Wheel Holder Bottom and Red Wheel wi (Counterpart)
|
|
Author: | primadeluxe | Posted: | Jul 11, 2020 02:38 | Subject: | Re: With and without groove in one set | Viewed: | 24 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| OK, thanks to you all. So if I read it right, I should submit two red 44301a
as regular and two red 44301b as alternate and delete the two red 44301?
In Catalog, paulvdb writes:
| In Catalog, primadeluxe writes:
| In a sealed set 4203 I found the red 44301 with and without groove. Is it normal
to have different variations of one part in one set? Should it be noted or is
the Undetermined Type in the inventory enough?
|
As others already mentioned, this is common with some part variants if borh were
in production at the same time. In such a case one of the variants should be
in the inventory as a regular and the other as an alternate.
Undetermined parts should be eliminated from inventories if we have evidence
for one or more specific variants in a set.
|
|
|
Author: | primadeluxe | Posted: | Jul 10, 2020 08:41 | Subject: | With and without groove in one set | Viewed: | 87 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
|
| In a sealed set 4203 I found the red 44301 with and without groove. Is it normal
to have different variations of one part in one set? Should it be noted or is
the Undetermined Type in the inventory enough?
|
|
Author: | primadeluxe | Posted: | Jul 10, 2020 03:36 | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 1610-2 | Viewed: | 19 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part BA207pb01 White Stickered Assembly 5 x 1 x 3 with Red Martinair Logo Pattern on Both Sides (Stickers) - Set 1610-2 - 1 Plate 1 x 1, 1 Plate 1 x 2, 1 Brick 1 x 1, 2 Slope 45 2 x 1, 2 Slope, Inverted 45 2 x 1 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part BA206pb01 White Stickered Assembly 8 x 2 x 2/3 with Black 'PH-MAH' Pattern on Both Sides (Stickers) - Set 1610-2 - 1 Plate 2 x 2, 1 Plate 2 x 8, 1 Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud without Groove (Jumper& (Counterpart)
|
|
Author: | primadeluxe | Posted: | Jul 10, 2020 03:33 | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 1611-2 | Viewed: | 19 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part BA204pb01 White Stickered Assembly 6 x 1 x 2 with Red Martinair Logo Pattern on Both Sides (Stickers) - Set 1611-2 - 1 Plate 1 x 1, 1 Plate 1 x 2, 1 Plate 1 x 3, 1 Slope 45 2 x 1, 2 Slope, Inverted 45 2 x 1 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part BA205pb01 White Stickered Assembly 8 x 2 x 2/3 with Black 'PH-MAH' Pattern on Both Sides (Stickers) - Set 1611-2 - 1 Plate 2 x 3, 1 Plate 2 X 8 (Counterpart)
* Add 1 Part BA203pb01 White Stickered Assembly 16 x 2 x 2/3 with Black 'Martinair Holland' Pattern on Both Sides (Stickers) - Set 1611-2 - 3 Plates 2 x 8 (Counterpart)
|
|
Author: | primadeluxe | Posted: | Jul 10, 2020 03:23 | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 1552-2 | Viewed: | 23 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part BA202pb01 White Stickered Assembly 12 x 2 x 1 1/3 with Black 'STERLING' Pattern on Both Sides (Stickers) - Set 1552-2 - 1 Plate 2 x 4, 1 Plate 2 x 8, 2 Bricks 2 x 4 with Plane Windows 8 in Thin Red Stripe (Counterpart)
|
|
Author: | primadeluxe | Posted: | Jul 9, 2020 06:45 | Subject: | Re: Brick 3001oldpb03 with LUFTHANSA | Viewed: | 31 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Yeah, I thought so! But just checking as I am affraid to replace the stickers
and damage them.
The bricks who are not according to the instructions and I remember, are indeed
marked for deletion. How can I put a part as marked for deletion? In this case:
3009pb213
In Catalog, BricksThatStick writes:
| In Catalog, primadeluxe writes:
| I have one brick 3001oldpb03 with on both sides a LUFTHANSA stickers from set
1560, but according to the instructions the stickers had to be on two bricks
3001oldpb03. Is it possible to submit the one brick as a part only and not submit
it to the inventory of set 1560?
|
Stickered parts should only be accepted if they are exactly as show in the instructions.
So in this case it would need to be as a special assembly I'm afraid.
In the past they may have been accepted due to stickered assemblies not being
accepted so it was the next best thing at the time.
| I have seen some bricks of sets which were not according to the instructions,
but left in the catalog (of course not in the inventory of the set), like 3009pb213.
|
It's just not been marked for deletion (yet ) - if you know of any others
let us know
|
|
|
Author: | primadeluxe | Posted: | Jul 9, 2020 05:32 | Subject: | Brick 3001oldpb03 with LUFTHANSA | Viewed: | 68 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
|
| I have one brick 3001oldpb03 with on both sides a LUFTHANSA stickers from set
1560, but according to the instructions the stickers had to be on two bricks
3001oldpb03. Is it possible to submit the one brick as a part only and not submit
it to the inventory of set 1560?
I have seen some bricks of sets which were not according to the instructions,
but left in the catalog (of course not in the inventory of the set), like 3009pb213.
Please advice!
|
|
Author: | primadeluxe | Posted: | Jul 8, 2020 05:28 | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 1552-2 | Viewed: | 29 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part bb0096pb04 White Tail Vintage with Sterling Logo Pattern on Both Sides and Black Dot on Rear (Sticker) - Set 1552-2 (Counterpart)
|
|
Author: | primadeluxe | Posted: | Jul 6, 2020 06:13 | Subject: | Re: Smooth Slopes | Viewed: | 48 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Also there are slopes which have a smooth variation which are not in the catalog,
like 3045. Besides that, where is the end? I could easely point out slopes with
'very rough' surface or allmost smooth. But I think a note should be
added for each slope with variation, because building sets from the 70's
with smooth slopes is not very nice. With a note a buyer can allways ask the
seller for a variation.
In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
| [P=30474]
[P=3048b]
[P=3046b]
[P=3037b]
[P=3684b]
We're considering eliminating separate catalog entries for smooth slopes
for a number of different reasons and are seeking feedback from the community
on the decision. This change would primarily effect the five catalog entries
shown above.
Please share your thoughts.
|
|
|
Author: | primadeluxe | Posted: | Jul 2, 2020 05:32 | Subject: | Re: Number bricks: which is which | Viewed: | 22 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| I have submitted all my thoughts into changes for brick number 9. If approved
and entered these changes also apply for the other numbers!
In Catalog Identification, primadeluxe writes:
| Recap see picture!
In Catalog Identification, primadeluxe writes:
| To come back on the serif numbered bricks (3005pt{number}s) the variations in
print are due to the material (CA, ABS) and the mold pip (edge, side):
1. CA with old logo and edge mold pip (around 1958-1963). Old logo is wide straight.
2. ABS with old logo and edge mold pip (around 1963-1968). Old logo is wide round.
3. ABS with modern logo and side mold pip (around 1968-......)
See pictures.
This also explains the variantion in the print, which are in all the 3 cases
embossed. The 3005pt{number} is also embossed and the 3005pt{number}b has a surface
print.
In Catalog Identification, primadeluxe writes:
| Within the serif numbered bricks (3005pt{number}s) I found also some difference
in the print. See picture. For example number 6: right in the picture has an
old logo on the stud and the two on the left have modern and old logo on the
stud, but I think this are just variations.
So maybe a reshuffle of the images, variantions and sets appearing is in order.
Also looking at set 237, because the bold numbered bricks could not be a alternate
for this set. The bold numbers all have a modern logo (1968) and yet in 1966
the set 237 (1960) was replaced by set 437. So the bold numbered bricks could
be a alternate for set 437, but not for set 237.
In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| I think the serif number bricks (3005pt{number}s) should be appear in the 3 sets
487, 437 and 237 and not the ones which are know appearing (3005pt{number}).
Looking at the pictures of these sets, it would make sence, also because the
serif bricks have both the modern logo (appears in 1968) and old logo (appears
in 1958) on the studs.
The number bricks of my picture only have the modern logo on the stud and from
which sets they are I do not know. I have looked at a lot of pictures of sets
with numbered bricks, but did not find one with the bricks on my picture. So
they could easely be the 3005pt{number} bricks.
In Help, hpoort writes:
| In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| The images in the inventory of part 3005pt9s and 3005pt9 do look a lot the same.
Is there any difference between them or has one just the wrong image?
In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| Thanks! Left is 3005pt9b, right is 3005pt9s, but the middle one? Does not look
the same as 3005pt9?
In Help, Edwin073 writes:
| In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| Can someone help me identify these number bricks, because in de catalog there
are three different entries, I have three different bricks, but they do not look
the same. And they have two different logo on the stud. See attached pictures.
Thanks!
|
Hello,
Maybe this helps?
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/search.page?q=brick%201x1%209#T=P
Greetings Edwin
|
|
|
is the bold font (NL: 'vetgedrukt' ) as in the left in your
picture,
is the serif font (NL: 'met schreef' ) as in the right in
your picture.
is neither bold nor with serif, so must be the middle one in your
picture. It's image is a render, not a photo. This may explain why it looks
differently. Looking at the part numbering, it may have originally been intended
as the non-distinguished variety, but seeing your picture, it must be the plain
(thin) variety.
Can you upload your image as an additional image for these parts? I think it
is enlightening to see the bricks side by side for comparison.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: | primadeluxe | Posted: | Jul 2, 2020 05:26 | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 437-1 | Viewed: | 20 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 5 Part 3005pt9b White Brick 1 x 1 with Blue '9' Pattern (Bold Font) (Alternate) (match ID 10)
* Add 5 Part 3005pt9s White Brick 1 x 1 with Blue '9' Pattern (Serif Font)
* Change 5 Part White 3005pt9 Brick 1 x 1 with Blue '9' Pattern {Regular to Alternate}
Comments from Submitter:
See also step 2 and 3 https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1207617
|
|
Author: | primadeluxe | Posted: | Jul 2, 2020 05:20 | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 237-1 | Viewed: | 20 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 5 Part 3005pt9b White Brick 1 x 1 with Blue '9' Pattern (Bold Font) (Alternate) (match ID 10)
* Delete 5 Part 3005pt9 White Brick 1 x 1 with Blue '9' Pattern (match ID 10)
* Add 5 Part 3005pt9s White Brick 1 x 1 with Blue '9' Pattern (Serif Font)
Comments from Submitter:
See also step 2 and 3 https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1207617
|
|
Author: | primadeluxe | Posted: | Jul 2, 2020 05:12 | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 487-2 | Viewed: | 24 times | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 4 Part 3005pt9 White Brick 1 x 1 with Blue '9' Pattern (match ID 8)
* Delete 5 Part 3005pt9 White Brick 1 x 1 with Blue '9' Pattern (Alternate) (match ID 8)
* Add 4 Part 3005pt9s White Brick 1 x 1 with Blue '9' Pattern (Serif Font)
* Add 5 Part 3005pt9s White Brick 1 x 1 with Blue '9' Pattern (Serif Font) (Alternate)
Comments from Submitter:
See step 2 https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1207617
|
|
Author: | primadeluxe | Posted: | Jul 2, 2020 04:48 | Subject: | Re: Number bricks: which is which | Viewed: | 61 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Recap see picture!
In Catalog Identification, primadeluxe writes:
| To come back on the serif numbered bricks (3005pt{number}s) the variations in
print are due to the material (CA, ABS) and the mold pip (edge, side):
1. CA with old logo and edge mold pip (around 1958-1963). Old logo is wide straight.
2. ABS with old logo and edge mold pip (around 1963-1968). Old logo is wide round.
3. ABS with modern logo and side mold pip (around 1968-......)
See pictures.
This also explains the variantion in the print, which are in all the 3 cases
embossed. The 3005pt{number} is also embossed and the 3005pt{number}b has a surface
print.
In Catalog Identification, primadeluxe writes:
| Within the serif numbered bricks (3005pt{number}s) I found also some difference
in the print. See picture. For example number 6: right in the picture has an
old logo on the stud and the two on the left have modern and old logo on the
stud, but I think this are just variations.
So maybe a reshuffle of the images, variantions and sets appearing is in order.
Also looking at set 237, because the bold numbered bricks could not be a alternate
for this set. The bold numbers all have a modern logo (1968) and yet in 1966
the set 237 (1960) was replaced by set 437. So the bold numbered bricks could
be a alternate for set 437, but not for set 237.
In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| I think the serif number bricks (3005pt{number}s) should be appear in the 3 sets
487, 437 and 237 and not the ones which are know appearing (3005pt{number}).
Looking at the pictures of these sets, it would make sence, also because the
serif bricks have both the modern logo (appears in 1968) and old logo (appears
in 1958) on the studs.
The number bricks of my picture only have the modern logo on the stud and from
which sets they are I do not know. I have looked at a lot of pictures of sets
with numbered bricks, but did not find one with the bricks on my picture. So
they could easely be the 3005pt{number} bricks.
In Help, hpoort writes:
| In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| The images in the inventory of part 3005pt9s and 3005pt9 do look a lot the same.
Is there any difference between them or has one just the wrong image?
In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| Thanks! Left is 3005pt9b, right is 3005pt9s, but the middle one? Does not look
the same as 3005pt9?
In Help, Edwin073 writes:
| In Help, primadeluxe writes:
| Can someone help me identify these number bricks, because in de catalog there
are three different entries, I have three different bricks, but they do not look
the same. And they have two different logo on the stud. See attached pictures.
Thanks!
|
Hello,
Maybe this helps?
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/search.page?q=brick%201x1%209#T=P
Greetings Edwin
|
|
|
is the bold font (NL: 'vetgedrukt' ) as in the left in your
picture,
is the serif font (NL: 'met schreef' ) as in the right in
your picture.
is neither bold nor with serif, so must be the middle one in your
picture. It's image is a render, not a photo. This may explain why it looks
differently. Looking at the part numbering, it may have originally been intended
as the non-distinguished variety, but seeing your picture, it must be the plain
(thin) variety.
Can you upload your image as an additional image for these parts? I think it
is enlightening to see the bricks side by side for comparison.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|