Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | StormChaser  | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 17:28 | | Subject: | Re: Admin Russell, what's with the images? | | Viewed: | 58 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, mfav writes:
| | Just thinking
it's smarter to fix the problem now before another gazillion images get posted
and end up in the wrong slot and then need to be "fixed".
|
Agreed and thank you for bringing it up. It could be human error since I approved
some of the images you mention. I'm sure Russell will shed some light on
the issue.
|
 |
| Author: | mfav | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 17:23 | | Subject: | Re: Admin Russell, what's with the images? | | Viewed: | 70 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
| | It's all rather confusing, even to me, but I don't believe it is the
result of either human error or database corruption.
|
It has to be one or the other or both. It may occur in the underlying programming
which does whatever it does when an "old" image gets replaced (or bumped, or
set to primary, or whatever you call it) with a "new" image.
If my "new" "large" image replaced otherperson's "large" image...used to
be I'd get credit for "large" image. Now, in some circumstances which I cannot
define, my "new" image ends up being credited to the previous(?) large image
uploader. Or something.
There's not supposed to be either "large" or "small" image any more. Now
there's just "image" and where there used to be "small" and "large" there
is now "multiple"....at least that's how I understood the Great Image Declaration
from Russell some time back.
If my images are showing up in somebody else's register, and somebody else's
images are showing up in someotherbodyelse's register...well...that's
database corruption.
Maybe it's just programming, but something somewhere is awry. Just thinking
it's smarter to fix the problem now before another gazillion images get posted
and end up in the wrong slot and then need to be "fixed".
|
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 16:49 | | Subject: | Re: Admin Russell, what's with the images? | | Viewed: | 81 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
| | you are credited with the large image.
|
| | and the small image is credited to hazelsden.
|
Oops. Other way around. Confusing, as I said, even to me.
|
|
| Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 16:45 | | Subject: | Re: Admin Russell, what's with the images? | | Viewed: | 96 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, mfav writes:
| | I'm noticing my "large" images for these items are showing up as being credited
to other contributors.
|
Russell would indeed be the person to answer this, but in many cases it comes
down to the way the system is designed. On this, for example:
The legacy image is from hazelsden. The color image is from you. The color
image is shown as the primary image, which is why you are credited with the large
image. The legacy image also exists, which is why it is shown as an additional
image and the small image is credited to hazelsden.
It's all rather confusing, even to me, but I don't believe it is the
result of either human error or database corruption.
| | And I'm credited for these "small" images which aren't mine...and no
idea whose they are.
|
Those I cannot explain.
|
|
| Author: | mfav | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 16:33 | | Subject: | Admin Russell, what's with the images? | | Viewed: | 252 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
| I'm noticing my "large" images for these items are showing up as being credited
to other contributors.
Kevin1990
- 970c00pb099
- 970c34pb01
swrbricks
- 970c10pb01
- 970c09pb01
- 970c11pb04
jennnifer
- 970c69pb01
- 970c00pb075
- 970c00pb195
Nikilyn
- 970c00pb337
hazelsden
- 970c86pb02
www_mybricks_de
- 970c00 (red)
And I'm credited for these "small" images which aren't mine...and no
idea whose they are.
air023
atl017
gen052
gen053
stu002
cty057
sw016
aqu011
lea005
sw049
twn029
pln100
pln003
pln050
pln057
pln058
pm012
soc034
(I thought the whole "small image" thing was kaput some time last year...no?)
If this is human error, that's one thing. If there are systemic issues or
database corruption or something else going on, then it probably should be looked
into before it gets worse.
|
|
| Author: | runner.caller | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 16:27 | | Subject: | Re: Add weight as a search parameter. | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, robosushi writes:
| | Could the weight of an item be added as one of the search options? It would
really speed up finding unusual parts if I could just plug in the weight and
bring it up.
|
If the item is big enough for it's weight to be unique, I would think that
typically the element ID is molded somewhere on there large enough to see and
read without too much effort and type in to easily find with the search bar.
|
|
| Author: | robosushi | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 15:46 | | Subject: | Add weight as a search parameter. | | Viewed: | 53 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| Could the weight of an item be added as one of the search options? It would
really speed up finding unusual parts if I could just plug in the weight and
bring it up.
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 15:21 | | Subject: | Re: Sixth Catalog Project Underway | | Viewed: | 48 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, Dino1 writes:
| | In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | This one seems fairly pointless:
"93791 found in Ninjago sets from 2011 in Black, Red and Dark Bluish Gray"
|
It does not seem pointless to me. If you want to complete a Ninjago spinner set
from the original era of Ninjago with all original parts, you will want the boat
stud that was made in China with item number 93791 and not item number 2654.
Cheers,
Randy
|
And why do you and others add "alternate" Numbers to parts, without naming the
sets?
Werner
|
Because most of them are in my opinion "generic" and do not have any significance
for me or my collection. This boat stud has a lot of significance for my Ninjago
collection, so I asked for the note to be added. If others want notes added to
other parts that are important to them, then they can request them just like
I did. No one is stopping you or anyone else from doing that. In the end though,
it is at the discretion of the Catalog Admins whether any notes get added.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 15:09 | | Subject: | Re: Sixth Catalog Project Underway | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | This one seems fairly pointless:
"93791 found in Ninjago sets from 2011 in Black, Red and Dark Bluish Gray"
|
It does not seem pointless to me. If you want to complete a Ninjago spinner set
from the original era of Ninjago with all original parts, you will want the boat
stud that was made in China with item number 93791 and not item number 2654.
Cheers,
Randy
|
OK, but doesn't that hold for many part variations for older sets? These
parts look identical apart from the code number, don't they? Whereas there
are many variations of the good old 1x4 or 2x4 brick that don't get entries
or notes. There is no mention at all for the 1x4 brick, for example, that the
underneaths may have solid or holed rods, or cross supports, and so on.
|
So have the notes added to the parts you would like more information on just
like I had that note added to the boat stud back in the day. Easy peasy. 
The item number 93791 on some boat studs is *very* specific to a certain time
and place of manufacture unlike the overwhelming majority of parts, and I thought
the information was beneficial to add before it got lost to the sands of time.
Getting rid of good knowledge for the sake of getting rid of it is unnecessary.
In fact, my general argument for BrickLink as a whole was always to get as much
information as possible into the system from the huge amount of LEGO knowledge
that frequents this site regularly.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
| Author: | Dino | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 15:04 | | Subject: | Re: Sixth Catalog Project Underway | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | This one seems fairly pointless:
"93791 found in Ninjago sets from 2011 in Black, Red and Dark Bluish Gray"
|
It does not seem pointless to me. If you want to complete a Ninjago spinner set
from the original era of Ninjago with all original parts, you will want the boat
stud that was made in China with item number 93791 and not item number 2654.
Cheers,
Randy
|
And why do you and others add "alternate" Numbers to parts, without naming the
sets?
Werner
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 14:52 | | Subject: | Re: Sixth Catalog Project Underway | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | This one seems fairly pointless:
"93791 found in Ninjago sets from 2011 in Black, Red and Dark Bluish Gray"
|
It does not seem pointless to me. If you want to complete a Ninjago spinner set
from the original era of Ninjago with all original parts, you will want the boat
stud that was made in China with item number 93791 and not item number 2654.
Cheers,
Randy
|
OK, but doesn't that hold for many part variations for older sets? These
parts look identical apart from the code number, don't they? Whereas there
are many variations of the good old 1x4 or 2x4 brick that don't get entries
or notes. There is no mention at all for the 1x4 brick, for example, that the
underneaths may have solid or holed rods, or cross supports, and so on.
|
|
| Author: | elias3 | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 14:39 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 60057-1 | | Viewed: | 15 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Minifig cty473a Orange Jacket with Hood over Light Blue Sweater, Blue Legs, Dark Orange Short Tousled Hair, Crooked Smile with Brown Dimple (Alternate) (Alternate) (match ID 2)
* Change 1 Minifig cty473 Orange Jacket with Hood over Light Blue Sweater, Blue Legs, Dark Orange Short Tousled Hair, Crooked Smile with Black Dimple {match ID 0 to 2}
Comments from Submitter:
the alternate MF
|
|
| Author: | lego__LE | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 14:37 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 4779-1 | | Viewed: | 13 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, randyf writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, lego__LE writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, lego__LE writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change 1 Part Pearl Light Gray {51711pb01 Duplo Utensil Shield, Angled Triangle with Gold Lion and Crown Facing Right Pattern to 51711pb04 Duplo Utensil Shield, Angled Triangle with Yellow Lion and Crown Facing Left Pattern}
Comments from Submitter:
On the Lego homepage under service/replacementparts it shows this variant of the shield as part of the set. I will also upload a picture of the original box which shows the different parts.
|
|
This set was inventoried from "Sealed Set Contents" originally, so I am reluctant
to make changes to it unless we have really good reason to.
Unfortunately, parts lists on set boxes and the official LEGO replacement parts
service have been both found over the years to contain errors. Therefore, I do
not use either of them to make decisions unless they are taken in context with
some kind of information from real set contents.
As stated in a previous thread on these sets, I have found used sets with both
shields in them. Even though used sets are not the best evidence, they do show
that we need to be very careful about which shield (or shields) we put in each
inventory.
Until better evidence is found, changes to these shields in the sets they are
in will not be approved.
Cheers,
Randy
|
Sorry, it seems I had missed your last reply to the "shield dilemma". I will
just keep trying to find better evidence then.
Cheers,
Mario
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 14:30 | | Subject: | Re: Sixth Catalog Project Underway | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| | This one seems fairly pointless:
"93791 found in Ninjago sets from 2011 in Black, Red and Dark Bluish Gray"
|
It does not seem pointless to me. If you want to complete a Ninjago spinner set
from the original era of Ninjago with all original parts, you will want the boat
stud that was made in China with item number 93791 and not item number 2654.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
| Author: | Leut | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 14:30 | | Subject: | Re: Add HTML functionality to shipping message | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, calsbricks writes:
| | In Suggestions, Leut writes:
| | In Suggestions, calsbricks writes:
| | In Suggestions, Leut writes:
| | When I ship an order with a courier and I get a track-and-trace code, I also
add a URL to the message with which the buyer can easily keep an eye on the courier's
website and the status of the parcel.
This URL however can only be inserted as plain text and looks rather old school
and not quite professional as I would like to see. An image is attached to show
what I mean.
Is it a possibility there's some kind of HTML options added to the shipment
message with which we -the sellers- are able to create good looking messages?
If something like this already exists or if there are any other options I might
have overlooked, please do inform so.
|
Hi there - very strange
We add the tracking url to our drive through messages and it works fine.
This is the URL that we use, replacing the [TRACKING NUMBVER] field with the
Post Office tracking number.
http://www.royalmail.com/portal/rm/track?trackNumber=[TRACKING NUMBER]
|
That already looks better than mine.
But wouldn’t it be more nicer to mention the tracking number only in the drive
through message, and this tracking number is a hyperlink, on which the buyer
can click to get routed to the courier’s statuspage?
|
That above URL is pasted into our drive-thru messages with the appropriate number
in it (replacing the word tracking number) and over 5000 orders later we have
never had a problem other than they click on the link and the post office haven't
updated the information yet but that always goes away after a day or so.
Go to your postal service or courier web site and I am sure in their support
section they will have a list of the URL's to use with examples. That is
what we did
We still agree with you about smartening up the message capabilities so it can
be more of a marketing tool but at least you should be able to do this without
any problems.
|
I guess that’ll be the most easiest solution for the time being. I’ll look into
the default message section and add some standardized URL’s with the tracking
number then added by the system.
Thanks anyway for your input!
|
|
| Author: | calsbricks | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 13:33 | | Subject: | Re: Add HTML functionality to shipping message | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Leut writes:
| | In Suggestions, calsbricks writes:
| | In Suggestions, Leut writes:
| | When I ship an order with a courier and I get a track-and-trace code, I also
add a URL to the message with which the buyer can easily keep an eye on the courier's
website and the status of the parcel.
This URL however can only be inserted as plain text and looks rather old school
and not quite professional as I would like to see. An image is attached to show
what I mean.
Is it a possibility there's some kind of HTML options added to the shipment
message with which we -the sellers- are able to create good looking messages?
If something like this already exists or if there are any other options I might
have overlooked, please do inform so.
|
Hi there - very strange
We add the tracking url to our drive through messages and it works fine.
This is the URL that we use, replacing the [TRACKING NUMBVER] field with the
Post Office tracking number.
http://www.royalmail.com/portal/rm/track?trackNumber=[TRACKING NUMBER]
|
That already looks better than mine.
But wouldn’t it be more nicer to mention the tracking number only in the drive
through message, and this tracking number is a hyperlink, on which the buyer
can click to get routed to the courier’s statuspage?
|
That above URL is pasted into our drive-thru messages with the appropriate number
in it (replacing the word tracking number) and over 5000 orders later we have
never had a problem other than they click on the link and the post office haven't
updated the information yet but that always goes away after a day or so.
Go to your postal service or courier web site and I am sure in their support
section they will have a list of the URL's to use with examples. That is
what we did
We still agree with you about smartening up the message capabilities so it can
be more of a marketing tool but at least you should be able to do this without
any problems.
|
|
| Author: | Leut | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 13:26 | | Subject: | Re: Add HTML functionality to shipping message | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, calsbricks writes:
| | In Suggestions, Leut writes:
| | When I ship an order with a courier and I get a track-and-trace code, I also
add a URL to the message with which the buyer can easily keep an eye on the courier's
website and the status of the parcel.
This URL however can only be inserted as plain text and looks rather old school
and not quite professional as I would like to see. An image is attached to show
what I mean.
Is it a possibility there's some kind of HTML options added to the shipment
message with which we -the sellers- are able to create good looking messages?
If something like this already exists or if there are any other options I might
have overlooked, please do inform so.
|
Hi there - very strange
We add the tracking url to our drive through messages and it works fine.
This is the URL that we use, replacing the [TRACKING NUMBVER] field with the
Post Office tracking number.
http://www.royalmail.com/portal/rm/track?trackNumber=[TRACKING NUMBER]
|
That already looks better than mine.
But wouldn’t it be more nicer to mention the tracking number only in the drive
through message, and this tracking number is a hyperlink, on which the buyer
can click to get routed to the courier’s statuspage?
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 13:12 | | Subject: | Re: Sixth Catalog Project Underway | | Viewed: | 52 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| This one seems fairly pointless:
"93791 found in Ninjago sets from 2011 in Black, Red and Dark Bluish Gray"
|
|
| Author: | calsbricks | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 13:11 | | Subject: | Re: Add HTML functionality to shipping message | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Leut writes:
| | When I ship an order with a courier and I get a track-and-trace code, I also
add a URL to the message with which the buyer can easily keep an eye on the courier's
website and the status of the parcel.
This URL however can only be inserted as plain text and looks rather old school
and not quite professional as I would like to see. An image is attached to show
what I mean.
Is it a possibility there's some kind of HTML options added to the shipment
message with which we -the sellers- are able to create good looking messages?
If something like this already exists or if there are any other options I might
have overlooked, please do inform so.
|
Hi there - very strange
We add the tracking url to our drive through messages and it works fine.
This is the URL that we use, replacing the [TRACKING NUMBVER] field with the
Post Office tracking number.
http://www.royalmail.com/portal/rm/track?trackNumber=[TRACKING NUMBER]
|
|
| Author: | Leut | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 13:00 | | Subject: | Add HTML functionality to shipping message | | Viewed: | 63 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| When I ship an order with a courier and I get a track-and-trace code, I also
add a URL to the message with which the buyer can easily keep an eye on the courier's
website and the status of the parcel.
This URL however can only be inserted as plain text and looks rather old school
and not quite professional as I would like to see. An image is attached to show
what I mean.
Is it a possibility there's some kind of HTML options added to the shipment
message with which we -the sellers- are able to create good looking messages?
If something like this already exists or if there are any other options I might
have overlooked, please do inform so.
|
|
|
| Author: | grimsbricksuk | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 12:51 | | Subject: | Re: Issue with New Minifig sw988 | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Just seen this post...
The names of the minifigs were only my proposed suggestions & can be changed
by anyone at anytime following approval. I did not want to reference sw988 as
'Angry Clone' or 'Mad Face' as you suggest because I wanted
to better identify the main difference between sw988 & sw986
Also, these are three separate Star Wars characters, therefore they justified
their own 'sw' number in my opinion, rather than have a/b/c variants.
Finally, I was unable to upload images which also showed the faces as I'm
still learning how to do that, any help there would be appreciated.
In Catalog, LordInTheNorth writes:
| | This minifig is listed wrong in the catalog. The out side parts of the 3 minifigs
in set 75226 are all the same but one has a belt ... and other differences are
...
sw988 - a - normal storm trooper head (male) with belt part ... like in batman
sets (but black)
sw988 - b - sunken eyes no belt. (outside same as others minus the belt)
sw988 - c - mad face no belt. (outside same as others minus the belt)
Not sure what needs to happen but ... that minifig should be changed.
|
|
|
| Author: | lego.12vtrains | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 11:54 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 744-1 | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| | Here below 3 pictures from an eBay auction in which the 2 papers can be seen. |
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 09:49 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6376-1 | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, randyf writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, SezaR writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 5 Part 2536 Brown Plant, Tree Palm Trunk - (MARKED FOR DELETION - Undetermined Connector Version)
* Add 5 Part 2536b Brown Plant, Tree Palm Trunk - Short Connector, no Axle Hole
* Delete 11 Part 2453 White Brick 1 x 1 x 5 - Undetermined Stud Type
* Add 11 Part 2453a White Brick 1 x 1 x 5 - Blocked Open Stud or Hollow Stud
|
Sealed set unboxing and building can be found here:
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=432171
Images attached in case hyperlink becomes unusable.
The white 1x1x5 bricks are definitely blocked open stud or hollow stud.
The brown palm tree trunks are definitely of the short connector variety, but
I can't see inside them. However, with Fred's additional information,
the request will also be accepted.
Thanks, guys!
Cheers,
Randy
|
From the same set unboxing and building, we can also see the black 1x2 modified
tiles. It confirms both of your findings. They do not have a groove.
I will manually adjust these in the inventory.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 09:36 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6376-1 | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, SezaR writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 5 Part 2536 Brown Plant, Tree Palm Trunk - (MARKED FOR DELETION - Undetermined Connector Version)
* Add 5 Part 2536b Brown Plant, Tree Palm Trunk - Short Connector, no Axle Hole
* Delete 11 Part 2453 White Brick 1 x 1 x 5 - Undetermined Stud Type
* Add 11 Part 2453a White Brick 1 x 1 x 5 - Blocked Open Stud or Hollow Stud
|
Sealed set unboxing and building can be found here:
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=432171
Images attached in case hyperlink becomes unusable.
The white 1x1x5 bricks are definitely blocked open stud or hollow stud.
The brown palm tree trunks are definitely of the short connector variety, but
I can't see inside them. However, with Fred's additional information,
the request will also be accepted.
Thanks, guys!
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
|
| Author: | lego.12vtrains | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 09:15 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 744-1 | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| | These 2 papers are included in my copy of set 744, please see the attached photos. |
|
| Author: | lego.12vtrains | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 09:07 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 744-1 | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 1 Part 191528 (Not Applicable) Batteries Information Sheet
* Add 1 Part 113582 (Not Applicable) Paper, Information Note, Use of Battery Box - 113582-D/F/I
|
| Author: | lego.12vtrains | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 07:31 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 7740-1 | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| I checked both the instructions and the pictures on the box, it is not 100% clear
but it seems like the sticker has to be attacked on both sides of the timetable,
so the sticker part is correct.
|
|
| Author: | FreeStorm | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 05:51 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6376-1 | | Viewed: | 22 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, SezaR writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 5 Part 2536 Brown Plant, Tree Palm Trunk - (MARKED FOR DELETION - Undetermined Connector Version)
* Add 5 Part 2536b Brown Plant, Tree Palm Trunk - Short Connector, no Axle Hole
* Delete 11 Part 2453 White Brick 1 x 1 x 5 - Undetermined Stud Type
* Add 11 Part 2453a White Brick 1 x 1 x 5 - Blocked Open Stud or Hollow Stud
|
I looked with my 6376-1 that has never been mixed with other parts since I had
it (it always stayed mounted and I receive sealed when I was a child)
I have exactly the same parts as SezaR.
Also for other parts not in the request.
|
|
| Author: | SezaR | | Posted: | Jan 2, 2019 00:05 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6376-1 | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, SezaR writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 5 Part 2536 Brown Plant, Tree Palm Trunk - (MARKED FOR DELETION - Undetermined Connector Version)
* Add 5 Part 2536b Brown Plant, Tree Palm Trunk - Short Connector, no Axle Hole
* Delete 11 Part 2453 White Brick 1 x 1 x 5 - Undetermined Stud Type
* Add 11 Part 2453a White Brick 1 x 1 x 5 - Blocked Open Stud or Hollow Stud
|
I am not sure if this helps but anyway I have three used copies of this set.
I bought two of them from one seller(one complete, the second one 95-95% complete)
and the third one from another seller which was 100% complete (in a big lot of
vintage boxed sets from the same era). Therefore in total, two complete copies
and one 90% complete.
All the parts appear to be original, in particular they all come with
with cross support
with solid studs
with blocked open stud (the incomplete copy missed this brick)
Two parts in the inventory of this set are marked for deletation or undetermined
type*. In ALL my three copies, they are
Short Connector, no Axle Hole (sorry for the bad quality of photos) (the incomplete
copy had 4 of this brick instead of 5)
and
with blocked open stud. (the incomplete copy had 10 of this brick instead of
11)
)
I checked the instructions. These tall bricks don't have solid stud there
(either hollow or open-blocked stud which is not clear).
I hope this helps.
P.S. While writing this post, I realized that black bricks
are of undetermined type. I checked them in my three copies and they are all
without bottom groove.
If accepted, I can submit a request to change them too.
|
|
|
|
USA, Oklahoma
Luxembourg
United Kingdom, England
Belgium, Oost-Vlaanderen
Germany, Sachsen
Netherlands, Drenthe
Italy, Veneto
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Switzerland, Vaud
Canada, British Columbia
)
)
)
)
)