Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | Admin_Russell  | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 22:22 | | Subject: | Re: Complete set of Unikitty CMFs? | | Viewed: | 76 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, chetzler writes:
| | In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| | In Catalog, chetzler writes:
| |
Is this supposed to be the entry for the complete set of 12 unique Unikitty collectible
minifigs? This whole entry is very confusing. The name says "complete random
set" and also "1 minifigure". The inventory shows 12 unique figs. Which is
it: a random set of 12? One random figure? A complete set of all the figs?
The price guide doesn't help much: the average prices seem too low for a
set of 12 and too high for a single fig. Judging by the individual prices it
appears that some sellers are treating this entry as a single random fig and
others are treating it as a a set of 12.
|
This is a known problem. This entry is *supposed* to be for ONE complete minifigure
(randomly chosen from the available 12), but because we do not have an entry
type for the complete set of 12 minifigures (yet), some sellers use this entry
type for that purpose as well.
|
Can we get a note on this entry that explicitly states this? As I noted above
the name is misleading as is the image showing all 12 figures.
|
I've added the note to this entry and will add similar notes to other entries
later. One of the other things I'm planning on doing is coming up with an
image that more clearly shows the random nature of the entry, e.g. an image of
the foil pack with a large question mark over it. If someone wants to give this
a shot, we will try a different image and see if that improves things.
| | | | The drawback of creating another entry type is that we already have multiple
ways these are sold, and we are concerned that it might add to the confusion:
|
It certainly wouldn't be more confusing than this entry as it currently stands.
| |
| | Am I better off creating a super lot if I want to sell a complete set of 12?
|
The site officially discourages sellers from using superlots for any purposes.
|
It does? Why? This is the first I have heard this. Is this stated somewhere?
|
| | I understand that some people abuse the superlot function by listing one item
for $0.01 and the others at an outrageous price. I have never done this and
I have sold several superlots at fair, discounted prices. If BrickLink doesn't
like super lots it should disable that feature.
|
Apparently there was a serious problem with people abusing the feature in connection
with Easy Buy, so superlots are now hidden unless buyers opt to see them. Superlots
have never been a favorite thing for a long time, probably because they are so
awkward to work with. But the site doesn't want to just cut things from people's
stores, either, so the feature has been left there for buyers and sellers that
want it.
| | How would you recommend selling a complete set of CMFs?
|
Personally, I would do what these other sellers have done and list the whole
set under the random entry. As long as you describe things clearly in your notes,
buyers will understand that they are paying for a whole set. This is one of those
areas where the average prices must be deduced from scanning listings or sold
listings instead of the calculated averages.
|
 |
| Author: | Jetflap | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 20:59 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6440-1 | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, Jetflap writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change {3 to 4} Part Yellow 3062b Brick, Round 1 x 1 Open Stud
Comments from Submitter:
4 are clearly required for the set, 2 are used in the fire extinguishers and 2 for the water cannons. See photo from back of box the shows 2 fire extinguishers and two alternate builds that require 4 of this part.
|
|
|
|
| Author: | Jetflap | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 20:58 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 6440-1 | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change {3 to 4} Part Yellow 3062b Brick, Round 1 x 1 Open Stud
Comments from Submitter:
4 are clearly required for the set, 2 are used in the fire extinguishers and 2 for the water cannons. See photo from back of box the shows 2 fire extinguishers and two alternate builds that require 4 of this part.
|
|
| Author: | chetzler | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 17:48 | | Subject: | Re: Complete set of Unikitty CMFs? | | Viewed: | 56 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| | In Catalog, chetzler writes:
| |
Is this supposed to be the entry for the complete set of 12 unique Unikitty collectible
minifigs? This whole entry is very confusing. The name says "complete random
set" and also "1 minifigure". The inventory shows 12 unique figs. Which is
it: a random set of 12? One random figure? A complete set of all the figs?
The price guide doesn't help much: the average prices seem too low for a
set of 12 and too high for a single fig. Judging by the individual prices it
appears that some sellers are treating this entry as a single random fig and
others are treating it as a a set of 12.
|
This is a known problem. This entry is *supposed* to be for ONE complete minifigure
(randomly chosen from the available 12), but because we do not have an entry
type for the complete set of 12 minifigures (yet), some sellers use this entry
type for that purpose as well.
|
Can we get a note on this entry that explicitly states this? As I noted above
the name is misleading as is the image showing all 12 figures.
| |
The drawback of creating another entry type is that we already have multiple
ways these are sold, and we are concerned that it might add to the confusion:
|
It certainly wouldn't be more confusing than this entry as it currently stands.
| |
| | Am I better off creating a super lot if I want to sell a complete set of 12?
|
The site officially discourages sellers from using superlots for any purposes.
|
It does? Why? This is the first I have heard this. Is this stated somewhere?
How would you recommend selling a complete set of CMFs?
I understand that some people abuse the superlot function by listing one item
for $0.01 and the others at an outrageous price. I have never done this and
I have sold several superlots at fair, discounted prices. If BrickLink doesn't
like super lots it should disable that feature.
|
|
| Author: | chetzler | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 17:39 | | Subject: | Re: Complete set of Unikitty CMFs? | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| | In Catalog, chetzler writes:
| |
Is this supposed to be the entry for the complete set of 12 unique Unikitty collectible
minifigs? This whole entry is very confusing. The name says "complete random
set" and also "1 minifigure". The inventory shows 12 unique figs. Which is
it: a random set of 12? One random figure? A complete set of all the figs?
|
The entry above is for one random foil pack containing one random character,
thus the terms "Complete Random Set of 1 Minifigure". In the inventory, this
is represented by the "Or:" relationship and the Match ID of 1. That relationship
means you can get the first minifigure in the inventory *or* the second minifigure
in the inventory *or* the third minifigure in the inventory, etc., but not all
at once.
|
OK, thanks. I can see now how the match makes sense from a technical standpoint
(because I understand how the match ID works) but this is probably confusing
to many buyers, especially new ones. The name is still misleading: both "complete"
and "set of" would lead people to believe they are getting something other than
one random figure.
| |
There are no official catalog entries for full sets of collectible minifigures.
|
This would be a very useful entry
|
|
| Author: | Admin_Russell | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 17:08 | | Subject: | Re: Complete set of Unikitty CMFs? | | Viewed: | 54 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, chetzler writes:
| |
Is this supposed to be the entry for the complete set of 12 unique Unikitty collectible
minifigs? This whole entry is very confusing. The name says "complete random
set" and also "1 minifigure". The inventory shows 12 unique figs. Which is
it: a random set of 12? One random figure? A complete set of all the figs?
The price guide doesn't help much: the average prices seem too low for a
set of 12 and too high for a single fig. Judging by the individual prices it
appears that some sellers are treating this entry as a single random fig and
others are treating it as a a set of 12.
|
This is a known problem. This entry is *supposed* to be for ONE complete minifigure
(randomly chosen from the available 12), but because we do not have an entry
type for the complete set of 12 minifigures (yet), some sellers use this entry
type for that purpose as well.
The drawback of creating another entry type is that we already have multiple
ways these are sold, and we are concerned that it might add to the confusion:
| | Am I better off creating a super lot if I want to sell a complete set of 12?
|
The site officially discourages sellers from using superlots for any purposes.
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 17:05 | | Subject: | Re: Complete set of Unikitty CMFs? | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, chetzler writes:
| |
Is this supposed to be the entry for the complete set of 12 unique Unikitty collectible
minifigs? This whole entry is very confusing. The name says "complete random
set" and also "1 minifigure". The inventory shows 12 unique figs. Which is
it: a random set of 12? One random figure? A complete set of all the figs?
|
The entry above is for one random foil pack containing one random character,
thus the terms "Complete Random Set of 1 Minifigure". In the inventory, this
is represented by the "Or:" relationship and the Match ID of 1. That relationship
means you can get the first minifigure in the inventory *or* the second minifigure
in the inventory *or* the third minifigure in the inventory, etc., but not all
at once.
There are no official catalog entries for full sets of collectible minifigures.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
| Author: | chetzler | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 16:54 | | Subject: | Complete set of Unikitty CMFs? | | Viewed: | 109 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
|
Is this supposed to be the entry for the complete set of 12 unique Unikitty collectible
minifigs? This whole entry is very confusing. The name says "complete random
set" and also "1 minifigure". The inventory shows 12 unique figs. Which is
it: a random set of 12? One random figure? A complete set of all the figs?
The price guide doesn't help much: the average prices seem too low for a
set of 12 and too high for a single fig. Judging by the individual prices it
appears that some sellers are treating this entry as a single random fig and
others are treating it as a a set of 12.
Am I better off creating a super lot if I want to sell a complete set of 12?
|
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 16:31 | | Subject: | Re: Correct handling of 18904c01pb01 | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, normann1974 writes:
| | In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog, normann1974 writes:
| | Please take a look at:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=18904c01pb01&in=S
The crocodile consists of 4 parts and doesn't come assembled (at least not
in set 60157 which I just parted out). So isn't the correct way to include
the four parts in the inventories and the complete assembly as a counterpart
for all sets in the above list?
/Jan
|
You are correct. The pieces that come in the set should be included in the inventory
with the complete animal in the counterparts.
|
I'd love to fix this, but your response contradicts what two other admins
say in this thread. I'll let you all agree before I do anything.
/Jan
|
My response doesn't matter if the admins contradict it. But you will see
that Russell didn't exactly contradict me. He said they belong there, but
they just can't go there for the moment.
|
|
| Author: | FreeStorm | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 16:24 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 8214-1 | | Viewed: | 18 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, FreeStorm writes:
| | PS: I do made request for part ID:410523
|
PS: I do NOT made request for part ID:410523
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Author: | Admin_Russell | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 15:41 | | Subject: | Re: Parts for 42095-1 | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
| In Inventories, xosofox writes:
| | Hi,
as I understand, parts lists for products need to be added and approved.
I'm missing the parts for 42095-1 Stunt Racer. And if they are not yet added,
I'd like to contribute.
Or can I see somehow if the list is already submitted and needs approval?
|
You may start here:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogInvAdd.asp
There are links on that page to the instructions. Be sure you use Manual Upload,
and take advantage of the autofill when the screen pops up. Any other questions,
please ask. 
|
| Author: | FreeStorm | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 15:38 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 7936-1 | | Viewed: | 10 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, FreeStorm writes:
Image posted for future reference in case hyperlink becomes unusable.
We can see on the picture that we don't have the "groove"
|
|
|
| Author: | FreeStorm | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 15:31 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 3222-1 | | Viewed: | 18 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, FreeStorm writes:
Image posted for future reference in case hyperlink becomes unusable.
We can see on the picture that we don't have the "groove"
|
|
|
| Author: | FreeStorm | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 15:26 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 30021-1 | | Viewed: | 17 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, FreeStorm writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change 1 Part Black {3794 Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud (Jumper) (Undetermined Type) to 3794a Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud without Groove (Jumper)}
* Change 1 Part White {3794 Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud (Jumper) (Undetermined Type) to 3794a Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud without Groove (Jumper)}
Comments from Submitter:
Source:
https://youtu.be/5sd_vsI66so
https://www.flickr.com/photos/24166730@N07/4568984535/in/photostream/
|
Image posted for future reference in case hyperlink becomes unusable.
We can see on the picture that we don't have the "groove"
|
|
|
| Author: | normann1974 | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 15:00 | | Subject: | Re: Correct handling of 18904c01pb01 | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| | In Catalog, normann1974 writes:
| | Please take a look at:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=18904c01pb01&in=S
The crocodile consists of 4 parts and doesn't come assembled (at least not
in set 60157 which I just parted out). So isn't the correct way to include
the four parts in the inventories and the complete assembly as a counterpart
for all sets in the above list?
/Jan
|
You are correct. The pieces that come in the set should be included in the inventory
with the complete animal in the counterparts.
|
I'd love to fix this, but your response contradicts what two other admins
say in this thread. I'll let you all agree before I do anything.
/Jan
|
|
| Author: | Admin_Russell | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 14:48 | | Subject: | Re: Correct handling of 18904c01pb01 | | Viewed: | 53 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, normann1974 writes:
| | My question was not related to part-out but about consistency between the inventories.
Isn't that important?
/Jan
|
Hi Jan,
tEoS is correct. This is an exception (for modern inventories only) that stems
from the current limitations of the BrickLink partout feature. Dinosaurs from
the Jurassic World sets fall into the same category. Once the partout feature
is upgraded, we will move all of these animals to the counterpart section where
they really belong.
| | | | Unfortunately, counterparts don't display on the part-out page. Until that
is changed I think things like this must be left as is.
In Catalog, normann1974 writes:
| | Please take a look at:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=18904c01pb01&in=S
The crocodile consists of 4 parts and doesn't come assembled (at least not
in set 60157 which I just parted out). So isn't the correct way to include
the four parts in the inventories and the complete assembly as a counterpart
for all sets in the above list?
/Jan
|
|
|
|
|
| Author: | FreeStorm | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 14:47 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 30021-1 | | Viewed: | 18 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change 1 Part Black {3794 Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud (Jumper) (Undetermined Type) to 3794a Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud without Groove (Jumper)}
* Change 1 Part White {3794 Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud (Jumper) (Undetermined Type) to 3794a Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud without Groove (Jumper)}
Comments from Submitter:
Source:
https://youtu.be/5sd_vsI66so
https://www.flickr.com/photos/24166730@N07/4568984535/in/photostream/
|
|
| Author: | Biodreamer | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 14:38 | | Subject: | Re: Automated Feedback. | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, tpr writes:
| | Hi all.
Suggestion ….
Feedback is not always left by the customer. Positive is left most times, and
a customer will always leave negative or neutral if there is something wrong.
One assumes that if nothing is heard from the customer, it must have been delivered
and was ok. Therefore - Can we have an automated positive feedback say after
2 months(or whatever length of time is felt suitable) of order being delivered
for all orders still showing as shipped. It could also be implemented if the
seller has not given feedback.
Thanks
Tracy
|
No, I usually give feedback but people are a bit harsh when it comes to getting
a neutral so in the cases where I think positive is to good and neutral is a
bit harsh, I usually don't leave any and just archive the order.
Any automatic system would be required to give out neutral votes. and few sellers
would want that on their store feedback %.
The only thing the feedback system need is longer feedback notes. 80 characters
is not enough to give a small review of the order and tell what was good/bad
with it. it's just enough for a positive only review.
|
|
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 14:16 | | Subject: | Re: Correct handling of 18904c01pb01 | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, normann1974 writes:
| | Please take a look at:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=18904c01pb01&in=S
The crocodile consists of 4 parts and doesn't come assembled (at least not
in set 60157 which I just parted out). So isn't the correct way to include
the four parts in the inventories and the complete assembly as a counterpart
for all sets in the above list?
/Jan
|
You are correct. The pieces that come in the set should be included in the inventory
with the complete animal in the counterparts.
|
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 14:06 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6202-1 | | Viewed: | 22 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, 69transamman writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Delete 3 Part 4497u Flat Silver Minifigure, Weapon Pike / Spear - (MARKED FOR DELETION - Undetermined End Version)
* Add 3 Part 4497 Flat Silver Minifigure, Weapon Pike / Spear - Round End
Comments from Submitter:
Verification from video of a sealed set opening. The round ends on the spears can be seen clearly at the 7:35 mark. Commentator describes spears as not being rubbery as in previous Hero Factory releases but, being actual plastic.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOqx4x93aDg
|
Image posted for future reference in case hyperlink becomes unusable.
|
|
|
|
| Author: | normann1974 | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 12:33 | | Subject: | Re: Correct handling of 18904c01pb01 | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| My question was not related to part-out but about consistency between the inventories.
Isn't that important?
/Jan
| | Unfortunately, counterparts don't display on the part-out page. Until that
is changed I think things like this must be left as is.
In Catalog, normann1974 writes:
| | Please take a look at:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=18904c01pb01&in=S
The crocodile consists of 4 parts and doesn't come assembled (at least not
in set 60157 which I just parted out). So isn't the correct way to include
the four parts in the inventories and the complete assembly as a counterpart
for all sets in the above list?
/Jan
|
|
|
|
| Author: | bb1129666 | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 12:32 | | Subject: | Parts for 42095-1 | | Viewed: | 45 times | | Topic: | Inventories | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi,
as I understand, parts lists for products need to be added and approved.
I'm missing the parts for 42095-1 Stunt Racer. And if they are not yet added,
I'd like to contribute.
Or can I see somehow if the list is already submitted and needs approval?
|
|
|
| Author: | normann1974 | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 11:48 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 60160-1 | | Viewed: | 15 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change 2 Part Black {44301 Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 1 Finger On End (undetermined type) to 44301b Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 1 Finger On End without Bottom Groove}
* Change 2 Part Black {44302 Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 2 Fingers on End (Undetermined Type) to 44302a Hinge Plate 1 x 2 Locking with 2 Fingers on End with Bottom Groove}
Comments from Submitter:
Variants found during part-out.
|
|
|
|
|
| Author: | FreeStorm | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 11:12 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 10214-1 | | Viewed: | 20 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change 12 Part Pearl Gold {3794 Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud (Jumper) (Undetermined Type) to 3794a Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud without Groove (Jumper)}
* Change 1 Part Black {3794 Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud (Jumper) (Undetermined Type) to 3794a Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud without Groove (Jumper)}
* Change 8 Part Dark Bluish Gray {3794 Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud (Jumper) (Undetermined Type) to 3794a Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud without Groove (Jumper)}
* Change 18 Part Light Bluish Gray {3794 Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud (Jumper) (Undetermined Type) to 3794a Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud without Groove (Jumper)}
* Change 110 Part Tan {3794 Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud (Jumper) (Undetermined Type) to 3794a Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud without Groove (Jumper)}
* Change 24 Part White {3794 Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud (Jumper) (Undetermined Type) to 3794a Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud without Groove (Jumper)}
Comments from Submitter:
Source:
From personal sealed set , build once and never disassembled.
My set version is with
|
|
| Author: | tEoS | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 11:06 | | Subject: | Re: Correct handling of 18904c01pb01 | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Unfortunately, counterparts don't display on the part-out page. Until that
is changed I think things like this must be left as is.
In Catalog, normann1974 writes:
| | Please take a look at:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=18904c01pb01&in=S
The crocodile consists of 4 parts and doesn't come assembled (at least not
in set 60157 which I just parted out). So isn't the correct way to include
the four parts in the inventories and the complete assembly as a counterpart
for all sets in the above list?
/Jan
|
|
|
| Author: | normann1974 | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 10:06 | | Subject: | Correct handling of 18904c01pb01 | | Viewed: | 106 times | | Topic: | Catalog | | Status: | Open | |
| Please take a look at:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=18904c01pb01&in=S
The crocodile consists of 4 parts and doesn't come assembled (at least not
in set 60157 which I just parted out). So isn't the correct way to include
the four parts in the inventories and the complete assembly as a counterpart
for all sets in the above list?
/Jan
|
| Author: | L.tide | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 08:27 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 7631-1 | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 2 Part 87552 Trans-Black Panel 1 x 2 x 2 with Side Supports - Hollow Studs (Alternate) (match ID 2)
* Add 3 Part 4865b Yellow Panel 1 x 2 x 1 with Rounded Corners (Alternate) (match ID 3)
Comments from Submitter:
my sealed set (build once and stored isolated with unmixed original parts)
|
|
| Author: | L.tide | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 08:17 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 79106-1 | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change 1 Part Red {3794 Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud (Jumper) (Undetermined Type) to 3794a Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud without Groove (Jumper)} {Alternate to Regular} {match ID 1 to 1}
Comments from Submitter:
my sealed set (build once and stored isolated with unmixed original parts)
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 08:17 | | Subject: | Re: Automated Feedback. | | Viewed: | 50 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, tpr writes:
| | Hi all.
Suggestion ….
Feedback is not always left by the customer. Positive is left most times, and
a customer will always leave negative or neutral if there is something wrong.
One assumes that if nothing is heard from the customer, it must have been delivered
and was ok. Therefore - Can we have an automated positive feedback say after
2 months(or whatever length of time is felt suitable) of order being delivered
for all orders still showing as shipped. It could also be implemented if the
seller has not given feedback.
Thanks
Tracy
|
I can see how many orders your store has filled if I need to see it.
I wish we had an automated tool to stop people from obsessing about their feedback
score and customers not leaving feedback. If you are trying to figure out how
to catch up to the 5 digit people, don't forget that they also have customers
not leaving them feedback.
|
|
| Author: | FreeStorm | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 08:13 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6394-1 | | Viewed: | 15 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, elias3 writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, FreeStorm writes:
Hi
that's right, at that time no other type available.
you can always do a 'change' and not 'add' and 'delete'
Stefaan
|
Ho,I never try to make a change when the parts number is modified.
Thanks for the tips
-Fred
|
|
| Author: | L.tide | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 08:13 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 31025-1 | | Viewed: | 16 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change 3 Part Orange {3794 Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud (Jumper) (Undetermined Type) to 3794a Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud without Groove (Jumper)} {Alternate to Regular}
Comments from Submitter:
my sealed set (build once and stored isolated with unmixed original parts)
|
|
| Author: | L.tide | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 08:11 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 60032-1 | | Viewed: | 14 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change 1 Part Dark Bluish Gray {3794 Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud (Jumper) (Undetermined Type) to 3794a Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud without Groove (Jumper)} {Alternate to Regular}
Comments from Submitter:
my sealed set (build once and stored isolated with unmixed original parts)
|
|
| Author: | L.tide | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 08:10 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 60018-1 | | Viewed: | 12 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change 3 Part Red {3794 Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud (Jumper) (Undetermined Type) to 3794a Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud without Groove (Jumper)}
Comments from Submitter:
my sealed set (build once and stored isolated with unmixed original parts)
|
|
| Author: | L.tide | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 08:07 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 9441-1 | | Viewed: | 20 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change 2 Part Dark Blue {3794 Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud (Jumper) (Undetermined Type) to 3794a Plate, Modified 1 x 2 with 1 Stud without Groove (Jumper)}
Comments from Submitter:
my sealed set (build once and stored with original parts)
|
| Author: | elias3 | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 07:32 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 6394-1 | | Viewed: | 19 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, FreeStorm writes:
Hi
that's right, at that time no other type available.
you can always do a 'change' and not 'add' and 'delete'
Stefaan
|
|
| Author: | elias3 | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 07:29 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 338-2 | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
| In Inventories Requests, VVV writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change {12 to 14} Part Yellow 3003old Brick 2 x 2 without Inside Supports
Comments from Submitter:
missing 2 probably from the table, i did get 14 from my build, looking at box and instruction
|
Hi
you're right, http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=308228
Stefaan
|
|
| Author: | peterab | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 05:46 | | Subject: | Re: Automated Feedback. | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, tpr writes:
| | Hi all.
Suggestion ….
Feedback is not always left by the customer. Positive is left most times, and
a customer will always leave negative or neutral if there is something wrong.
One assumes that if nothing is heard from the customer, it must have been delivered
and was ok. Therefore - Can we have an automated positive feedback say after
2 months(or whatever length of time is felt suitable) of order being delivered
for all orders still showing as shipped. It could also be implemented if the
seller has not given feedback.
Thanks
Tracy
|
This suggestion would remove the option to not leave feedback which is a middle
ground between leaving positive feedback for a good experience and leaving either
neutral or negative feedback knowing it will penalise a seller. I can't see
any point to this except to pacify those who worry that others don't leave
them feedback. Perhaps those people would be better off not worrying so much
about it or being a bit more introspective.
|
|
| Author: | Rob_and_Shelagh | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 05:45 | | Subject: | Re: Automated Feedback. | | Viewed: | 62 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, tpr writes:
| | Hi all.
Suggestion ….
Feedback is not always left by the customer. Positive is left most times, and
a customer will always leave negative or neutral if there is something wrong.
One assumes that if nothing is heard from the customer, it must have been delivered
and was ok. Therefore - Can we have an automated positive feedback say after
2 months(or whatever length of time is felt suitable) of order being delivered
for all orders still showing as shipped. It could also be implemented if the
seller has not given feedback.
Thanks
Tracy
|
No thanks for this one, sorry but if a buyer (or seller) does not leave FB it
does not mean the transaction was positive. Many choose not to leave FB if they
were not completely satisfied as they are worried about retaliation FB if they
leave non positive.
Overall FB is optional, it is not a requirement that FB is left for every order.
Elsewhere (other shopping sites eg Amazon) I rarely leave FB for purchases unless
the experience was particularly good or bad. On here I only want to receive positive
FB if the buyer chose to leave it otherwise it would mean nothing to me and I'd
have no idea what my customers think of my service.
Robert
|
|
| Author: | VVV | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 05:13 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 338-2 | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Change {12 to 14} Part Yellow 3003old Brick 2 x 2 without Inside Supports
Comments from Submitter:
missing 2 probably from the table, i did get 14 from my build, looking at box and instruction
|
|
| Author: | manganschlamm | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 04:46 | | Subject: | Re: Automated Feedback. | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
| In Suggestions, tpr writes:
| | Hi all.
Suggestion ….
Feedback is not always left by the customer. Positive is left most times, and
a customer will always leave negative or neutral if there is something wrong.
One assumes that if nothing is heard from the customer, it must have been delivered
and was ok. Therefore - Can we have an automated positive feedback say after
2 months(or whatever length of time is felt suitable) of order being delivered
for all orders still showing as shipped. It could also be implemented if the
seller has not given feedback.
Thanks
Tracy
|
If feedback would be posted automatically, then we can abandon the feedback system
right away because it makes no sense at all. How can the system decide / judge
automatically if the customer was satisfied? For example, I am very reluctant
as a buyer to post negative or neutral feedback even when I am not too happy
with an order. In such cases I simply do not leave any feedback.
|
|
| Author: | tpr | | Posted: | Jan 13, 2019 04:02 | | Subject: | Automated Feedback. | | Viewed: | 159 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
| Hi all.
Suggestion ….
Feedback is not always left by the customer. Positive is left most times, and
a customer will always leave negative or neutral if there is something wrong.
One assumes that if nothing is heard from the customer, it must have been delivered
and was ok. Therefore - Can we have an automated positive feedback say after
2 months(or whatever length of time is felt suitable) of order being delivered
for all orders still showing as shipped. It could also be implemented if the
seller has not given feedback.
Thanks
Tracy
|
|
