Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Author: | rosies | Posted: | Feb 15, 2019 20:13 | Subject: | Re: Aren't these differences ridiculous? | Viewed: | 86 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Actually,
The powers that be will be removing 3 of them from the catalogue in a few weeks.
In Catalog, brikomania writes:
| I really like the extensive catalog, and think that most of the differences (like
the jumpers or tiles with groove, etc) are really useful.
But when you get to things like this, with a 1 x 2 x 6 arch, having something
like 4 variants, doesn't it make it too hard for sellers AND buyers?
I get the raised arch difference, that is notable, but this thin/thick thing?
|
|
|
Author: | Brick.Door | Posted: | Feb 15, 2019 14:09 | Subject: | Re: 3703 Technic, Brick 1 x 16 with Holes | Viewed: | 44 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, legoman007 writes:
| Hi all,
please add the color brown to the item 3703.
I have some of them and can't see it in the available colors.
Thanks, Martin
|
The list of available colors is generated automatically based on the set inventories.
So unless the item has been cataloged in that color as part of a set, it can't
appear in the list.
You can still list the item for sale the same way you would any other color.
|
Author: | legoman007 | Posted: | Feb 15, 2019 13:47 | Subject: | 3703 Technic, Brick 1 x 16 with Holes | Viewed: | 82 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hi all,
please add the color brown to the item 3703.
I have some of them and can't see it in the available colors.
Thanks, Martin
|
Author: | axaday | Posted: | Feb 14, 2019 10:51 | Subject: | Re: Aren't these differences ridiculous? | Viewed: | 61 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, mfav writes:
| | | I have a loop in every room of my house!
|
I don't know what that means.
|
Loupe, not loop.
|
Ah, that makes more sense. I was unfamiliar with the word, but I looked it up.
I have a magnifier with a light that gets me part numbers 98% of the time, but
Hygrotus' decision to become an entomologist and probably a bunch of grad
school and all just so he would have equipment to get the other 2% just seems
like an overreaction to the situation.
|
Author: | mfav | Posted: | Feb 14, 2019 10:36 | Subject: | Re: Aren't these differences ridiculous? | Viewed: | 48 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| | | I have a loop in every room of my house!
|
I don't know what that means.
|
Loupe, not loop.
|
|
Author: | axaday | Posted: | Feb 14, 2019 09:16 | Subject: | Re: Aren't these differences ridiculous? | Viewed: | 60 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, dcarmine writes:
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| In Catalog, dearlydeparted writes:
| In Catalog, brikomania writes:
| I really like the extensive catalog, and think that most of the differences (like
the jumpers or tiles with groove, etc) are really useful.
But when you get to things like this, with a 1 x 2 x 6 arch, having something
like 4 variants, doesn't it make it too hard for sellers AND buyers?
I get the raised arch difference, that is notable, but this thin/thick thing?
|
To me, yes. I have never been able visually to distinguish the difference between
the two without reinforcement - medium think - thin. I just don't see it,
try as I might.
|
You can always check mold number molded on the part's underside, magnifying
glass maybe needed.
|
Or a light piped thingamajig if you happen to be an entomologist (which is kind
of cheating).
I thought about buying an otoscope the other day so I could see the part number
on the giraffe guy's hat. Then I thought that might be a sign of obsession.
|
but I finally was able to read this mold number
|
Cheater
|
I have a loop in every room of my house!
|
I don't know what that means.
|
|
Author: | hpoort | Posted: | Feb 13, 2019 11:41 | Subject: | Re: Aren't these differences ridiculous? | Viewed: | 52 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, crazylegoman writes:
| YES YES YES YES YES!
This is the #1 upgrade I would want from Bricklink.
David
|
I very much agree. This abiguity should be part of both the items for sale (sellers
not wanting to bother to distinguish) and the wanted lists (buyers not caring
whether they get the on or the other variety).
Taken a bit further, for the wanted lists this might take the form of 'any
shade of green', 'a brick of width 2' or 'the a or c variety
of 4085'.
Wishful thinking, but if this #1 upgrade is implemented in Bricklink XL, I am
all for it, despite whatever changes they might make to the interface.
Hans-Peter
|
|
Author: | crazylegoman | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 23:40 | Subject: | Baby body grip capabilities | Viewed: | 112 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| In the first LEGO Movie 2 preview ( https://youtu.be/XvHSlHhh1gk?t=31 ) the sewer
babies are all holding weapons and the like. Anyway, I was planning on making
my own Apocalypseburg display, and of course, I want to have some sewer babies.
My question is: Is there such a thing as a baby body that has hands that can
grip minifig scale items (3.2mm diameter)?
Thanks,
David
|
|
Author: | Adjour | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 23:14 | Subject: | Re: Aren't these differences ridiculous? | Viewed: | 68 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, brikomania writes:
| I really like the extensive catalog, and think that most of the differences (like
the jumpers or tiles with groove, etc) are really useful.
But when you get to things like this, with a 1 x 2 x 6 arch, having something
like 4 variants, doesn't it make it too hard for sellers AND buyers?
I get the raised arch difference, that is notable, but this thin/thick thing?
|
Well, I personally don't care too much for mocs, but those restoring vintage
sets for themselves or customers DO care about variants.
Clips have a bunch as well.
I'm still learning them all. Its interesting, at minimum, and sometimes a
pain
|
Author: | crazylegoman | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 23:08 | Subject: | Re: Aren't these differences ridiculous? | Viewed: | 56 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| YES YES YES YES YES!
This is the #1 upgrade I would want from Bricklink.
David
|
|
Author: | dcarmine | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 22:22 | Subject: | Re: Aren't these differences ridiculous? | Viewed: | 66 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| In Catalog, dearlydeparted writes:
| In Catalog, brikomania writes:
| I really like the extensive catalog, and think that most of the differences (like
the jumpers or tiles with groove, etc) are really useful.
But when you get to things like this, with a 1 x 2 x 6 arch, having something
like 4 variants, doesn't it make it too hard for sellers AND buyers?
I get the raised arch difference, that is notable, but this thin/thick thing?
|
To me, yes. I have never been able visually to distinguish the difference between
the two without reinforcement - medium think - thin. I just don't see it,
try as I might.
|
You can always check mold number molded on the part's underside, magnifying
glass maybe needed.
|
Or a light piped thingamajig if you happen to be an entomologist (which is kind
of cheating).
I thought about buying an otoscope the other day so I could see the part number
on the giraffe guy's hat. Then I thought that might be a sign of obsession.
|
but I finally was able to read this mold number
|
Cheater
|
I have a loop in every room of my house!
|
|
Author: | elclair | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 18:21 | Subject: | Re: Identify old Lego piece | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, FreeStorm writes:
| In Catalog, FreeStorm writes:
| In Catalog, elclair writes:
| Hey all.
I bought a crate of used Lego and found a few of these pieces I can't identify
(or seem to find in the bricklink Catalog) It's a hollow brick with "Lego"
printed in the studs.(no reference number)
|
|
In case of, you will certainly find those parts:
From old minifigures like that:
|
Perfect, thanks. Appreciate it!
|
|
Author: | FreeStorm | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 16:18 | Subject: | Re: Identify old Lego piece | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, FreeStorm writes:
| In Catalog, elclair writes:
| Hey all.
I bought a crate of used Lego and found a few of these pieces I can't identify
(or seem to find in the bricklink Catalog) It's a hollow brick with "Lego"
printed in the studs.(no reference number)
|
|
In case of, you will certainly find those parts:
From old minifigures like that:
|
|
Author: | FreeStorm | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 16:12 | Subject: | Re: Identify old Lego piece | Viewed: | 46 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, elclair writes:
| Hey all.
I bought a crate of used Lego and found a few of these pieces I can't identify
(or seem to find in the bricklink Catalog) It's a hollow brick with "Lego"
printed in the studs.(no reference number)
|
|
Author: | elclair | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 16:10 | Subject: | Identify old Lego piece | Viewed: | 112 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hey all.
I bought a crate of used Lego and found a few of these pieces I can't identify
(or seem to find in the bricklink Catalog) It's a hollow brick with "Lego"
printed in the studs.(no reference number)
|
|
Author: | mhortar | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 14:33 | Subject: | Re: Aren't these differences ridiculous? | Viewed: | 52 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
|
(There might still be problems though. Say, a buyer parts out a set into a WL,
they are asked if they allow other variants, they accept because they think it
will be cheaper and easier to fullfil, but the set really can only be built with
the one variant )
|
This part is the one that would potentially cause issues. Things like the variations
of 3933/3934 that can cause parts to physically not attach in some scenarios.
That's the first I can think of just because I've experienced it in the
past.
Josh
|
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 14:05 | Subject: | Re: Aren't these differences ridiculous? | Viewed: | 59 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, brikomania writes:
| […]
Thank you for the explanations. I agree that some times, or for some people it
can be useful, but i believe that most of the time it isn't. As suggested,
I think that there should be an option to do a general search for wantlists or
in store, choose if you care about variants or not.
|
The database isn’t made for this, and the only way now is to have “undetermined”
variants, which just adds another variant, fouls the price guide, and makes half
the buyers unhappy.
What would be nice would be “virtual undetermined parts,” and inventories and
sellers should still have to use the determined variants but searches and WLs
wouldn’t.
(There might still be problems though. Say, a buyer parts out a set into a WL,
they are asked if they allow other variants, they accept because they think it
will be cheaper and easier to fullfil, but the set really can only be built with
the one variant )
But that means modifying the database and the site too deeply, at least for now….
|
|
Author: | nectara | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 13:39 | Subject: | Re: Allow AFOLs to "Bricklink" the ADP sets | Viewed: | 60 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Suggestions, Brick.Door writes:
| There are no plans to do so, but I hope that once the regular sales period is
finished Bricklink allows the inventory of these sets to be added to the catalog
so people can add them to a want list and buy the parts they need to build them.
Since they use mostly common parts, I think many AFOLs would prefer to build
them with the parts in their own collection, and just buy any ones they are missing.
Not only would this generate revenue for Bricklink by increased sales, it would
be an olive branch to the sellers who have been completely excluded from this
promotion.
Bricklink has done so much to build the AFOL community and it has become a verb
within our vocabulary (much like Google has in the general population). It would
be a sad irony if the sets created by Bricklink to celebrate AFOLs cannot be
Bricklinked by AFOLs.
|
I voted no.
They are MOC's not officials Lego sets.
Regards
Nectara
|
|
Author: | mhortar | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 13:29 | Subject: | Re: Allow AFOLs to "Bricklink" the ADP sets | Viewed: | 55 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Suggestions, Teup writes:
| In Suggestions, mhortar writes:
| In Suggestions, Brick.Door writes:
| There are no plans to do so, but I hope that once the regular sales period is
finished Bricklink allows the inventory of these sets to be added to the catalog
so people can add them to a want list and buy the parts they need to build them.
Since they use mostly common parts, I think many AFOLs would prefer to build
them with the parts in their own collection, and just buy any ones they are missing.
Not only would this generate revenue for Bricklink by increased sales, it would
be an olive branch to the sellers who have been completely excluded from this
promotion.
Bricklink has done so much to build the AFOL community and it has become a verb
within our vocabulary (much like Google has in the general population). It would
be a sad irony if the sets created by Bricklink to celebrate AFOLs cannot be
Bricklinked by AFOLs.
|
From what I understand from reading about these sets, these aren't going
to be officially recognized LEGO sets. If that's the case, I don't feel
like they belong in the catalog. Someone will post the inventory somewhere (from
what I understand, it happens with most popular MOCs), so there is nothing stopping
a buyer from creating their own wanted list and purchase the parts without having
the set in the catalog.
Josh
|
They're still more official than BrickArms, which is also in the catalog...
Plus, the whole "exciting" part about the whole project, according to BL itself,
is the fact that it's an official cooperation with the LEGO Group.
So yes, I definitely see the irony.
|
I objected to adding BrickArms as well, for what it's worth. Fat lot of good
that did
Josh
|
|
Author: | Teup | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 13:07 | Subject: | Re: Allow AFOLs to "Bricklink" the ADP sets | Viewed: | 52 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Suggestions, mhortar writes:
| In Suggestions, Brick.Door writes:
| There are no plans to do so, but I hope that once the regular sales period is
finished Bricklink allows the inventory of these sets to be added to the catalog
so people can add them to a want list and buy the parts they need to build them.
Since they use mostly common parts, I think many AFOLs would prefer to build
them with the parts in their own collection, and just buy any ones they are missing.
Not only would this generate revenue for Bricklink by increased sales, it would
be an olive branch to the sellers who have been completely excluded from this
promotion.
Bricklink has done so much to build the AFOL community and it has become a verb
within our vocabulary (much like Google has in the general population). It would
be a sad irony if the sets created by Bricklink to celebrate AFOLs cannot be
Bricklinked by AFOLs.
|
From what I understand from reading about these sets, these aren't going
to be officially recognized LEGO sets. If that's the case, I don't feel
like they belong in the catalog. Someone will post the inventory somewhere (from
what I understand, it happens with most popular MOCs), so there is nothing stopping
a buyer from creating their own wanted list and purchase the parts without having
the set in the catalog.
Josh
|
They're still more official than BrickArms, which is also in the catalog...
Plus, the whole "exciting" part about the whole project, according to BL itself,
is the fact that it's an official cooperation with the LEGO Group.
So yes, I definitely see the irony.
|
|
Author: | brikomania | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 13:06 | Subject: | Re: Aren't these differences ridiculous? | Viewed: | 55 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, brikomania writes:
| I really like the extensive catalog, and think that most of the differences (like
the jumpers or tiles with groove, etc) are really useful.
But when you get to things like this, with a 1 x 2 x 6 arch, having something
like 4 variants, doesn't it make it too hard for sellers AND buyers?
I get the raised arch difference, that is notable, but this thin/thick thing?
|
Thank you for the explanations. I agree that some times, or for some people it
can be useful, but i believe that most of the time it isn't. As suggested,
I think that there should be an option to do a general search for wantlists or
in store, choose if you care about variants or not.
Many buyers ask if i have a part, for example, a 1 x 1 with clip, and I do, but
they had the O clip in their wanted lists, and i had the U clip, but they didn't
care for either.
|
|
Author: | mhortar | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 12:55 | Subject: | Re: Allow AFOLs to "Bricklink" the ADP sets | Viewed: | 53 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Suggestions, Brick.Door writes:
| There are no plans to do so, but I hope that once the regular sales period is
finished Bricklink allows the inventory of these sets to be added to the catalog
so people can add them to a want list and buy the parts they need to build them.
Since they use mostly common parts, I think many AFOLs would prefer to build
them with the parts in their own collection, and just buy any ones they are missing.
Not only would this generate revenue for Bricklink by increased sales, it would
be an olive branch to the sellers who have been completely excluded from this
promotion.
Bricklink has done so much to build the AFOL community and it has become a verb
within our vocabulary (much like Google has in the general population). It would
be a sad irony if the sets created by Bricklink to celebrate AFOLs cannot be
Bricklinked by AFOLs.
|
From what I understand from reading about these sets, these aren't going
to be officially recognized LEGO sets. If that's the case, I don't feel
like they belong in the catalog. Someone will post the inventory somewhere (from
what I understand, it happens with most popular MOCs), so there is nothing stopping
a buyer from creating their own wanted list and purchase the parts without having
the set in the catalog.
Josh
|
|
Author: | Brick.Door | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 12:46 | Subject: | Allow AFOLs to "Bricklink" the ADP sets | Viewed: | 194 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| There are no plans to do so, but I hope that once the regular sales period is
finished Bricklink allows the inventory of these sets to be added to the catalog
so people can add them to a want list and buy the parts they need to build them.
Since they use mostly common parts, I think many AFOLs would prefer to build
them with the parts in their own collection, and just buy any ones they are missing.
Not only would this generate revenue for Bricklink by increased sales, it would
be an olive branch to the sellers who have been completely excluded from this
promotion.
Bricklink has done so much to build the AFOL community and it has become a verb
within our vocabulary (much like Google has in the general population). It would
be a sad irony if the sets created by Bricklink to celebrate AFOLs cannot be
Bricklinked by AFOLs.
|
|
Author: | yorbrick | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 11:32 | Subject: | Re: Aren't these differences ridiculous? | Viewed: | 62 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| In Catalog, brikomania writes:
| I really like the extensive catalog, and think that most of the differences (like
the jumpers or tiles with groove, etc) are really useful.
But when you get to things like this, with a 1 x 2 x 6 arch, having something
like 4 variants, doesn't it make it too hard for sellers AND buyers?
I get the raised arch difference, that is notable, but this thin/thick thing?
|
It would be nice if the catalog had the sophistication to have a metapart that
would collect listings of all three in a search if someone really didn't
care which.
|
I guess it does in a way as you can search for "arch 1 x 6 x 2 -curved -pattern"
if you don't care which one you get, but it only really works for searches
and not wants lists. So yes having a metadata tag to link them would be good.
Same for a number of other parts with minor variations that may be inconsequential
for some people but important for others.
|
|
Author: | axaday | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 10:42 | Subject: | Re: Aren't these differences ridiculous? | Viewed: | 72 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| In Catalog, dearlydeparted writes:
| In Catalog, brikomania writes:
| I really like the extensive catalog, and think that most of the differences (like
the jumpers or tiles with groove, etc) are really useful.
But when you get to things like this, with a 1 x 2 x 6 arch, having something
like 4 variants, doesn't it make it too hard for sellers AND buyers?
I get the raised arch difference, that is notable, but this thin/thick thing?
|
To me, yes. I have never been able visually to distinguish the difference between
the two without reinforcement - medium think - thin. I just don't see it,
try as I might.
|
You can always check mold number molded on the part's underside, magnifying
glass maybe needed.
|
Or a light piped thingamajig if you happen to be an entomologist (which is kind
of cheating).
I thought about buying an otoscope the other day so I could see the part number
on the giraffe guy's hat. Then I thought that might be a sign of obsession.
|
but I finally was able to read this mold number
|
Cheater
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 10:36 | Subject: | Re: Aren't these differences ridiculous? | Viewed: | 63 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, axaday writes:
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| In Catalog, dearlydeparted writes:
| In Catalog, brikomania writes:
| I really like the extensive catalog, and think that most of the differences (like
the jumpers or tiles with groove, etc) are really useful.
But when you get to things like this, with a 1 x 2 x 6 arch, having something
like 4 variants, doesn't it make it too hard for sellers AND buyers?
I get the raised arch difference, that is notable, but this thin/thick thing?
|
To me, yes. I have never been able visually to distinguish the difference between
the two without reinforcement - medium think - thin. I just don't see it,
try as I might.
|
You can always check mold number molded on the part's underside, magnifying
glass maybe needed.
|
Or a light piped thingamajig if you happen to be an entomologist (which is kind
of cheating).
I thought about buying an otoscope the other day so I could see the part number
on the giraffe guy's hat. Then I thought that might be a sign of obsession.
|
but I finally was able to read this mold number
|
|
Author: | axaday | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 10:28 | Subject: | Re: Aren't these differences ridiculous? | Viewed: | 68 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, brikomania writes:
| I really like the extensive catalog, and think that most of the differences (like
the jumpers or tiles with groove, etc) are really useful.
But when you get to things like this, with a 1 x 2 x 6 arch, having something
like 4 variants, doesn't it make it too hard for sellers AND buyers?
I get the raised arch difference, that is notable, but this thin/thick thing?
|
It would be nice if the catalog had the sophistication to have a metapart that
would collect listings of all three in a search if someone really didn't
care which.
|
|
Author: | axaday | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 10:27 | Subject: | Re: Aren't these differences ridiculous? | Viewed: | 72 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| In Catalog, dearlydeparted writes:
| In Catalog, brikomania writes:
| I really like the extensive catalog, and think that most of the differences (like
the jumpers or tiles with groove, etc) are really useful.
But when you get to things like this, with a 1 x 2 x 6 arch, having something
like 4 variants, doesn't it make it too hard for sellers AND buyers?
I get the raised arch difference, that is notable, but this thin/thick thing?
|
To me, yes. I have never been able visually to distinguish the difference between
the two without reinforcement - medium think - thin. I just don't see it,
try as I might.
|
You can always check mold number molded on the part's underside, magnifying
glass maybe needed.
|
Or a light piped thingamajig if you happen to be an entomologist (which is kind
of cheating).
I thought about buying an otoscope the other day so I could see the part number
on the giraffe guy's hat. Then I thought that might be a sign of obsession.
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 08:38 | Subject: | Re: Aren't these differences ridiculous? | Viewed: | 89 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, brikomania writes:
| I really like the extensive catalog, and think that most of the differences (like
the jumpers or tiles with groove, etc) are really useful.
But when you get to things like this, with a 1 x 2 x 6 arch, having something
like 4 variants, doesn't it make it too hard for sellers AND buyers?
I get the raised arch difference, that is notable, but this thin/thick thing?
|
There is a reason for the multiple entries, and that reason is because LEGO made
three variations of that part with different purposes in mind for each one. Some
of the builds that use one variation of the arch cannot be built using either
of the other two.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 08:08 | Subject: | Re: Aren't these differences ridiculous? | Viewed: | 88 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, dearlydeparted writes:
| In Catalog, brikomania writes:
| I really like the extensive catalog, and think that most of the differences (like
the jumpers or tiles with groove, etc) are really useful.
But when you get to things like this, with a 1 x 2 x 6 arch, having something
like 4 variants, doesn't it make it too hard for sellers AND buyers?
I get the raised arch difference, that is notable, but this thin/thick thing?
|
To me, yes. I have never been able visually to distinguish the difference between
the two without reinforcement - medium think - thin. I just don't see it,
try as I might.
|
You can always check mold number molded on the part's underside, magnifying
glass maybe needed.
|
|
Author: | dearlydeparted | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 08:02 | Subject: | Re: Aren't these differences ridiculous? | Viewed: | 92 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, brikomania writes:
| I really like the extensive catalog, and think that most of the differences (like
the jumpers or tiles with groove, etc) are really useful.
But when you get to things like this, with a 1 x 2 x 6 arch, having something
like 4 variants, doesn't it make it too hard for sellers AND buyers?
I get the raised arch difference, that is notable, but this thin/thick thing?
|
To me, yes. I have never been able visually to distinguish the difference between
the two without reinforcement - medium think - thin. I just don't see it,
try as I might.
|
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 07:48 | Subject: | Re: Aren't these differences ridiculous? | Viewed: | 84 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| In Catalog, brikomania writes:
| I really like the extensive catalog, and think that most of the differences (like
the jumpers or tiles with groove, etc) are really useful.
But when you get to things like this, with a 1 x 2 x 6 arch, having something
like 4 variants, doesn't it make it too hard for sellers AND buyers?
|
|
Three variants. Don’t exaggerate, you’re showing them
* | | 3307 Arch 1 x 6 x 2 - Thick Top with Reinforced Underside Parts: Arch |
* | | 15254 Arch 1 x 6 x 2 - Medium Thick Top without Reinforced Underside Parts: Arch |
* | | 12939 Arch 1 x 6 x 2 - Thin Top without Reinforced Underside Parts: Arch |
| | I get the raised arch difference, that is notable, but this thin/thick thing?
|
The thin / thick thing is described in the notes, and mm dimensions given. Personally,
the difference between the old and new style (with/without the reinforcement)
is enough, but I I can understand why the different variants are there.
|
Yes, the variants are important:
1. You can fit some parts under the thin and medium thick parts that you can’t
fit under the thick one. E.g.
2. Collectors find it very important to get the right variant.
The odd part here would be the thin one: it was short lived (a year). Too fragile?
Too thin (it leaves a noticeable gap)?
Anyway, it’s here and came before the medium thick and was already in the catalogue
(2013) when the medium thick version was spotted / included in the catalogue
(2016).
There was no reason to merge thin and medium thick then and there’s no much reason
to do it now as we would still need to keep the old one.
Wouldn’t it be as confusing to have a “thick” version and “more or less thin”
one?
|
|
Author: | yorbrick | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 06:34 | Subject: | Re: Aren't these differences ridiculous? | Viewed: | 95 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, brikomania writes:
| I really like the extensive catalog, and think that most of the differences (like
the jumpers or tiles with groove, etc) are really useful.
But when you get to things like this, with a 1 x 2 x 6 arch, having something
like 4 variants, doesn't it make it too hard for sellers AND buyers?
I get the raised arch difference, that is notable, but this thin/thick thing?
|
The thin / thick thing is described in the notes, and mm dimensions given. Personally,
the difference between the old and new style (with/without the reinforcement)
is enough, but I I can understand why the different variants are there.
|
|
Author: | brikomania | Posted: | Feb 12, 2019 06:29 | Subject: | Aren't these differences ridiculous? | Viewed: | 331 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I really like the extensive catalog, and think that most of the differences (like
the jumpers or tiles with groove, etc) are really useful.
But when you get to things like this, with a 1 x 2 x 6 arch, having something
like 4 variants, doesn't it make it too hard for sellers AND buyers?
I get the raised arch difference, that is notable, but this thin/thick thing?
|
|
|
Author: | Brickitty | Posted: | Feb 10, 2019 13:10 | Subject: | Re: Minifigure, Utensil Tool Screwdriver - Narrow | Viewed: | 44 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, stecre writes:
| Why is this part so expensive in DBG??
|
The long answer:
It only came out in 2005, and for all intents and purposes, the only fully-distributed
set it was in was 7251 Darth Vader Transformation. Until Lego released an updated
version of that in 2017, it was a fairly high-demand set because that scene in
Revenge of the Sith is iconic. But sets released in 2004-2005 typically had short
shelf lives because of Lego's color transformation and changes in the company.
So higher demand + lower supply = a fairly expensive set -- it still averages
$28 for 53 pieces, or $0.53/piece, and I remember seeing it go for $35-$40
a few years back. Since there are very few exclusive parts in the set besides
the figs, the few exclusive/rare parts get priced up extremely high, likely because
of people trying to Bricklink the set.
|
|
Author: | Killermike | Posted: | Feb 10, 2019 13:01 | Subject: | Re: Minifigure, Utensil Tool Screwdriver - Narrow | Viewed: | 31 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Only available in 3 sets, of which one is an exclusive.
Basic Supply and Demand, I should think
|
Author: | stecre | Posted: | Feb 10, 2019 12:41 | Subject: | Minifigure, Utensil Tool Screwdriver - Narrow | Viewed: | 89 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Why is this part so expensive in DBG??
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | Feb 9, 2019 15:49 | Subject: | Re: Why? | Viewed: | 76 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, SgtPepper writes:
They probably listed them for sale before the inventory was completed. If they
were asked to move them to the correct entries that are now in the catalog, they
probably would.
Randy
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Feb 8, 2019 23:43 | Subject: | Re: Please approve, in hand | Viewed: | 61 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| I just noticed that these sets require a Target credit card to purchase.
From this point on I will make an extra effort to ensure that I purchase in a
manner that limits the direct benefit to TLC. All these exclusives seem to do
is create a rift in their loyal fan base. They end up solely in the 2nd hand
market at inflated prices.
In Catalog, starbeanie writes:
| Sweet Mayhem and Benny will be limited also.
|
|
|
Author: | Dalika | Posted: | Feb 8, 2019 17:14 | Subject: | Re: Please approve, in hand | Viewed: | 33 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Dalika writes:
| In Catalog, starbeanie writes:
| Sweet Mayhem and Benny will be limited also.
|
It looks like Sweet Mayhem will be, or is @ Target. It looks like a RedCard
exclusive? Haven't seen Benny yet.
|
Edit: Benny is @ Target as well.
|
|
In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| In Catalog, Rakali writes:
| In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| I'm beginning to grow tired with Lego. I visit eurobricks, brickset, brothersbrick,
rebrickable, and s@h as often as possible and still cannot seem to stay in the
Lego loop. Last year(?) I missed out on the classic set exclusives, some s@h
specials, and now these special sets.
|
41999 was bad enough, but that was more quantity, a smaller audience, and worldwide.
Releasing these with no notice and just to Wal-Mart in the US is a dick move.
It's not like they are fringe characters either, a lot of people like these
two, it just doesn't make sense to not release these popular characters worldwide
to take advantage of the movie.
I'm all for scumbag reselling, you have to hate the game not the player.
LEGO shouldn't be enabling this in the first place, just like 41999, just
like the series 18 Policeman. I'm all for taking advantage as a seller, but
I don't agree the opportunity should exist in the first place.
|
I'm hoping they do release worldwide, and not limited. It would be stupid
not to. If they don't release Emmet and Wyldstyle, then there is no point
in wider releases of Sweet Mayhem and Benny.
|
|
|
|
|
Author: | Dalika | Posted: | Feb 8, 2019 17:12 | Subject: | Re: Please approve, in hand | Viewed: | 31 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, starbeanie writes:
| Sweet Mayhem and Benny will be limited also.
|
It looks like Sweet Mayhem will be, or is @ Target. It looks like a RedCard
exclusive? Haven't seen Benny yet.
|
In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| In Catalog, Rakali writes:
| In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| I'm beginning to grow tired with Lego. I visit eurobricks, brickset, brothersbrick,
rebrickable, and s@h as often as possible and still cannot seem to stay in the
Lego loop. Last year(?) I missed out on the classic set exclusives, some s@h
specials, and now these special sets.
|
41999 was bad enough, but that was more quantity, a smaller audience, and worldwide.
Releasing these with no notice and just to Wal-Mart in the US is a dick move.
It's not like they are fringe characters either, a lot of people like these
two, it just doesn't make sense to not release these popular characters worldwide
to take advantage of the movie.
I'm all for scumbag reselling, you have to hate the game not the player.
LEGO shouldn't be enabling this in the first place, just like 41999, just
like the series 18 Policeman. I'm all for taking advantage as a seller, but
I don't agree the opportunity should exist in the first place.
|
I'm hoping they do release worldwide, and not limited. It would be stupid
not to. If they don't release Emmet and Wyldstyle, then there is no point
in wider releases of Sweet Mayhem and Benny.
|
|
|
|
Author: | starbeanie | Posted: | Feb 8, 2019 16:36 | Subject: | Re: Please approve, in hand | Viewed: | 37 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Sweet Mayhem and Benny will be limited also.
In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| In Catalog, Rakali writes:
| In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| I'm beginning to grow tired with Lego. I visit eurobricks, brickset, brothersbrick,
rebrickable, and s@h as often as possible and still cannot seem to stay in the
Lego loop. Last year(?) I missed out on the classic set exclusives, some s@h
specials, and now these special sets.
|
41999 was bad enough, but that was more quantity, a smaller audience, and worldwide.
Releasing these with no notice and just to Wal-Mart in the US is a dick move.
It's not like they are fringe characters either, a lot of people like these
two, it just doesn't make sense to not release these popular characters worldwide
to take advantage of the movie.
I'm all for scumbag reselling, you have to hate the game not the player.
LEGO shouldn't be enabling this in the first place, just like 41999, just
like the series 18 Policeman. I'm all for taking advantage as a seller, but
I don't agree the opportunity should exist in the first place.
|
I'm hoping they do release worldwide, and not limited. It would be stupid
not to. If they don't release Emmet and Wyldstyle, then there is no point
in wider releases of Sweet Mayhem and Benny.
|
|
|
Author: | yorbrick | Posted: | Feb 8, 2019 04:19 | Subject: | Re: Please approve, in hand | Viewed: | 63 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Rakali writes:
| In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| I'm beginning to grow tired with Lego. I visit eurobricks, brickset, brothersbrick,
rebrickable, and s@h as often as possible and still cannot seem to stay in the
Lego loop. Last year(?) I missed out on the classic set exclusives, some s@h
specials, and now these special sets.
|
41999 was bad enough, but that was more quantity, a smaller audience, and worldwide.
Releasing these with no notice and just to Wal-Mart in the US is a dick move.
It's not like they are fringe characters either, a lot of people like these
two, it just doesn't make sense to not release these popular characters worldwide
to take advantage of the movie.
I'm all for scumbag reselling, you have to hate the game not the player.
LEGO shouldn't be enabling this in the first place, just like 41999, just
like the series 18 Policeman. I'm all for taking advantage as a seller, but
I don't agree the opportunity should exist in the first place.
|
I'm hoping they do release worldwide, and not limited. It would be stupid
not to. If they don't release Emmet and Wyldstyle, then there is no point
in wider releases of Sweet Mayhem and Benny.
|
|
Author: | SteinchendeaIer | Posted: | Feb 8, 2019 02:25 | Subject: | Problem with new Sticker Items | Viewed: | 121 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello everybody,
I have created a part with stickers that are not yet in my catalog and a new
minifigure that is currently available in Germany directly in the store to buy
Nothing has been released so far, so I wanted to ask if I did something wrong?
greeting
Florian
|
|
|
Author: | Rakali | Posted: | Feb 7, 2019 23:13 | Subject: | Re: Please approve, in hand | Viewed: | 94 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| I'm beginning to grow tired with Lego. I visit eurobricks, brickset, brothersbrick,
rebrickable, and s@h as often as possible and still cannot seem to stay in the
Lego loop. Last year(?) I missed out on the classic set exclusives, some s@h
specials, and now these special sets.
|
41999 was bad enough, but that was more quantity, a smaller audience, and worldwide.
Releasing these with no notice and just to Wal-Mart in the US is a dick move.
It's not like they are fringe characters either, a lot of people like these
two, it just doesn't make sense to not release these popular characters worldwide
to take advantage of the movie.
I'm all for scumbag reselling, you have to hate the game not the player.
LEGO shouldn't be enabling this in the first place, just like 41999, just
like the series 18 Policeman. I'm all for taking advantage as a seller, but
I don't agree the opportunity should exist in the first place.
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Feb 7, 2019 21:08 | Subject: | Re: Please approve, in hand | Viewed: | 83 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| I'm beginning to grow tired with Lego. I visit eurobricks, brickset, brothersbrick,
rebrickable, and s@h as often as possible and still cannot seem to stay in the
Lego loop. Last year(?) I missed out on the classic set exclusives, some s@h
specials, and now these special sets.
In Catalog, Dalika writes:
| In Catalog Requests, speshy writes:
| Are those the limited edition brickheadz? Got any pics?
K
|
I saw them and thought they were WM exclusives.
|
In Catalog Requests, starbeanie writes:
| Please approve. I received them today.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Author: | starbeanie | Posted: | Feb 7, 2019 19:37 | Subject: | Re: Please approve, in hand | Viewed: | 70 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| My phone wont take a pic small enough to upload!!!
In Catalog, speshy writes:
| Are those the limited edition brickheadz? Got any pics?
K
In Catalog Requests, starbeanie writes:
| Please approve. I received them today.
Thanks.
|
|
|
Author: | Dalika | Posted: | Feb 7, 2019 18:15 | Subject: | Re: Please approve, in hand | Viewed: | 75 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, speshy writes:
| Are those the limited edition brickheadz? Got any pics?
K
|
I saw them and thought they were WM exclusives.
|
In Catalog Requests, starbeanie writes:
| Please approve. I received them today.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Author: | starbeanie | Posted: | Feb 7, 2019 18:05 | Subject: | Re: Please approve, in hand | Viewed: | 64 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Limited to 5000. So, not exactly rare. I can post pics in a bit. Out at dinner
now.
In Catalog Requests, speshy writes:
| Are those the limited edition brickheadz? Got any pics?
K
In Catalog Requests, starbeanie writes:
| Please approve. I received them today.
Thanks.
|
|
|
Author: | speshy | Posted: | Feb 7, 2019 17:57 | Subject: | Re: Please approve, in hand | Viewed: | 66 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Are those the limited edition brickheadz? Got any pics?
K
In Catalog Requests, starbeanie writes:
| Please approve. I received them today.
Thanks.
|
|
Author: | starbeanie | Posted: | Feb 7, 2019 17:34 | Subject: | Please approve, in hand | Viewed: | 206 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Please approve. I received them today.
Thanks.
|
Author: | Adjour | Posted: | Feb 7, 2019 15:57 | Subject: | Re: 5987 Instructions | Viewed: | 23 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, baylit writes:
| It appears that there were 2 versions of the instructions with different cover
page orientations - 1 landscape and 1 portrait.
Perhaps this has happened a lot. First time I've noticed it.
See image.
How is this addressed in the Bricklink inventory catalog - or should it be?
|
I encounter this occasionally, I just make a note in the description. I do think
however that images and notes should be added to the catalog.
I've also seen pictures of "instructions" that are likely just images of
the box art (shape is wrong etc)
|
|
Author: | moreshelfspace | Posted: | Feb 7, 2019 13:52 | Subject: | Re: Standardize name for belt with ammunition | Viewed: | 34 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Awesome, thank you!
In Catalog, randyf writes:
| In Catalog, kurotakajo writes:
| Some torsos have "ammunition belt" in their description and others "bandolier".
My personal vote is "ammunition belt". It makes it difficult to find a torso
in the catalog when you don't know the character or theme.
For example: "Torso Pharaoh's Quest Tan Waistcoat, White Shirt, Bandolier
and Silver Buckle Pattern (Jake Raines) / Tan Arms / Yellow Hands" (973pb0781c01)
"Torso Monster Fighters with Ammunition Belt Pattern / Dark Tan Arms / Yellow
Hands" (973pb1113c01)
These two items are similar-looking.
|
You can submit any name change you would like using the following form:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp?itemType=P
The catalog admins will then decide whether the change will be accepted or not.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | Feb 6, 2019 22:52 | Subject: | Re: NJO399 and NJO410 | Viewed: | 27 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Crafteewon writes:
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| In Catalog, Crafteewon writes:
| In Catalog, Crafteewon writes:
| NJO399 and NJO 410.
Just wondering if these should be moved to the ninjago minifigure category instead
of the junior category.
Just thinking someone looking for Ninjago wouldn’t look under Junior to find
them.
Also if someone can tell me how to list them so the link and photo appears it
would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Edward
|
Sorry should have clarified I am wanting to know how to have the link and photo
appear in the post.
|
Type [m = njo399] and [m = njo410] without the spaces around the
equal signs.
Cheers,
Randy
|
Thank you.
|
I think you meant to put this one:
|
|
Author: | baylit | Posted: | Feb 6, 2019 22:27 | Subject: | Re: 5987 Instructions | Viewed: | 22 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| I didn't take a picture but the back side is similarly rotated differently
for each version
In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| Interesting find. I have the "landscape" print version and can confirm that
the opposite side is not the "portrait" print side you've shown.
In Catalog, baylit writes:
| It appears that there were 2 versions of the instructions with different cover
page orientations - 1 landscape and 1 portrait.
Perhaps this has happened a lot. First time I've noticed it.
See image.
How is this addressed in the Bricklink inventory catalog - or should it be?
|
|
|
|
Author: | baylit | Posted: | Feb 6, 2019 22:26 | Subject: | Re: 5987 Instructions | Viewed: | 26 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| I didn't take a picture, but the reverse are similarly rotated differently
In Catalog, tEoS writes:
| Interesting find. I have the "landscape" print version and can confirm that
the opposite side is not the "portrait" print side you've shown.
In Catalog, baylit writes:
| It appears that there were 2 versions of the instructions with different cover
page orientations - 1 landscape and 1 portrait.
Perhaps this has happened a lot. First time I've noticed it.
See image.
How is this addressed in the Bricklink inventory catalog - or should it be?
|
|
|
|
Author: | Crafteewon | Posted: | Feb 6, 2019 22:15 | Subject: | Re: NJO399 and NJO410 | Viewed: | 24 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| In Catalog, Crafteewon writes:
| In Catalog, Crafteewon writes:
| NJO399 and NJO 410.
Just wondering if these should be moved to the ninjago minifigure category instead
of the junior category.
Just thinking someone looking for Ninjago wouldn’t look under Junior to find
them.
Also if someone can tell me how to list them so the link and photo appears it
would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Edward
|
Sorry should have clarified I am wanting to know how to have the link and photo
appear in the post.
|
Type [m = njo399] and [m = njo410] without the spaces around the
equal signs.
Cheers,
Randy
|
Thank you.
|
|
Author: | tEoS | Posted: | Feb 6, 2019 22:13 | Subject: | Re: 5987 Instructions | Viewed: | 27 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Interesting find. I have the "landscape" print version and can confirm that
the opposite side is not the "portrait" print side you've shown.
In Catalog, baylit writes:
| It appears that there were 2 versions of the instructions with different cover
page orientations - 1 landscape and 1 portrait.
Perhaps this has happened a lot. First time I've noticed it.
See image.
How is this addressed in the Bricklink inventory catalog - or should it be?
|
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | Feb 6, 2019 22:03 | Subject: | Re: NJO399 and NJO410 | Viewed: | 27 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Crafteewon writes:
| In Catalog, Crafteewon writes:
| NJO399 and NJO 410.
Just wondering if these should be moved to the ninjago minifigure category instead
of the junior category.
Just thinking someone looking for Ninjago wouldn’t look under Junior to find
them.
Also if someone can tell me how to list them so the link and photo appears it
would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Edward
|
Sorry should have clarified I am wanting to know how to have the link and photo
appear in the post.
|
Type [m = njo399] and [m = njo410] without the spaces around the
equal signs.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
Author: | baylit | Posted: | Feb 6, 2019 21:54 | Subject: | 5987 Instructions | Viewed: | 67 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| It appears that there were 2 versions of the instructions with different cover
page orientations - 1 landscape and 1 portrait.
Perhaps this has happened a lot. First time I've noticed it.
See image.
How is this addressed in the Bricklink inventory catalog - or should it be?
|
|
Author: | Crafteewon | Posted: | Feb 6, 2019 21:52 | Subject: | Re: NJO399 and NJO410 | Viewed: | 16 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Crafteewon writes:
| NJO399 and NJO 410.
Just wondering if these should be moved to the ninjago minifigure category instead
of the junior category.
Just thinking someone looking for Ninjago wouldn’t look under Junior to find
them.
Also if someone can tell me how to list them so the link and photo appears it
would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Edward
|
Sorry should have clarified I am wanting to know how to have the link and photo
appear in the post.
|
|
Author: | Crafteewon | Posted: | Feb 6, 2019 21:43 | Subject: | NJO399 and NJO410 | Viewed: | 70 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| NJO399 and NJO 410.
Just wondering if these should be moved to the ninjago minifigure category instead
of the junior category.
Just thinking someone looking for Ninjago wouldn’t look under Junior to find
them.
Also if someone can tell me how to list them so the link and photo appears it
would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Edward
|
|
Author: | jodawill | Posted: | Feb 6, 2019 02:13 | Subject: | Re: Did the Lego Pirates books come in paperback? | Viewed: | 32 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, jodawill writes:
| When I look up these Lego Pirates books on Amazon, they're mostly listed
as paperbacks. Does anyone know if they were actually ever printed in paperback,
or are those Amazon listings wrong? Bricklink only shows them as being printed
in hardcover.
|
I ordered all of them from Amazon a few days ago, so I guess I'll find out.
3 of the ones I bought were listed as paperbacks, but I couldn't find any
evidence that paperbacks actually exist.
|
|
Author: | bb1328448 | Posted: | Feb 5, 2019 17:06 | Subject: | Remix Emmet Blind Bag ID Number? | Viewed: | 61 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hi, so my son’s name is Emmett and I got him the first LEGO Movie Emmet and am
trying to find him the second Emmet for LEGO Movie 2. Does anyone know the identification
number for the blind bag Remix Emmet? Someone said it was 41S8, but that was
Scare Crow...
|
|
Author: | TyresOFlaherty | Posted: | Feb 5, 2019 12:37 | Subject: | Re: Questions about Unikitty / Counterparts | Viewed: | 52 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Randy,
Thanks for getting back to me so quickly! (And nice avatar, Blacktron II forever!)
That makes sense, and my only counter-point to that is that Brickset uses info
from here to list minifigures, and being a collector, it's nice to be able
to have each of the alternate figs listed in a collection. Additionally, it gives
sellers more options to sell unique minifigs as well.
Just giving my two cents.
Thanks!
-Kevin
P.S. I'm curious how those decisions are made, is there one person that decides
on all these things, or do a bunch of admins just come to an agreement? Just
wondering
In Catalog Requests, randyf writes:
| The minifigs listed as Counterparts in any of these sets should not have been
accepted to the catalog. They do not fit the definition for how BrickLink defines
the minifigs, and the alternate faces would be considered play scenarios. I will
need to discuss this with the other admins, but my first thoughts are to *not*
accept further Counterpart figures and reverse the decision of the prior figures
and have them marked for deletion.
Cheers,
Randy
In Catalog, TyresOFlaherty writes:
| I noticed that some of the sets from TLM and TLM2 that have Unikitty with alternate
face pieces have her listed as a Counterpart and others do not.
Just wondering if I could get the pending minifigs approved so that these are
all consistent.
Thanks!
COMCON040-1
tlm080: Cheerykitty (Cheery Kitty)
tlm081: Cutesykitty (Cutesy Kitty)
70818 - Double Decker Couch
tlm093: Unikitty - Puzzled, Sitting
tlm097: Unikitty - Unikitty - Eyes Watering, Sitting - Waiting for Approval
COMCON057-1
tlm101: Rage Kitty
tlm102: Angry Kitty
70822 - Unikitty's Sweetest Friends EVER!
tlm126: Unikitty - Lopsided Smile
tlm168: Unikitty - Eyes Closed, Smile with Tongue Out - Waiting for Approval
70831 - Emmet's Dream House/Rescue Rocket!
tlm147: Unikitty - Warrior Kitty, Sleeping
tlm146: Unikitty - Warrior Kitty, Frowning - Waiting for Approva
|
|
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | Feb 5, 2019 12:26 | Subject: | Re: Questions about Unikitty / Counterparts | Viewed: | 45 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| The minifigs listed as Counterparts in any of these sets should not have been
accepted to the catalog. They do not fit the definition for how BrickLink defines
the minifigs, and the alternate faces would be considered play scenarios. I will
need to discuss this with the other admins, but my first thoughts are to *not*
accept further Counterpart figures and reverse the decision of the prior figures
and have them marked for deletion.
Cheers,
Randy
In Catalog, TyresOFlaherty writes:
| I noticed that some of the sets from TLM and TLM2 that have Unikitty with alternate
face pieces have her listed as a Counterpart and others do not.
Just wondering if I could get the pending minifigs approved so that these are
all consistent.
Thanks!
COMCON040-1
tlm080: Cheerykitty (Cheery Kitty)
tlm081: Cutesykitty (Cutesy Kitty)
70818 - Double Decker Couch
tlm093: Unikitty - Puzzled, Sitting
tlm097: Unikitty - Unikitty - Eyes Watering, Sitting - Waiting for Approval
COMCON057-1
tlm101: Rage Kitty
tlm102: Angry Kitty
70822 - Unikitty's Sweetest Friends EVER!
tlm126: Unikitty - Lopsided Smile
tlm168: Unikitty - Eyes Closed, Smile with Tongue Out - Waiting for Approval
70831 - Emmet's Dream House/Rescue Rocket!
tlm147: Unikitty - Warrior Kitty, Sleeping
tlm146: Unikitty - Warrior Kitty, Frowning - Waiting for Approva
|
|
|
Author: | TyresOFlaherty | Posted: | Feb 5, 2019 11:34 | Subject: | Questions about Unikitty / Counterparts | Viewed: | 93 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I noticed that some of the sets from TLM and TLM2 that have Unikitty with alternate
face pieces have her listed as a Counterpart and others do not.
Just wondering if I could get the pending minifigs approved so that these are
all consistent.
Thanks!
COMCON040-1
tlm080: Cheerykitty (Cheery Kitty)
tlm081: Cutesykitty (Cutesy Kitty)
70818 - Double Decker Couch
tlm093: Unikitty - Puzzled, Sitting
tlm097: Unikitty - Unikitty - Eyes Watering, Sitting - Waiting for Approval
COMCON057-1
tlm101: Rage Kitty
tlm102: Angry Kitty
70822 - Unikitty's Sweetest Friends EVER!
tlm126: Unikitty - Lopsided Smile
tlm168: Unikitty - Eyes Closed, Smile with Tongue Out - Waiting for Approval
70831 - Emmet's Dream House/Rescue Rocket!
tlm147: Unikitty - Warrior Kitty, Sleeping
tlm146: Unikitty - Warrior Kitty, Frowning - Waiting for Approva
|
|
Author: | FreeStorm | Posted: | Feb 4, 2019 03:53 | Subject: | Re: Missing rules for special parts dimensions | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Bump!
Nobody know how to deal with dimensions?
Fred
In Catalog, FreeStorm writes:
| Hello,
I was looking to define some missing parts dimensions.
With standard bricks, it's easy, but how do we define dimensions when parts
are not standard?
Maybe I miss something, but I didn't find the rules there:
https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=261
For example:
The size is [2 x 4 x 2] or [2 x Y x 2] ?
The size is [2 x 5 x 2] or [2 x 4 x 2] ?
The size is [2 x 6] or [2 x 4] ?
[p=bb73]
The size is [4 x 4] or [Y x Y x Y] ?
PS: I put "Y" in my examples, because I don't have the parts in front of
me.
|
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | Feb 3, 2019 02:43 | Subject: | Re: Standardize name for belt with ammunition | Viewed: | 27 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, kurotakajo writes:
| Some torsos have "ammunition belt" in their description and others "bandolier".
My personal vote is "ammunition belt". It makes it difficult to find a torso
in the catalog when you don't know the character or theme.
For example: "Torso Pharaoh's Quest Tan Waistcoat, White Shirt, Bandolier
and Silver Buckle Pattern (Jake Raines) / Tan Arms / Yellow Hands" (973pb0781c01)
"Torso Monster Fighters with Ammunition Belt Pattern / Dark Tan Arms / Yellow
Hands" (973pb1113c01)
These two items are similar-looking.
|
You can submit any name change you would like using the following form:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogReq.asp?itemType=P
The catalog admins will then decide whether the change will be accepted or not.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
Author: | moreshelfspace | Posted: | Feb 3, 2019 02:33 | Subject: | Standardize name for belt with ammunition | Viewed: | 66 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Some torsos have "ammunition belt" in their description and others "bandolier".
My personal vote is "ammunition belt". It makes it difficult to find a torso
in the catalog when you don't know the character or theme.
For example: "Torso Pharaoh's Quest Tan Waistcoat, White Shirt, Bandolier
and Silver Buckle Pattern (Jake Raines) / Tan Arms / Yellow Hands" (973pb0781c01)
"Torso Monster Fighters with Ammunition Belt Pattern / Dark Tan Arms / Yellow
Hands" (973pb1113c01)
These two items are similar-looking.
|
Author: | InsanePyro | Posted: | Feb 2, 2019 22:47 | Subject: | Re: Why is 4746 categorized as Tail? | Viewed: | 40 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, mfav writes:
I would imagine its consider a tail due to how the "base" of the brick is the
same as "normal" tails
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | Feb 2, 2019 18:42 | Subject: | Re: Difference between sw0993 & sw0530 | Viewed: | 49 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
| In Catalog, jennnifer writes:
| In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:
| Printing on the new body part is vastly improved over the original minifig, that
together with the new pcc justified a new minifig entry in the catalog.
|
I believe that if this were the case, there would be many, many more nearly similar
parts in our catalog.
Sellers have to be able to identify which part they have in hand with no more
then the text and image for reference. There needs to be some detail that isn't
subjective.
Jen
|
Photos side by side of both of them, on left sw0530 from 2014, on right sw0993
from 2019. Differences are very elusive. White lines of printing are thiner,
especially on front emblem and on shoulders.
|
That simply looks like a print fidelity difference. This happens with many parts.
The printing can change as the equipment wears down, the printing can change
as advances are made in printing technology, the printing can change with part
alignment during the printing process, etc.
In other words, looks like the same minifig to me.
Cheers,
Randy
|
|
Author: | Hygrotus | Posted: | Feb 2, 2019 17:47 | Subject: | Re: Difference between sw0993 & sw0530 | Viewed: | 46 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, jennnifer writes:
| In Catalog, grimsbricksuk writes:
| Printing on the new body part is vastly improved over the original minifig, that
together with the new pcc justified a new minifig entry in the catalog.
|
I believe that if this were the case, there would be many, many more nearly similar
parts in our catalog.
Sellers have to be able to identify which part they have in hand with no more
then the text and image for reference. There needs to be some detail that isn't
subjective.
Jen
|
Photos side by side of both of them, on left sw0530 from 2014, on right sw0993
from 2019. Differences are very elusive. White lines of printing are thiner,
especially on front emblem and on shoulders.
|
|
|
Author: | whitesidewjw | Posted: | Feb 2, 2019 08:20 | Subject: | Method for naming prototype parts | Viewed: | 89 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I have several prototype parts in my store. In fact I am thinking that I will
specialize in these types of parts. Is it possible to have a part type called
prototype? These are molded parts made by Lego that were never released in ant
set or any color.
|
Author: | leopard37 | Posted: | Feb 1, 2019 11:14 | Subject: | Re: Why is 4746 categorized as Tail? | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, mfav writes:
Agree,
Takes a long time to find when something like this happens.
Too bad these aren't on a project list of stuff to improve somewhere anymore...
Tyson.
|
Author: | jodawill | Posted: | Feb 1, 2019 10:20 | Subject: | Did the Lego Pirates books come in paperback? | Viewed: | 59 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| When I look up these Lego Pirates books on Amazon, they're mostly listed
as paperbacks. Does anyone know if they were actually ever printed in paperback,
or are those Amazon listings wrong? Bricklink only shows them as being printed
in hardcover.
|
|
Author: | Edwin073 | Posted: | Feb 1, 2019 05:22 | Subject: | Re: Discount on only used parts? | Viewed: | 26 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| In Catalog, Edwin073 writes:
| Hello all,
I have a question. Hope you can help me.
I would like to give all my used parts a 20% discount. How can I only select
my used parts so I can put in the discount? If I use the search option I will
get everything what's used in my inventory included my sets, instructions,
minifigures etc...
I only want my parts on discount. Do I have to do this for every parts individually
now or is there a other way?
Thanks.
Edwin
|
Go here, enter the discount, then under condition select items that are USED.
https://www.bricklink.com/inventory.asp
|
Hello,
Thanks for the reply. This I know but I want to choose all used parts at once
if possible? If I put "used" and "parts" in the search then I get like 20 pages
of 100 parts and I have to check every item individually?
Is this even possible?
Greetings Edwin
|
|
Author: | yorbrick | Posted: | Jan 31, 2019 15:02 | Subject: | Re: Discount on only used parts? | Viewed: | 36 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Edwin073 writes:
| Hello all,
I have a question. Hope you can help me.
I would like to give all my used parts a 20% discount. How can I only select
my used parts so I can put in the discount? If I use the search option I will
get everything what's used in my inventory included my sets, instructions,
minifigures etc...
I only want my parts on discount. Do I have to do this for every parts individually
now or is there a other way?
Thanks.
Edwin
|
Go here, enter the discount, then under condition select items that are USED.
https://www.bricklink.com/inventory.asp
|
|
Author: | yorbrick | Posted: | Jan 31, 2019 15:00 | Subject: | Re: Lego Movie 2 set 71023 Mini Figures | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, MarshMan80 writes:
| Hello again, its Thursday now and I'm just wondering when this will be entered
or available for us to use so me can get or product listed.
|
A day or two. Official release date is tomorrow.
Although they have been out here for a couple of weeks now. My early ones went
on ebay.
|
|
Author: | Edwin073 | Posted: | Jan 31, 2019 14:28 | Subject: | Discount on only used parts? | Viewed: | 65 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello all,
I have a question. Hope you can help me.
I would like to give all my used parts a 20% discount. How can I only select
my used parts so I can put in the discount? If I use the search option I will
get everything what's used in my inventory included my sets, instructions,
minifigures etc...
I only want my parts on discount. Do I have to do this for every parts individually
now or is there a other way?
Thanks.
Edwin
|
Author: | MarshMan80 | Posted: | Jan 31, 2019 14:11 | Subject: | Lego Movie 2 set 71023 Mini Figures | Viewed: | 71 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Hello again, its Thursday now and I'm just wondering when this will be entered
or available for us to use so me can get or product listed.
|
Author: | JulieK | Posted: | Jan 31, 2019 11:49 | Subject: | Name tweaks for 64251 and 93575 | Viewed: | 64 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Please consider tweaking the names for 64251 and 93575 in order to make identifying
them a little easier.
Please add "3 fingers" to
Please add "4 fingers" to
Then maybe rearrange the pictures so that the images showing the fingers shows
up while browsing the catalog.
Thanks!
|
|
Author: | nectara | Posted: | Jan 31, 2019 08:35 | Subject: | Re: The LEGO movie 2 CFM | Viewed: | 24 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, zack_attack writes:
| In Catalog Requests, axaday writes:
| In Catalog Requests, MarshMan80 writes:
| Anyone know when the new LEGO movie 2 CFM figures will be added to the catalogue?
I have some that I’m waiting to upload.
Thanks
|
Thursday. The street date is February 1.
|
They are already available in French Lego store, also in the French catalog the
release date is January (bottom left of the picture).
|
Most of supermarkets have them for sale in the last 2 weeks.
I already sold a few on BO which list them 2 weeks ago but Bricklink...
Regards
Nectara
|
|
Author: | zack_attack | Posted: | Jan 31, 2019 08:27 | Subject: | Re: The LEGO movie 2 CFM | Viewed: | 24 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, axaday writes:
| In Catalog Requests, MarshMan80 writes:
| Anyone know when the new LEGO movie 2 CFM figures will be added to the catalogue?
I have some that I’m waiting to upload.
Thanks
|
Thursday. The street date is February 1.
|
They are already available in French Lego store, also in the French catalog the
release date is January (bottom left of the picture).
|
|
Author: | runner.caller | Posted: | Jan 30, 2019 14:41 | Subject: | Special Assembly for Hulk Buster | Viewed: | 99 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Can anyone add special Assemblies?
I'd like one added to sell the Hulkbuster suit (76104) vs breaking it down
for parts, but the one I acquired was in a used lot so I don't know for sure
if it's complete.
I guess I could find online instructions and enter in everything for him that
way.
|
|
Author: | axaday | Posted: | Jan 29, 2019 22:58 | Subject: | Re: The LEGO movie 2 CFM | Viewed: | 41 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, MarshMan80 writes:
| Anyone know when the new LEGO movie 2 CFM figures will be added to the catalogue?
I have some that I’m waiting to upload.
Thanks
|
Please someone pay attention while opening them and post here. I noticed when
opening my case that several of them had inner polybags and I couldn't make
any sense of it at the time. In at least one case the entire minifig was inside
the inner bag, but others it wasn't. I couldn't see a pattern. But
while taking pics to inventory them I noticed that some torsos have their arms
on flat instead of slightly forward and at least one of them I know was one of
the ones in the polybag. Could it be that a Chinese factory makes those inner
polybags and the rest is being assembled elsewhere?
|
|
Author: | jeffersonalan | Posted: | Jan 29, 2019 21:32 | Subject: | Re: The LEGO movie 2 CFM | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, technoluddite writes:
| I'm in Canada too. Where did you find them released early?
My local T.R.U. NEVER seems to put anything out ahead of the street date.
Chris
HammertownBricks
|
Walmart put them out today, well at least at my local walmart!!
|
|
Author: | TyresOFlaherty | Posted: | Jan 29, 2019 15:41 | Subject: | Re: Minifig Inventory for 70831? | Viewed: | 42 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| (I thought I'd replied to this message, but it didn't seem to go through?
Either way, here goes).
Thanks! Glad the images are working I can update that Unikitty pic when I
get home tonight.
As far as the Unikitty figs, I figured we'd have the sleeping one as the
main fig (since it's the one in the main instructions) and the other one
as the counterpart (that's what we did when I inventoried the Apocalypseburg
Unikitty set)
And as far as Rex goes, I wasn't sure whether or not to do his backpack as
part of the fig, but figured I should include the backpack (thinking back
to Mos Eisley stormtroopers in sets I have that have brick built backpacks) but
I shouldn't include the trans-light blue pieces (because Sweet Mayhem
has similar boosts, but aren't part of the main minifig).
Either way works, just let me know, because I'd obviously have to tweak the
inventory to put his backpack pieces back in there.
Thanks!
In Catalog, Admin_Russell writes:
| In Catalog Requests, TyresOFlaherty writes:
| I've been uploading new parts for 70831 the past couple days, and I'm
just about ready to do a full inventory on the set, I'm just waiting for
3 minifigs that I've tried to add to be approved: tlm145, tlm146, tlm147.
I know that they're in line numerically behind other figs that will be approved
once the Apocalypseburg (7084) is approved, can I get an admin to approve them
so I can inventory them and get them added to 70831?
Thanks!
|
They are being held up because of issues concerning the exact build. The rocket
guy has blasts coming out of the rockets. However, we need to decide whether
or not to include the whole blaster backpack assembly or not. Sometimes those
decisions take a while.
The unikitties have similar problems. First, I don't know if we will approve
two different constructions of a minifigure for a single set. This has been done
before, but only on a case-by-case basis.
The sleeping one will get approved for sure since it comes from the primary build.
However, you need to reshoot that one with the head attached as shown in the
instructions. The current pending image shows the head 1/2 stud offset to the
right. It shouldn't cover the Reddish Brown 1 x 1 at all.
I realize the photos on the box and instructions show the sleeping kitty built
the way you have it in your photo, but we try to stick close to the instructions
whenever possible.
Thanks for you contributions so far, especially the images.
Go ahead and move the inventory to pending status using autofill before it drops
off the reservation list. You can add the figs to the pending inventory and the
Inv Admins will address any problems they see.
|
|
|
Author: | elias3 | Posted: | Jan 29, 2019 14:38 | Subject: | Re: A Smidgen of Lego History | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
| In Catalog, elias3 writes:
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
right, Duplo is 5y older as 'moi'
|
Happy Birthday, Stefaan!
Hope you have a great day filled with at least one new LEGO set!
Cheers,
Randy
|
thanks!! No new set at this moment, only Belgian chocolate bon-bons
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | Jan 29, 2019 14:29 | Subject: | Re: A Smidgen of Lego History | Viewed: | 18 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, elias3 writes:
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
right, Duplo is 5y older as 'moi'
|
Happy Birthday, Stefaan!
Hope you have a great day filled with at least one new LEGO set!
Cheers,
Randy
|
Author: | elias3 | Posted: | Jan 29, 2019 13:09 | Subject: | Re: A Smidgen of Lego History | Viewed: | 29 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| In Catalog, WoutR writes:
| […]
| right, Duplo is 5y older as 'moi'
|
I guess that means: Happy birthday elias3!
|
Indeed, Happy Birthday!
|
thanks!!
|
| I see that I had Duplo's first push train
|
Well, the first train that looked like a train and had tracks to roll on.
There were Duplo connecting cars before 1980. Even without tracks, connected
cars very much spell train to a 2-year-old
|
|
Author: | elias3 | Posted: | Jan 29, 2019 13:08 | Subject: | Re: A Smidgen of Lego History | Viewed: | 21 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, WoutR writes:
| In Catalog, elias3 writes:
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
right, Duplo is 5y older as 'moi'
|
I guess that means: Happy birthday elias3!
|
thanks!!
|
I see that I had Duplo's first push train
|
|
|
Author: | Admin_Russell | Posted: | Jan 29, 2019 12:28 | Subject: | Re: Minifig Inventory for 70831? | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, TyresOFlaherty writes:
| I've been uploading new parts for 70831 the past couple days, and I'm
just about ready to do a full inventory on the set, I'm just waiting for
3 minifigs that I've tried to add to be approved: tlm145, tlm146, tlm147.
I know that they're in line numerically behind other figs that will be approved
once the Apocalypseburg (7084) is approved, can I get an admin to approve them
so I can inventory them and get them added to 70831?
Thanks!
|
They are being held up because of issues concerning the exact build. The rocket
guy has blasts coming out of the rockets. However, we need to decide whether
or not to include the whole blaster backpack assembly or not. Sometimes those
decisions take a while.
The unikitties have similar problems. First, I don't know if we will approve
two different constructions of a minifigure for a single set. This has been done
before, but only on a case-by-case basis.
The sleeping one will get approved for sure since it comes from the primary build.
However, you need to reshoot that one with the head attached as shown in the
instructions. The current pending image shows the head 1/2 stud offset to the
right. It shouldn't cover the Reddish Brown 1 x 1 at all.
I realize the photos on the box and instructions show the sleeping kitty built
the way you have it in your photo, but we try to stick close to the instructions
whenever possible.
Thanks for you contributions so far, especially the images.
Go ahead and move the inventory to pending status using autofill before it drops
off the reservation list. You can add the figs to the pending inventory and the
Inv Admins will address any problems they see.
|
|
Author: | technoluddite | Posted: | Jan 29, 2019 12:17 | Subject: | Re: The LEGO movie 2 CFM | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| I'm in Canada too. Where did you find them released early?
My local T.R.U. NEVER seems to put anything out ahead of the street date.
Chris
HammertownBricks
|
Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | Jan 29, 2019 12:06 | Subject: | Re: A Smidgen of Lego History | Viewed: | 27 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, WoutR writes:
| […]
| right, Duplo is 5y older as 'moi'
|
I guess that means: Happy birthday elias3!
|
Indeed, Happy Birthday!
| I see that I had Duplo's first push train
|
Well, the first train that looked like a train and had tracks to roll on.
There were Duplo connecting cars before 1980. Even without tracks, connected
cars very much spell train to a 2-year-old
|
Author: | WoutR | Posted: | Jan 29, 2019 11:58 | Subject: | Re: A Smidgen of Lego History | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, elias3 writes:
| In Catalog, Hygrotus writes:
right, Duplo is 5y older as 'moi'
|
I guess that means: Happy birthday elias3!
I see that I had Duplo's first push train
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|