Discussion Forum: Thread 354219 |
|
|
| | Author: | DeLuca | Posted: | Feb 21, 2024 22:23 | Subject: | Fat Shaming the Chonky Alien? | Viewed: | 134 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
|
| Why is the round Friends alien in set 42605 not considered a Minifig, while their
slimmer sibling from the City sets (cty1727) is? The instructions do not have
this figure as part of a larger assembly, so there is no reason for this
egregious double-standard!
Please remove parts 3262pb05 (Lime, 1x) and 15469 (Lime, 1x) from the main inventory
of set 42605, and add the alien Minifig entry that I created. I will have a pic
of the Minifig up later.
[P=3262pb05]
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | TakeAbricK | Posted: | Feb 22, 2024 00:10 | Subject: | Re: Fat Shaming the Chonky Alien? | Viewed: | 62 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| Why is the round Friends alien in set 42605 not considered a Minifig, while their
slimmer sibling from the City sets (cty1727) is? The instructions do not have
this figure as part of a larger assembly, so there is no reason for this
egregious double-standard!
|
The reason I didn't add it as a Minifigure in the Friends set is that LEGO
doesn't consider it a Minifigure / character.
The reason I approved it for the City set as a minifigure, is that LEGO does.
I didn't see this as an egregious double-standard, nor a Fat Shaming, but
I will discuss it with the other admins.
Thanks,
Diana
|
Please remove parts 3262pb05 (Lime, 1x) and 15469 (Lime, 1x) from the main inventory
of set 42605, and add the alien Minifig entry that I created. I will have a pic
of the Minifig up later.
[P=3262pb05]
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | TakeAbricK | Posted: | Feb 22, 2024 12:48 | Subject: | Re: Fat Shaming the Chonky Alien? | Viewed: | 51 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, TakeAbricK writes:
| In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| Why is the round Friends alien in set 42605 not considered a Minifig, while their
slimmer sibling from the City sets (cty1727) is? The instructions do not have
this figure as part of a larger assembly, so there is no reason for this
egregious double-standard!
|
The reason I didn't add it as a Minifigure in the Friends set is that LEGO
doesn't consider it a Minifigure / character.
The reason I approved it for the City set as a minifigure, is that LEGO does.
I didn't see this as an egregious double-standard, nor a Fat Shaming, but
I will discuss it with the other admins.
Thanks,
Diana
|
It turns out that the same Alien comes in a City set and for this set LEGO does
see it as a character. So you can go ahead and submit it as a City Minifigure.
Thanks,
Diana
|
|
Please remove parts 3262pb05 (Lime, 1x) and 15469 (Lime, 1x) from the main inventory
of set 42605, and add the alien Minifig entry that I created. I will have a pic
of the Minifig up later.
[P=3262pb05]
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | DeLuca | Posted: | Feb 22, 2024 13:26 | Subject: | Re: Fat Shaming the Chonky Alien? | Viewed: | 44 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, TakeAbricK writes:
| I didn't see this as an egregious double-standard, nor a Fat Shaming
|
I thought that it was obvious, but that part was a joke!
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | Stellar | Posted: | Feb 22, 2024 04:20 | Subject: | Re: Fat Shaming the Chonky Alien? | Viewed: | 53 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, DeLuca writes:
| Why is the round Friends alien in set 42605 not considered a Minifig, while their
slimmer sibling from the City sets (cty1727) is? The instructions do not have
this figure as part of a larger assembly, so there is no reason for this
egregious double-standard!
Please remove parts 3262pb05 (Lime, 1x) and 15469 (Lime, 1x) from the main inventory
of set 42605, and add the alien Minifig entry that I created. I will have a pic
of the Minifig up later.
[P=3262pb05]
|
Themes meeting the same things in the Lego Sets Universe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|