| Discussion Forum: Thread 353547 |
|
 |
| | | Author: | pcthurman  | | Posted: | Feb 4, 2024 22:34 | | Subject: | Why is Mack not considered a minifigure? | | Viewed: | 163 times | | Topic: | Inventories | | Status: | Open | |
|
| In set Why is Mack not considered a minifigure? I do not see a difference
between Mack or Lightning other than size and well yes Mack has a trailer but
in the movies he is a character. So why the difference?
Cass T
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Feb 4, 2024 22:58 | | Subject: | Re: Why is Mack not considered a minifigure? | | Viewed: | 63 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
|
| In Inventories, pcthurman writes:
| | In set Why is Mack not considered a minifigure? I do not see a difference
between Mack or Lightning other than size and well yes Mack has a trailer but
in the movies he is a character. So why the difference?
Cass T
|
Nobody added him. 
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2024 10:08 | | Subject: | Re: Why is Mack not considered a minifigure? | | Viewed: | 61 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
|
| In Inventories, pcthurman writes:
| | In set Why is Mack not considered a minifigure? I do not see a difference
between Mack or Lightning other than size and well yes Mack has a trailer but
in the movies he is a character. So why the difference?
Cass T
|
Is Mack just the Tractor or the Tractor and the Trailer?
I'm going to say the former. That makes the Trailer an accessory that shouldn't
be included?? 
~Jen
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2024 12:03 | | Subject: | Re: Why is Mack not considered a minifigure? | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
|
| In Inventories, jennnifer writes:
| | In Inventories, pcthurman writes:
| | In set Why is Mack not considered a minifigure? I do not see a difference
between Mack or Lightning other than size and well yes Mack has a trailer but
in the movies he is a character. So why the difference?
Cass T
|
Is Mack just the Tractor or the Tractor and the Trailer?
I'm going to say the former. That makes the Trailer an accessory that shouldn't
be included??
~Jen
|
Isn't it like clothing, or an accessory attached to his back like in
I guess this is the issue of having obviously not minifigures in the minifigures
category. Small animal characters like Scooby Doo or big ones like Smaug go in
animals, so it seems odd to put vehicle based characters in minifigs and not
in the existing vehicle category. If this is going ahead, presumably Ent / Treebeard
spa0019 can also be moved into minifigures too.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Author: | starbeanie | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2024 12:17 | | Subject: | Re: Why is Mack not considered a minifigure? | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
|
| Mack is certainly eligible to be a minifig. Afterall, we have
In Inventories, yorbrick writes:
| | In Inventories, jennnifer writes:
| | In Inventories, pcthurman writes:
| | In set Why is Mack not considered a minifigure? I do not see a difference
between Mack or Lightning other than size and well yes Mack has a trailer but
in the movies he is a character. So why the difference?
Cass T
|
Is Mack just the Tractor or the Tractor and the Trailer?
I'm going to say the former. That makes the Trailer an accessory that shouldn't
be included??
~Jen
|
Isn't it like clothing, or an accessory attached to his back like in
I guess this is the issue of having obviously not minifigures in the minifigures
category. Small animal characters like Scooby Doo or big ones like Smaug go in
animals, so it seems odd to put vehicle based characters in minifigs and not
in the existing vehicle category. If this is going ahead, presumably Ent / Treebeard
spa0019 can also be moved into minifigures too.
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2024 12:24 | | Subject: | Re: Why is Mack not considered a minifigure? | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
|
| In Inventories, starbeanie writes:
| | Mack is certainly eligible to be a minifig. Afterall, we have
|
Presumably both a minifigure with stickers and a vehicle without them, like that
plane.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | pcthurman | | Posted: | Feb 5, 2024 17:03 | | Subject: | Re: Why is Mack not considered a minifigure? | | Viewed: | 50 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
|
| In Inventories, jennnifer writes:
| | In Inventories, pcthurman writes:
| | In set Why is Mack not considered a minifigure? I do not see a difference
between Mack or Lightning other than size and well yes Mack has a trailer but
in the movies he is a character. So why the difference?
Cass T
|
Is Mack just the Tractor or the Tractor and the Trailer?
I'm going to say the former. That makes the Trailer an accessory that shouldn't
be included??
~Jen
|
I believe just the cab is the minifigure Mack. Yes, the trailer is a "wearable"
accessory however I would not include the trailer as such.
Cass T
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA, Virginia
United Kingdom, England
