Discussion Forum: Thread 348405 |
|
|
| | Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | Oct 13, 2023 11:35 | Subject: | Split 3039pb041? | Viewed: | 102 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hi,
and
are actually two different patterns: the black one doesn’t have painted black
outlines.
Should they be split? Or should a note be added? Or does no one care?
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | hpoort | Posted: | Oct 13, 2023 11:51 | Subject: | Re: Split 3039pb041? | Viewed: | 29 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| Hi,
and
are actually two different patterns: the black one doesn’t have painted black
outlines.
Should they be split? Or should a note be added? Or does no one care?
|
I believe there is a precedent that was not split, but did have a note. If only
I would remember which part it was.
I believe no-one cares.
It would matter for LDraw, but this print is not (yet) on there (or is it?)
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | Nicolasamico37 | Posted: | Oct 13, 2023 11:55 | Subject: | Re: Split 3039pb041? | Viewed: | 32 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, hpoort writes:
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| Hi,
and
are actually two different patterns: the black one doesn’t have painted black
outlines.
Should they be split? Or should a note be added? Or does no one care?
|
I believe there is a precedent that was not split, but did have a note. If only
I would remember which part it was.
I believe no-one cares.
It would matter for LDraw, but this print is not (yet) on there (or is it?)
|
For exemple, parts
and
have "similar" pattern here.
The first has White squares on Black background, the second has Black squares
on Yellow background.
Nicolas
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | Oct 13, 2023 11:55 | Subject: | Re: Split 3039pb041? | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, hpoort writes:
| […]
I believe there is a precedent that was not split, but did have a note. If only
I would remember which part it was.
I believe no-one cares.
|
Yeah, and it would cause a lot of wrong lots in stores I guess.
| It would matter for LDraw, but this print is not (yet) on there (or is it?)
|
Actually, both versions are in LDraw (and had been for a long time) and my question
stems from this post on the Studio forum https://forum.bricklink.com/viewtopic.php?t=9664
because Studio uses the “wrong” one
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | randyf | Posted: | Oct 13, 2023 16:56 | Subject: | Re: Split 3039pb041? | Viewed: | 53 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, SylvainLS writes:
| Hi,
and
are actually two different patterns: the black one doesn’t have painted black
outlines.
Should they be split?
|
Technically speaking, yes.
| Or should a note be added?
|
This would be the easiest. I have a long list of items like this in the catalog
that should be officially split but haven't been due to time constraints.
| Or does no one care?
|
That is the consensus, so things like this are extremely low priority.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | SylvainLS | Posted: | Oct 13, 2023 17:11 | Subject: | Re: Split 3039pb041? | Viewed: | 45 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, randyf writes:
Thanks for this complete and professional answer
|
|
|
|
|
|