|
 |
| | | Author: | brickerking  | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 00:26 | | Subject: | Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 186 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
|
| | | | Additional notes:
This character is not Yoda, but instead a juvenile member of the same species as Yoda. The term 'Baby Yoda' is a
popular term among fans and the media. It was added to the item's title merely to facilitate searches.
|
|
Wait, isn't that the whole point of product descriptions in item names?
Should we not put on a note on every item in which terms are used to facilitate
searches then? LOL
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 02:26 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 47 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| |
| | | | Additional notes:
This character is not Yoda, but instead a juvenile member of the same species as Yoda. The term 'Baby Yoda' is a
popular term among fans and the media. It was added to the item's title merely to facilitate searches.
|
|
Wait, isn't that the whole point of product descriptions in item names?
Should we not put on a note on every item in which terms are used to facilitate
searches then? LOL
|
The point is this is not Yoda, yet an early, popular name for the character was
added to the official name to aid searches even though this is now known to be
incorrect. Hence a note to stop people complaining that this is not Yoda.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 02:32 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, yorbrick writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| |
| | | | Additional notes:
This character is not Yoda, but instead a juvenile member of the same species as Yoda. The term 'Baby Yoda' is a
popular term among fans and the media. It was added to the item's title merely to facilitate searches.
|
|
Wait, isn't that the whole point of product descriptions in item names?
Should we not put on a note on every item in which terms are used to facilitate
searches then? LOL
|
The point is this is not Yoda, yet an early, popular name for the character was
added to the official name to aid searches even though this is now known to be
incorrect. Hence a note to stop people complaining that this is not Yoda.
|
+1 it makes a lot of sense. It’s like a second name for him and the note is there
for people who haven’t heard of it before so they don’t submit change requests
or get confused
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 14:59 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 50 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, yorbrick writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| |
| | | | Additional notes:
This character is not Yoda, but instead a juvenile member of the same species as Yoda. The term 'Baby Yoda' is a
popular term among fans and the media. It was added to the item's title merely to facilitate searches.
|
|
Wait, isn't that the whole point of product descriptions in item names?
Should we not put on a note on every item in which terms are used to facilitate
searches then? LOL
|
The point is this is not Yoda, yet an early, popular name for the character was
added to the official name to aid searches even though this is now known to be
incorrect. Hence a note to stop people complaining that this is not Yoda.
|
Perfect explanation. Thanks!
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 09:43 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 74 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| |
| | | | Additional notes:
This character is not Yoda, but instead a juvenile member of the same species as Yoda. The term 'Baby Yoda' is a
popular term among fans and the media. It was added to the item's title merely to facilitate searches.
|
|
Wait, isn't that the whole point of product descriptions in item names?
Should we not put on a note on every item in which terms are used to facilitate
searches then? LOL
|
I think the name is a great example of our catalog being responsive to everyday
users who need the search term. I think the note is there to forestall corrections
from those who may feel that the catalog should be precise to the exclusion of
all else. Why is it needed? Maybe because the SW minifig community is particularly
particular. 
~Jen
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | brickerking | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 12:31 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 73 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| I guess what makes me laugh is that it's a combative statement, like we are
expecting people to complain.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 15:14 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | I guess what makes me laugh is that it's a combative statement, like we are
expecting people to complain.
|
I am guessing that you have never interacted with the Star Wars fans that roam
these halls, have you? 
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Author: | DeLuca | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2023 09:16 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, randyf writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | I guess what makes me laugh is that it's a combative statement, like we are
expecting people to complain.
|
I am guessing that you have never interacted with the Star Wars fans that roam
these halls, have you?
|
😈
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2023 10:51 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, DeLuca writes:
| | In Off Topic, randyf writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | I guess what makes me laugh is that it's a combative statement, like we are
expecting people to complain.
|
I am guessing that you have never interacted with the Star Wars fans that roam
these halls, have you?
|
😈
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 15:17 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 49 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | I guess what makes me laugh is that it's a combative statement, like we are
expecting people to complain.
|
And it is not a combative statement. It is merely a statement of fact placed
there so that we do not get inundated with requests to remove the term from the
title.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Author: | brickerking | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 17:14 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, randyf writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | I guess what makes me laugh is that it's a combative statement, like we are
expecting people to complain.
|
And it is not a combative statement. It is merely a statement of fact placed
there so that we do not get inundated with requests to remove the term from the
title.
|
OK, passive aggressive then.
If it wasn't, then we would have "additional notes" for this minifig,
right?
* | | 4j003a Construction Worker with Blue Shirt, Green Vest and Cap with the Word 'Brick', Sunglasses and Moustache
Minifigures: 4 Juniors |
Additional Notes: This is a non-descript juniors minifigure. We have added 'Brick'
to assist in search results.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 17:16 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, randyf writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | I guess what makes me laugh is that it's a combative statement, like we are
expecting people to complain.
|
And it is not a combative statement. It is merely a statement of fact placed
there so that we do not get inundated with requests to remove the term from the
title.
|
OK, passive aggressive then.
If it wasn't, then we would have "additional notes" for this minifig,
right?
* | | 4j003a Construction Worker with Blue Shirt, Green Vest and Cap with the Word 'Brick', Sunglasses and Moustache
Minifigures: 4 Juniors |
Additional Notes: This is a non-descript juniors minifigure. We have added 'Brick'
to assist in search results.
|
but brick is printed on the figure and isn't a "nickname" for that
figure that is widely used that would confuse people
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | brickerking | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 17:25 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, randyf writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | I guess what makes me laugh is that it's a combative statement, like we are
expecting people to complain.
|
And it is not a combative statement. It is merely a statement of fact placed
there so that we do not get inundated with requests to remove the term from the
title.
|
OK, passive aggressive then.
If it wasn't, then we would have "additional notes" for this minifig,
right?
* | | 4j003a Construction Worker with Blue Shirt, Green Vest and Cap with the Word 'Brick', Sunglasses and Moustache
Minifigures: 4 Juniors |
Additional Notes: This is a non-descript juniors minifigure. We have added 'Brick'
to assist in search results.
|
but brick is printed on the figure and isn't a "nickname" for that
figure that is widely used that would confuse people
|
Sorry, that was just one of the first minifigs in the catalog. How about:
I could literally point to hundreds or thousands of examples.
It's just that the statement is stating the obvious just to be obvious. Like,
i'm going to put a period at the end of this sentence so you know it's
finished. Or, if the additional notes said, " We put the item number here
so you could search for it".
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 17:27 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, randyf writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | I guess what makes me laugh is that it's a combative statement, like we are
expecting people to complain.
|
And it is not a combative statement. It is merely a statement of fact placed
there so that we do not get inundated with requests to remove the term from the
title.
|
OK, passive aggressive then.
If it wasn't, then we would have "additional notes" for this minifig,
right?
* | | 4j003a Construction Worker with Blue Shirt, Green Vest and Cap with the Word 'Brick', Sunglasses and Moustache
Minifigures: 4 Juniors |
Additional Notes: This is a non-descript juniors minifigure. We have added 'Brick'
to assist in search results.
|
but brick is printed on the figure and isn't a "nickname" for that
figure that is widely used that would confuse people
|
Sorry, that was just one of the first minifigs in the catalog. How about:
I could literally point to hundreds or thousands of examples.
|
but isn't sharon charter agent 13? (I've never watched the show/movie)
meanwhile gorgu isn't baby yoda but just referred to as baby yoda
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | brickerking | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 17:35 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, randyf writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | I guess what makes me laugh is that it's a combative statement, like we are
expecting people to complain.
|
And it is not a combative statement. It is merely a statement of fact placed
there so that we do not get inundated with requests to remove the term from the
title.
|
OK, passive aggressive then.
If it wasn't, then we would have "additional notes" for this minifig,
right?
* | | 4j003a Construction Worker with Blue Shirt, Green Vest and Cap with the Word 'Brick', Sunglasses and Moustache
Minifigures: 4 Juniors |
Additional Notes: This is a non-descript juniors minifigure. We have added 'Brick'
to assist in search results.
|
but brick is printed on the figure and isn't a "nickname" for that
figure that is widely used that would confuse people
|
Sorry, that was just one of the first minifigs in the catalog. How about:
I could literally point to hundreds or thousands of examples.
|
but isn't sharon charter agent 13? (I've never watched the show/movie)
meanwhile gorgu isn't baby yoda but just referred to as baby yoda
|
Also, baby yoda is grogu who is also "the child". The minifigure name
is Din Grogu / The Child / 'Baby Yoda' which are all names of the character.
The first part of the "additional notes" explains baby yoda - the last
part is just passive aggressive and makes me chuckle.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 17:41 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, randyf writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | I guess what makes me laugh is that it's a combative statement, like we are
expecting people to complain.
|
And it is not a combative statement. It is merely a statement of fact placed
there so that we do not get inundated with requests to remove the term from the
title.
|
OK, passive aggressive then.
If it wasn't, then we would have "additional notes" for this minifig,
right?
* | | 4j003a Construction Worker with Blue Shirt, Green Vest and Cap with the Word 'Brick', Sunglasses and Moustache
Minifigures: 4 Juniors |
Additional Notes: This is a non-descript juniors minifigure. We have added 'Brick'
to assist in search results.
|
but brick is printed on the figure and isn't a "nickname" for that
figure that is widely used that would confuse people
|
Sorry, that was just one of the first minifigs in the catalog. How about:
I could literally point to hundreds or thousands of examples.
|
but isn't sharon charter agent 13? (I've never watched the show/movie)
meanwhile gorgu isn't baby yoda but just referred to as baby yoda
|
Also, baby yoda is grogu who is also "the child". The minifigure name
is Din Grogu / The Child / 'Baby Yoda' which are all names of the character.
The first part of the "additional notes" explains baby yoda - the last
part is just passive aggressive and makes me chuckle.
|
but baby yoda isn't his name its a fan name that is very popular. for
example if this one
had 'Thor' (first super heroes name that cam to mind) in the title for
if its just what everyone referred to her as then it would make sense to have
a note in the description to explain why the name "Thor" is in the title
when it not the name of Agent 13
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | brickerking | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 17:48 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, randyf writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | I guess what makes me laugh is that it's a combative statement, like we are
expecting people to complain.
|
And it is not a combative statement. It is merely a statement of fact placed
there so that we do not get inundated with requests to remove the term from the
title.
|
OK, passive aggressive then.
If it wasn't, then we would have "additional notes" for this minifig,
right?
* | | 4j003a Construction Worker with Blue Shirt, Green Vest and Cap with the Word 'Brick', Sunglasses and Moustache
Minifigures: 4 Juniors |
Additional Notes: This is a non-descript juniors minifigure. We have added 'Brick'
to assist in search results.
|
but brick is printed on the figure and isn't a "nickname" for that
figure that is widely used that would confuse people
|
Sorry, that was just one of the first minifigs in the catalog. How about:
I could literally point to hundreds or thousands of examples.
|
but isn't sharon charter agent 13? (I've never watched the show/movie)
meanwhile gorgu isn't baby yoda but just referred to as baby yoda
|
Also, baby yoda is grogu who is also "the child". The minifigure name
is Din Grogu / The Child / 'Baby Yoda' which are all names of the character.
The first part of the "additional notes" explains baby yoda - the last
part is just passive aggressive and makes me chuckle.
|
but baby yoda isn't his name its a fan name that is very popular. for
example if this one
had 'Thor' (first super heroes name that cam to mind) in the title for
if its just what everyone referred to her as then it would make sense to have
a note in the description to explain why the name "Thor" is in the title
when it not the name of Agent 13
|
Yep, totally agree. However, the part that's funny (it's not really that
funny anymore since having to explain it over and over) is to say "Baby Yoda...
was added to the item's title merely to facilitate searches". OF COURSE
IT WAS - WHAT OTHER PURPOSE WOULD THERE BE?
Everything included in an item's title is there to facilitate searches, otherwise,
no one would find anything (unless they added tags, just saying)
I suppose they could have added it there because they thought the arrangement
of the letters looked pleasing to the eye... but I doubt it.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 17:54 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, randyf writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | I guess what makes me laugh is that it's a combative statement, like we are
expecting people to complain.
|
And it is not a combative statement. It is merely a statement of fact placed
there so that we do not get inundated with requests to remove the term from the
title.
|
OK, passive aggressive then.
If it wasn't, then we would have "additional notes" for this minifig,
right?
* | | 4j003a Construction Worker with Blue Shirt, Green Vest and Cap with the Word 'Brick', Sunglasses and Moustache
Minifigures: 4 Juniors |
Additional Notes: This is a non-descript juniors minifigure. We have added 'Brick'
to assist in search results.
|
but brick is printed on the figure and isn't a "nickname" for that
figure that is widely used that would confuse people
|
Sorry, that was just one of the first minifigs in the catalog. How about:
I could literally point to hundreds or thousands of examples.
|
but isn't sharon charter agent 13? (I've never watched the show/movie)
meanwhile gorgu isn't baby yoda but just referred to as baby yoda
|
Also, baby yoda is grogu who is also "the child". The minifigure name
is Din Grogu / The Child / 'Baby Yoda' which are all names of the character.
The first part of the "additional notes" explains baby yoda - the last
part is just passive aggressive and makes me chuckle.
|
but baby yoda isn't his name its a fan name that is very popular. for
example if this one
had 'Thor' (first super heroes name that cam to mind) in the title for
if its just what everyone referred to her as then it would make sense to have
a note in the description to explain why the name "Thor" is in the title
when it not the name of Agent 13
|
Yep, totally agree. However, the part that's funny (it's not really that
funny anymore since having to explain it over and over) is to say "Baby Yoda...
was added to the item's title merely to facilitate searches". OF COURSE
IT WAS - WHAT OTHER PURPOSE WOULD THERE BE?
Everything included in an item's title is there to facilitate searches, otherwise,
no one would find anything (unless they added tags, just saying)
I suppose they could have added it there because they thought the arrangement
of the letters looked pleasing to the eye... but I doubt it.
|
but were you talking about how its weird it has a description to explain it?
But yes it is nice that baby yoda is in the name as its kinda like an "honourable
mention" since so many still like to use that name
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | brickerking | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 17:59 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, randyf writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | I guess what makes me laugh is that it's a combative statement, like we are
expecting people to complain.
|
And it is not a combative statement. It is merely a statement of fact placed
there so that we do not get inundated with requests to remove the term from the
title.
|
OK, passive aggressive then.
If it wasn't, then we would have "additional notes" for this minifig,
right?
* | | 4j003a Construction Worker with Blue Shirt, Green Vest and Cap with the Word 'Brick', Sunglasses and Moustache
Minifigures: 4 Juniors |
Additional Notes: This is a non-descript juniors minifigure. We have added 'Brick'
to assist in search results.
|
but brick is printed on the figure and isn't a "nickname" for that
figure that is widely used that would confuse people
|
Sorry, that was just one of the first minifigs in the catalog. How about:
I could literally point to hundreds or thousands of examples.
|
but isn't sharon charter agent 13? (I've never watched the show/movie)
meanwhile gorgu isn't baby yoda but just referred to as baby yoda
|
Also, baby yoda is grogu who is also "the child". The minifigure name
is Din Grogu / The Child / 'Baby Yoda' which are all names of the character.
The first part of the "additional notes" explains baby yoda - the last
part is just passive aggressive and makes me chuckle.
|
but baby yoda isn't his name its a fan name that is very popular. for
example if this one
had 'Thor' (first super heroes name that cam to mind) in the title for
if its just what everyone referred to her as then it would make sense to have
a note in the description to explain why the name "Thor" is in the title
when it not the name of Agent 13
|
Yep, totally agree. However, the part that's funny (it's not really that
funny anymore since having to explain it over and over) is to say "Baby Yoda...
was added to the item's title merely to facilitate searches". OF COURSE
IT WAS - WHAT OTHER PURPOSE WOULD THERE BE?
Everything included in an item's title is there to facilitate searches, otherwise,
no one would find anything (unless they added tags, just saying)
I suppose they could have added it there because they thought the arrangement
of the letters looked pleasing to the eye... but I doubt it.
|
but were you talking about how its weird it has a description to explain it?
But yes it is nice that baby yoda is in the name as its kinda like an "honourable
mention" since so many still like to use that name
|
Nope, never mentioned that. It's funny how everyone jumped to that conclusion
though. Check out the original post.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 18:03 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, randyf writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | I guess what makes me laugh is that it's a combative statement, like we are
expecting people to complain.
|
And it is not a combative statement. It is merely a statement of fact placed
there so that we do not get inundated with requests to remove the term from the
title.
|
OK, passive aggressive then.
If it wasn't, then we would have "additional notes" for this minifig,
right?
* | | 4j003a Construction Worker with Blue Shirt, Green Vest and Cap with the Word 'Brick', Sunglasses and Moustache
Minifigures: 4 Juniors |
Additional Notes: This is a non-descript juniors minifigure. We have added 'Brick'
to assist in search results.
|
but brick is printed on the figure and isn't a "nickname" for that
figure that is widely used that would confuse people
|
Sorry, that was just one of the first minifigs in the catalog. How about:
I could literally point to hundreds or thousands of examples.
|
but isn't sharon charter agent 13? (I've never watched the show/movie)
meanwhile gorgu isn't baby yoda but just referred to as baby yoda
|
Also, baby yoda is grogu who is also "the child". The minifigure name
is Din Grogu / The Child / 'Baby Yoda' which are all names of the character.
The first part of the "additional notes" explains baby yoda - the last
part is just passive aggressive and makes me chuckle.
|
but baby yoda isn't his name its a fan name that is very popular. for
example if this one
had 'Thor' (first super heroes name that cam to mind) in the title for
if its just what everyone referred to her as then it would make sense to have
a note in the description to explain why the name "Thor" is in the title
when it not the name of Agent 13
|
Yep, totally agree. However, the part that's funny (it's not really that
funny anymore since having to explain it over and over) is to say "Baby Yoda...
was added to the item's title merely to facilitate searches". OF COURSE
IT WAS - WHAT OTHER PURPOSE WOULD THERE BE?
Everything included in an item's title is there to facilitate searches, otherwise,
no one would find anything (unless they added tags, just saying)
I suppose they could have added it there because they thought the arrangement
of the letters looked pleasing to the eye... but I doubt it.
|
but were you talking about how its weird it has a description to explain it?
But yes it is nice that baby yoda is in the name as its kinda like an "honourable
mention" since so many still like to use that name
|
Nope, never mentioned that. It's funny how everyone jumped to that conclusion
though. Check out the original post.
|
I mean the title literally says "Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory?" which
leads me to believe you are talking about how the note for baby yoda is self-explanatory
and then said "Should we not put on a note on every item in which terms are
used to facilitate
searches then? LOL" which once again let me to believe you were talking about
it being weird that it has a note
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 18:10 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| but after reading it a few more times it may more so makes it seem like you were
referring to only the last part of the note not the fact that the note itself
was there but reading it a few times it could be understood either way
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 17:59 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| | | Yep, totally agree. However, the part that's funny (it's not really that
funny anymore since having to explain it over and over) is to say "Baby Yoda...
was added to the item's title merely to facilitate searches". OF COURSE
IT WAS - WHAT OTHER PURPOSE WOULD THERE BE?
Everything included in an item's title is there to facilitate searches, otherwise,
no one would find anything (unless they added tags, just saying)
I suppose they could have added it there because they thought the arrangement
of the letters looked pleasing to the eye... but I doubt it.
|
The explanation is there because the name Baby Yoda is now known to be wrong
and has been added and kept not because that is his name but as an aid for people
that incorrectly use that term. If the explanation is not there, they will get
complaints / change requests saying the name is wrong and should be removed.
Hence the disclaimer, to put off those catalogue change requests.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | brickerking | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 18:05 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 38 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, yorbrick writes:
| | | | Yep, totally agree. However, the part that's funny (it's not really that
funny anymore since having to explain it over and over) is to say "Baby Yoda...
was added to the item's title merely to facilitate searches". OF COURSE
IT WAS - WHAT OTHER PURPOSE WOULD THERE BE?
Everything included in an item's title is there to facilitate searches, otherwise,
no one would find anything (unless they added tags, just saying)
I suppose they could have added it there because they thought the arrangement
of the letters looked pleasing to the eye... but I doubt it.
|
The explanation is there because the name Baby Yoda is now known to be wrong
and has been added and kept not because that is his name but as an aid for people
that incorrectly use that term. If the explanation is not there, they will get
complaints / change requests saying the name is wrong and should be removed.
Hence the disclaimer, to put off those catalogue change requests.
|
Right, the first part of the explaination addresses that. The last sentence is
unnecessary and makes me chuckle. Get it?
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 18:12 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| .
| |
Right, the first part of the explaination addresses that. The last sentence is
unnecessary and makes me chuckle. Get it?
|
Not really, no. It is explaining that it was added to aid searches with the implication
being that it is not there because the cataloguing crew believe that it is the
official name, as they know it isn't.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | brickerking | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 18:14 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, yorbrick writes:
| | .
| |
Right, the first part of the explaination addresses that. The last sentence is
unnecessary and makes me chuckle. Get it?
|
Not really, no. It is explaining that it was added to aid searches with the implication
being that it is not there because the cataloguing crew believe that it is the
official name, as they know it isn't.
|
I guess we just don't have the same sense of humour. Lucky you!
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 18:38 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, yorbrick writes:
| | .
| |
Right, the first part of the explaination addresses that. The last sentence is
unnecessary and makes me chuckle. Get it?
|
Not really, no. It is explaining that it was added to aid searches with the implication
being that it is not there because the cataloguing crew believe that it is the
official name, as they know it isn't.
|
I guess we just don't have the same sense of humour. Lucky you!
|
The fact that you are reading any kind of humor into the whole situation is in
itself quite humorous.
In any case, I have altered the note and made it less humorous for all involved.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | brickerking | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 19:19 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, randyf writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, yorbrick writes:
| | .
| |
Right, the first part of the explaination addresses that. The last sentence is
unnecessary and makes me chuckle. Get it?
|
Not really, no. It is explaining that it was added to aid searches with the implication
being that it is not there because the cataloguing crew believe that it is the
official name, as they know it isn't.
|
I guess we just don't have the same sense of humour. Lucky you!
|
The fact that you are reading any kind of humor into the whole situation is in
itself quite humorous.
In any case, I have altered the note and made it less humorous for all involved.
|
Hmm... now how do I use humour to get those seller tools developed?
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 19:23 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| | | Hmm... now how do I use humour to get those seller tools developed?
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 17:44 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| | |
Also, baby yoda is grogu who is also "the child". The minifigure name
is Din Grogu / The Child / 'Baby Yoda' which are all names of the character.
The first part of the "additional notes" explains baby yoda - the last
part is just passive aggressive and makes me chuckle.
|
He is NOT named Baby Yoda though. He was mistakenly referred to as that originally
and hence the incorrect name has stuck for some and keeping it in the name helps
those buyers that use the name. It could be removed now as the real name is known
but that would lead to those people that still call him Baby Yoda not being able
to find him. Hence the additional note explaining why the incorrect name is kept
in the minifigure entry.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | DeLuca | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2023 09:24 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | In Off Topic, randyf writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
| | I guess what makes me laugh is that it's a combative statement, like we are
expecting people to complain.
|
And it is not a combative statement. It is merely a statement of fact placed
there so that we do not get inundated with requests to remove the term from the
title.
|
OK, passive aggressive then.
If it wasn't, then we would have "additional notes" for this minifig,
right?
* | | 4j003a Construction Worker with Blue Shirt, Green Vest and Cap with the Word 'Brick', Sunglasses and Moustache
Minifigures: 4 Juniors |
Additional Notes: This is a non-descript juniors minifigure. We have added 'Brick'
to assist in search results.
|
but brick is printed on the figure and isn't a "nickname" for that
figure that is widely used that would confuse people
|
Sorry, that was just one of the first minifigs in the catalog. How about:
I could literally point to hundreds or thousands of examples.
|
but isn't sharon charter agent 13? (I've never watched the show/movie) meanwhile gorgu isn't baby yoda but just referred to as baby yoda
|
Sharon’s S.H.I.E.L.D. code name is “Agent 13” in both the comics and the MCU,
and it has been since her first appearance (from what I can tell). This Minifig’s
name is akin to “Iron Man (Tony Stark)” or “Captain America (Steve Rogers)”.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Jun 22, 2023 12:15 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| | | | | | | Sorry, that was just one of the first minifigs in the catalog. How about:
I could literally point to hundreds or thousands of examples.
|
but isn't sharon charter agent 13? (I've never watched the show/movie) meanwhile gorgu isn't baby yoda but just referred to as baby yoda
|
Sharon’s S.H.I.E.L.D. code name is “Agent 13” in both the comics and the MCU,
and it has been since her first appearance (from what I can tell). This Minifig’s
name is akin to “Iron Man (Tony Stark)” or “Captain America (Steve Rogers)”.
|
Good to know 👍
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 15:10 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 51 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, jennnifer writes:
| | Why is it needed? Maybe because the SW minifig community is particularly particular.
|
Bingo!
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 18:16 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
I, for one, think it’s walking on its kness and should therefore be called ‘Baby
Yogurt’, even if the colour is wrong.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | 1001bricks | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 18:25 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Off Topic, brickerking writes:
I, for one, think it’s walking on its kness and should therefore be called ‘Baby
Yogurt’, even if the colour is wrong.
|
A Baby Yourt???
You're all a bunch of crazies.
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | UTLF | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 19:08 | | Subject: | (Cancelled) | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| | (Cancelled) |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | 1001bricks | | Posted: | Jun 21, 2023 19:11 | | Subject: | Re: Baby Yoda Note Self Explanatory? | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Off Topic | |
|
| In Off Topic, 1P writes:
| | how do we know it's Baby Yoda and not Baby Yaddle?
|
yada yada yada...
|
|
|
|
|
Canada, Alberta
United Kingdom, England
USA, Ohio
France, Nouvelle-Aquitaine
