| Discussion Forum: Thread 336128 |
|
 |
| | | Author: | pathmer  | | Posted: | Mar 7, 2023 23:28 | | Subject: | Possible set inventory mistake | | Viewed: | 118 times | | Topic: | Inventories | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Hi I'm new, so not sure where to say this or if anyone cares. I noticed a
possible mistake in the inventory for the Black Monarch's Castle (6085-1).
It lists 5 light grey 2x2 as 3003old. but I still own my set from childhood and
it has the 3003 variation with the little support ridges on the inside. Maybe
there were differnet releases, I don't know. So not sure if it should have
both listed, or swapable, or what. Thanks.
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | pcthurman | | Posted: | Mar 8, 2023 00:40 | | Subject: | Re: Possible set inventory mistake | | Viewed: | 48 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
|
| In Inventories, pathmer writes:
| | Hi I'm new, so not sure where to say this or if anyone cares. I noticed a
possible mistake in the inventory for the Black Monarch's Castle (6085-1).
It lists 5 light grey 2x2 as 3003old. but I still own my set from childhood and
it has the 3003 variation with the little support ridges on the inside. Maybe
there were differnet releases, I don't know. So not sure if it should have
both listed, or swapable, or what. Thanks.
|
Were the pieces to the castle mixed in with other Lego pieces that did not go
to the castle or were the Lego from 6085 kept together and separate from all
other Lego?
3003old were used from 1954 through 1988 while 3003 were used from 1984 to present
day so there is some overlap.
Having just inventoried my own , it also had in it however,
all 185 lbs. of my collection were stored in large bins by color and all the
were used in Classic Space sets, , and when my
husband and I put all the sets back together again leaving none left for 6073
or 6085.
Cass T
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | pathmer | | Posted: | Mar 8, 2023 17:22 | | Subject: | Re: Possible set inventory mistake | | Viewed: | 47 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
|
| Could have mixed a little with my brother's castle which had 3 (3003) blocks.
But All 5 in my set are (3003) with 0 (3003old) so very unlikely that I lost
all 5, swapping all 3 with his set, and somehow finding 2 more somewhere. Box
and instructions both have 1988 copyright, so that would fit with overlap and
different releases.
In Inventories, pcthurman writes:
| | In Inventories, pathmer writes:
| | Hi I'm new, so not sure where to say this or if anyone cares. I noticed a
possible mistake in the inventory for the Black Monarch's Castle (6085-1).
It lists 5 light grey 2x2 as 3003old. but I still own my set from childhood and
it has the 3003 variation with the little support ridges on the inside. Maybe
there were differnet releases, I don't know. So not sure if it should have
both listed, or swapable, or what. Thanks.
|
Were the pieces to the castle mixed in with other Lego pieces that did not go
to the castle or were the Lego from 6085 kept together and separate from all
other Lego?
3003old were used from 1954 through 1988 while 3003 were used from 1984 to present
day so there is some overlap.
Having just inventoried my own , it also had in it however,
all 185 lbs. of my collection were stored in large bins by color and all the
were used in Classic Space sets, , and when my
husband and I put all the sets back together again leaving none left for 6073
or 6085.
Cass T
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Author: | pathmer | | Posted: | Mar 8, 2023 17:46 | | Subject: | Re: Possible set inventory mistake | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
|
| Change log shows that (3003) used to be listed as an alternate until Oct 2020,
but was deleted by user paulvdb.
In Inventories, pathmer writes:
| | Could have mixed a little with my brother's castle which had 3 (3003) blocks.
But All 5 in my set are (3003) with 0 (3003old) so very unlikely that I lost
all 5, swapping all 3 with his set, and somehow finding 2 more somewhere. Box
and instructions both have 1988 copyright, so that would fit with overlap and
different releases.
In Inventories, pcthurman writes:
| | In Inventories, pathmer writes:
| | Hi I'm new, so not sure where to say this or if anyone cares. I noticed a
possible mistake in the inventory for the Black Monarch's Castle (6085-1).
It lists 5 light grey 2x2 as 3003old. but I still own my set from childhood and
it has the 3003 variation with the little support ridges on the inside. Maybe
there were differnet releases, I don't know. So not sure if it should have
both listed, or swapable, or what. Thanks.
|
Were the pieces to the castle mixed in with other Lego pieces that did not go
to the castle or were the Lego from 6085 kept together and separate from all
other Lego?
3003old were used from 1954 through 1988 while 3003 were used from 1984 to present
day so there is some overlap.
Having just inventoried my own , it also had in it however,
all 185 lbs. of my collection were stored in large bins by color and all the
were used in Classic Space sets, , and when my
husband and I put all the sets back together again leaving none left for 6073
or 6085.
Cass T
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Mar 8, 2023 17:57 | | Subject: | Re: Possible set inventory mistake | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
|
| In Inventories, pathmer writes:
| | Change log shows that (3003) used to be listed as an alternate until Oct 2020,
but was deleted by user paulvdb.
|
See the comments in the discussion (bubbles icon) for the previous change made
on the same day: https://www.bricklink.com/messageThread.asp?ID=274513
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | pathmer | | Posted: | Mar 9, 2023 00:00 | | Subject: | Re: Possible set inventory mistake | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
|
| Thanks SylvainLS,
So because there is a slight chance that my set got those pieces mixed, does
that mean it is net credible enough evidence? I'm pretty confident that it
came with the (3003), just not 100% sure.
In Inventories, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Inventories, pathmer writes:
| | Change log shows that (3003) used to be listed as an alternate until Oct 2020,
but was deleted by user paulvdb.
|
See the comments in the discussion (bubbles icon) for the previous change made
on the same day: https://www.bricklink.com/messageThread.asp?ID=274513
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Mar 9, 2023 04:39 | | Subject: | Re: Possible set inventory mistake | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
|
| In Inventories, pathmer writes:
| | Thanks SylvainLS,
So because there is a slight chance that my set got those pieces mixed, does
that mean it is net credible enough evidence? I'm pretty confident that it
came with the (3003), just not 100% sure.
|
I don’t know, that’s the catalogue people’s decision 
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA, California
France, Nouvelle-Aquitaine