| Discussion Forum: Thread 325931 |
|
 |
| | | Author: | Stuart9  | | Posted: | Aug 21, 2022 11:01 | | Subject: | Should this be a new version of widow 33 | | Viewed: | 96 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | | For: | Catalog Associate | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Proposing this needs a new entry, see photo’s.
Should this be : 33bc02 ?
As 33bc01 but no hole in top.
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | Shiny_Stuff | | Posted: | Aug 21, 2022 11:54 | | Subject: | Re: Should this be a new version of widow 33 | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, Stuart9 writes:
| | Proposing this needs a new entry, see photo’s.
Should this be : 33bc02 ?
As 33bc01 but no hole in top.
|
Some of these old doors had fixed glass, so no hole was needed.
The hole was there to hold the glass in place on those with non-fixed glass.
I don't see any point in making separate entries for an item this old --
sellers can simply describe which version they have, either fixed glass or loose
glass or no glass.
____
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | Stuart9 | | Posted: | Aug 21, 2022 12:14 | | Subject: | Re: Should this be a new version of widow 33 | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| Most of these early windows have numerous variations given seperate entries on
BL, this would simply follow those examples.
In Catalog Requests, Shiny_Stuff writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, Stuart9 writes:
| | Proposing this needs a new entry, see photo’s.
Should this be : 33bc02 ?
As 33bc01 but no hole in top.
|
Some of these old doors had fixed glass, so no hole was needed.
The hole was there to hold the glass in place on those with non-fixed glass.
I don't see any point in making separate entries for an item this old --
sellers can simply describe which version they have, either fixed glass or loose
glass or no glass.
____
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | Stuart9 | | Posted: | Aug 21, 2022 12:42 | | Subject: | Re: Should this be a new version of widow 33 | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| For widow/window read door wherever I’ve made that mistake. Doh !!!!
In Catalog Requests, Stuart9 writes:
| | Proposing this needs a new entry, see photo’s.
Should this be : 33bc02 ?
As 33bc01 but no hole in top.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Aug 21, 2022 13:03 | | Subject: | Re: Should this be a new version of widow 33 | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, Stuart9 writes:
| | For widow/window read door wherever I’ve made that mistake. Doh !!!!
|
Freudian slip? Does your wife need to be careful when she’s near windows and
you’re in the same room? 
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Author: | Stuart9 | | Posted: | Aug 21, 2022 13:08 | | Subject: | Re: Should this be a new version of widow 33 | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| Not really, I’m the one with a fear of heights and a decent insurance policy.
In Catalog Requests, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Catalog Requests, Stuart9 writes:
| | For widow/window read door wherever I’ve made that mistake. Doh !!!!
|
Freudian slip? Does your wife need to be careful when she’s near windows and
you’re in the same room?
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Aug 21, 2022 13:16 | | Subject: | Re: Should this be a new version of widow 33 | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| In Catalog Requests, Stuart9 writes:
| | Not really, I’m the one with a fear of heights and a decent insurance policy.
|
Then it’s a premonition. Your subconscious is trying to warn you, Stuart! Stay
on the ground!
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | Stuart9 | | Posted: | Aug 21, 2022 15:42 | | Subject: | Re: Should this be a new version of widow 33 | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Catalog Requests | |
|
| Just found a hollow stud version of 646ac01, the lip is std, not extended.
The holes on top match this one and not the listed hollow stud version which
are further apart.
This too should have its own entry.
In Catalog Requests, Stuart9 writes:
| | Proposing this needs a new entry, see photo’s.
Should this be : 33bc02 ?
As 33bc01 but no hole in top.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom, England
)
)
)
USA, New York
France, Nouvelle-Aquitaine
)
)