Discussion Forum: Thread 324939 |
|
|
| | Author: | PBM | Posted: | Aug 1, 2022 18:21 | Subject: | Baggie identification? | Viewed: | 132 times | Topic: | General | |
|
| Has anyone documented the bag numbers inside of the sets?
We have this bag and would like to save the "3 part rule" to identify if possible.
Thank you.
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | macebobo | Posted: | Aug 1, 2022 19:36 | Subject: | Re: Baggie identification? | Viewed: | 35 times | Topic: | General | |
|
| In General, PBM writes:
| Has anyone documented the bag numbers inside of the sets?
We have this bag and would like to save the "3 part rule" to identify if possible.
Thank you.
|
What, pray tell, is the "3 part rule?"
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | taxan | Posted: | Aug 1, 2022 19:46 | Subject: | Re: Baggie identification? | Viewed: | 51 times | Topic: | General | |
|
| In General, macebobo writes:
| In General, PBM writes:
| Has anyone documented the bag numbers inside of the sets?
We have this bag and would like to save the "3 part rule" to identify if possible.
Thank you.
|
What, pray tell, is the "3 part rule?"
|
Have no clue what the "3 part rule?" is, but the bag is from:
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | Aug 1, 2022 19:53 | Subject: | Re: Baggie identification? | Viewed: | 43 times | Topic: | General | |
|
| dont think it is since in the bag there is a large trans-black windscreen and
that set doesn't have one and that set doesn't have any sand green and
there's lots of it in the bag. I think the other guy has it
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Author: | taxan | Posted: | Aug 1, 2022 20:14 | Subject: | Re: Baggie identification? | Viewed: | 50 times | Topic: | General | |
|
| In General, Nubs_Select writes:
| dont think it is since in the bag there is a large trans-black windscreen and
that set doesn't have one and that set doesn't have any sand green and
there's lots of it in the bag. I think the other guy has it
|
Then i got the color of the Bracket (36841) wrong It looked like white to me
not LBG.
And a note: You can search for up to 3 part in any bag you want to identify here.
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogIn.asp?utm_content=subnav
Just get the color right
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | PBM | Posted: | Aug 1, 2022 21:51 | Subject: | Re: Baggie identification? | Viewed: | 30 times | Topic: | General | |
|
| In General, taxan writes:
| In General, Nubs_Select writes:
| dont think it is since in the bag there is a large trans-black windscreen and
that set doesn't have one and that set doesn't have any sand green and
there's lots of it in the bag. I think the other guy has it
|
Then i got the color of the Bracket (36841) wrong It looked like white to me
not LBG.
And a note: You can search for up to 3 part in any bag you want to identify here.
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogIn.asp?utm_content=subnav
Just get the color right
|
Yes. If you have 3 parts from a baggie you can get the choices of sets down
to single digits and figure out what set the baggie is from.
But each bag has a number on it, wonder if those cross reference to the set?
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | Hexy | Posted: | Aug 1, 2022 19:45 | Subject: | Re: Baggie identification? | Viewed: | 50 times | Topic: | General | |
|
|
In General, PBM writes:
| Has anyone documented the bag numbers inside of the sets?
We have this bag and would like to save the "3 part rule" to identify if possible.
Thank you.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | maxx3001 | Posted: | Aug 2, 2022 02:07 | Subject: | Re: Baggie identification? | Viewed: | 38 times | Topic: | General | |
|
| In General, Hexy writes:
What happened to Boba’s Slave I ?
Never heard of his ‘Starship’ before…….
| In General, PBM writes:
| Has anyone documented the bag numbers inside of the sets?
We have this bag and would like to save the "3 part rule" to identify if possible.
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | Aug 2, 2022 02:16 | Subject: | Re: Baggie identification? | Viewed: | 42 times | Topic: | General | |
|
| I think they changed it since they didn’t want to use the word “slave” although
I think they ended up using a different excuse but it’s been a while so I don’t
remember exactly
|
|
|
|
|
|