| Discussion Forum: Thread 320550 |
|
 |
| | | Author: | randyipp  | | Posted: | Apr 30, 2022 23:14 | | Subject: | Question about set 1258-1 | | Viewed: | 61 times | | Topic: | Inventories | | Status: | Open | |
|
| So I cracked open a few tiny technic sets
And inventory seems good, I did have an extra rubber band in each but the issue
I am having is that it appears that 1258 actually has
see comparison photo, these were sealed boxes, sealed bags. Does it make sense
to change it or add it as an alternate?
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | randyipp | | Posted: | Apr 30, 2022 23:16 | | Subject: | Re: Question about set 1258-1 | | Viewed: | 25 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
|
| In Inventories, randyipp writes:
| | So I cracked open a few tiny technic sets
And inventory seems good, I did have an extra rubber band in each but the issue
I am having is that it appears that 1258 actually has
see comparison photo, these were sealed boxes, sealed bags. Does it make sense
to change it or add it as an alternate?
|
or are all these actually
just a bit on the smaller side?
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | randyf | | Posted: | May 1, 2022 05:52 | | Subject: | Re: Question about set 1258-1 | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
|
| In Inventories, randyipp writes:
| | So I cracked open a few tiny technic sets
And inventory seems good, I did have an extra rubber band in each but the issue
I am having is that it appears that 1258 actually has
|
I believe you are correct in your assumption. Those do look like x88.
| | see comparison photo, these were sealed boxes, sealed bags. Does it make sense
to change it or add it as an alternate?
|
I would have the inventory changed.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | randyipp | | Posted: | May 1, 2022 12:28 | | Subject: | Re: Question about set 1258-1 | | Viewed: | 23 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
|
| In Inventories, randyf writes:
| | I believe you are correct in your assumption. Those do look like x88.
I would have the inventory changed.
|
Ok, thanks for that!
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA, New Hampshire
