Discussion Forum: Thread 269916 |
|
|
| | Author: | primadeluxe | Posted: | Jun 16, 2020 01:34 | Subject: | Tubes baseplates from the 70's vs newer ones | Viewed: | 125 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
|
| All the baseplates from the 70's, which I have from original sets, have different
tubes (do you call them tubes?) compared with newer baseplates. I do not know
when this chance took place, but is it worth to add a note for these baseplates
as they come in different variations?
It would be a lot of work making pictures aspecially with all the baseplates
with white dots and I certainly do not have them all.
On the attached picture is a example from set 648-1. On the right the original
one from the 70's and on the left a newer one.
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | novabrick | Posted: | Jun 16, 2020 01:39 | Subject: | Re: Tubes baseplates from the 70's vs newer ones | Viewed: | 39 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, primadeluxe writes:
| All the baseplates from the 70's, which I have from original sets, have different
tubes (do you call them tubes?) compared with newer baseplates. I do not know
when this chance took place, but is it worth to add a note for these baseplates
as they come in different variations?
It would be a lot of work making pictures aspecially with all the baseplates
with white dots and I certainly do not have them all.
On the attached picture is a example from set 648-1. On the right the original
one from the 70's and on the left a newer one.
|
It's true though we have similar looking undersides like this with sharp
edges around the hole and more curved ones.
I have the suspision they cut smaller baseplates from bigger ones. at least I
have seen plenty of edges that look cut. But this might be a custom job from
the people we bought it from.
Christian
novabrick-team
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | tonnic | Posted: | Jun 16, 2020 04:29 | Subject: | Re: Tubes baseplates from the 70's vs newer ones | Viewed: | 30 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, novabrick writes:
| In Catalog, primadeluxe writes:
| All the baseplates from the 70's, which I have from original sets, have different
tubes (do you call them tubes?) compared with newer baseplates. I do not know
when this chance took place, but is it worth to add a note for these baseplates
as they come in different variations?
It would be a lot of work making pictures aspecially with all the baseplates
with white dots and I certainly do not have them all.
On the attached picture is a example from set 648-1. On the right the original
one from the 70's and on the left a newer one.
|
It's true though we have similar looking undersides like this with sharp
edges around the hole and more curved ones.
I have the suspision they cut smaller baseplates from bigger ones. at least I
have seen plenty of edges that look cut. But this might be a custom job from
the people we bought it from.
Christian
novabrick-team
|
They are cut of a larger in factory, cut to the size that was needed.
That is why older baseplates may have the whiter looking stressmarks.
I always mention this in my description so buyers know what they buy.
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Author: | StormChaser | Posted: | Jun 16, 2020 03:43 | Subject: | Re: Tubes baseplates from the 70's vs newer ones | Viewed: | 40 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| In Catalog, primadeluxe writes:
| (do you call them tubes?)
|
I would say underside indentions.
| is it worth to add a note for these baseplates
|
I would say it wouldn't hurt anything.
| as they come in different variations?
|
I would agree.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Author: | primadeluxe | Posted: | Jun 16, 2020 04:02 | Subject: | Re: Tubes baseplates from the 70's vs newer ones | Viewed: | 23 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
|
| Ok, I have submitted a request for this part 3865.
In Catalog, StormChaser writes:
| In Catalog, primadeluxe writes:
| (do you call them tubes?)
|
I would say underside indentions.
| is it worth to add a note for these baseplates
|
I would say it wouldn't hurt anything.
| as they come in different variations?
|
I would agree.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|