| Discussion Forum: Thread 229163 |
|
 |
| | | Author: | 1977_mauro  | | Posted: | Dec 9, 2017 14:10 | | Subject: | Inventory Change Request for Set 10252-1 | | Viewed: | 69 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests (Entry) | | Status: | Open | |
|
| Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 3 Part 54200 Trans-Clear Slope 30 1 x 1 x 2/3 (Alternate) (match ID 1)
* Add 1 Part 54200 Trans-Clear Slope 30 1 x 1 x 2/3 (Alternate) (match ID 1)
* Change 3 Part Trans-Medium Blue 54200 Slope 30 1 x 1 x 2/3 {match ID 0 to 1}
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | 1977_mauro | | Posted: | Dec 9, 2017 14:12 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 10252-1 | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| Could someone help me out, how I can make an alternate for an extra part?
In this case there are 3 regular parts and 1 extra part.
I wanted to add 2 new alternate entries, with quantity 3 as regular parts and
quantity 1 as extra part, but for the extra part I am not able to set the match
ID...
Thanks Mauro
In Inventories Requests, 1977_mauro writes:
| | Please make changes to the following inventory:
* Add 3 Part 54200 Trans-Clear Slope 30 1 x 1 x 2/3 (Alternate) (match ID 1)
* Add 1 Part 54200 Trans-Clear Slope 30 1 x 1 x 2/3 (Alternate) (match ID 1)
* Change 3 Part Trans-Medium Blue 54200 Slope 30 1 x 1 x 2/3 {match ID 0 to 1}
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Dec 10, 2017 04:54 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 10252-1 | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, 1977_mauro writes:
| | In this case there are 3 regular parts and 1 extra part.
I wanted to add 2 new alternate entries, with quantity 3 as regular parts and
quantity 1 as extra part, but for the extra part I am not able to set the match
ID...
|
It is not possible to do this with an inventory request, although I have the
ability to add Match IDs to parts in the Extras section.
Stand by on this request, please. I am consulting with BrickLink management
to see how they want this issue handled on their website.
Interestingly, the set instructions actually show the trans-clear part in both
the set build and the parts list in the back.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Author: | normann1974 | | Posted: | Dec 10, 2017 10:27 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 10252-1 | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, StormChaser writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, 1977_mauro writes:
| | In this case there are 3 regular parts and 1 extra part.
I wanted to add 2 new alternate entries, with quantity 3 as regular parts and
quantity 1 as extra part, but for the extra part I am not able to set the match
ID...
|
It is not possible to do this with an inventory request, although I have the
ability to add Match IDs to parts in the Extras section.
Stand by on this request, please. I am consulting with BrickLink management
to see how they want this issue handled on their website.
Interestingly, the set instructions actually show the trans-clear part in both
the set build and the parts list in the back.
|
Take a look at
This set adds the regular and extra altenates under one alternate entry. Is that
not what is needed here?
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Dec 10, 2017 14:14 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 10252-1 | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, normann1974 writes:
| | This set adds the regular and extra altenates under one alternate entry. Is that
not what is needed here?
|
Maybe. What about the way it's done here?
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | normann1974 | | Posted: | Dec 10, 2017 18:38 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 10252-1 | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, StormChaser writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, normann1974 writes:
| | This set adds the regular and extra altenates under one alternate entry. Is that
not what is needed here?
|
Maybe. What about the way it's done here?
|
IMHO that's a better way to do it. I hope that a decision will be made on
which solution is to be used, and I hope sets not conforming to the chosen solution
will be updated. 
Best wishes,
Jan
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | 1977_mauro | | Posted: | Dec 11, 2017 03:09 | | Subject: | (Cancelled) | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| | (Cancelled) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | 1977_mauro | | Posted: | Dec 11, 2017 03:11 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 10252-1 | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| My approach is different to the both above bu the both are clearly better then
mine.
So I will wait for the decision.
Mauro
In Inventories Requests, normann1974 writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, StormChaser writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, normann1974 writes:
| | This set adds the regular and extra altenates under one alternate entry. Is that
not what is needed here?
|
Maybe. What about the way it's done here?
|
IMHO that's a better way to do it. I hope that a decision will be made on
which solution is to be used, and I hope sets not conforming to the chosen solution
will be updated.
Best wishes,
Jan
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | StormChaser | | Posted: | Dec 11, 2017 19:27 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 10252-1 | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| In Inventories Requests, 1977_mauro writes:
| | So I will wait for the decision.
|
I have gone with the approach seen here:
I have approved your requests and updated the inventory.
| | I hope sets not conforming to the chosen solution will be updated.
|
I believe in consistency, but for the time being no changes will be made to existing
set inventories. I have suggested a solution to management which will require
a bit of coding, but should result in a more accurate reflection in inventories
of this type of situation.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | 1977_mauro | | Posted: | Dec 16, 2017 06:09 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 10252-1 | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Inventories Requests | |
|
| This ist perfect, thank you.
It will be good, when the requester will be able to do that by himself.
Mauro
In Inventories Requests, StormChaser writes:
| | In Inventories Requests, 1977_mauro writes:
| | So I will wait for the decision.
|
I have gone with the approach seen here:
I have approved your requests and updated the inventory.
| | I hope sets not conforming to the chosen solution will be updated.
|
I believe in consistency, but for the time being no changes will be made to existing
set inventories. I have suggested a solution to management which will require
a bit of coding, but should result in a more accurate reflection in inventories
of this type of situation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany, Baden-Württemberg
USA, Oklahoma
Denmark
