| Discussion Forum: Thread 187679 |
|
 |
| | | Author: | WILYKAT  | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2015 02:05 | | Subject: | suggest fixing the offline image | | Viewed: | 156 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Discarded | |
|
| The offline image still shows illegal non-LEGO part being used for hinges on
the top. I would suggest using
and
they can form equivalent 2x2 to 2x2 hinge plates and is 100% legal LEGO build.
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | MassBricks | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2015 02:57 | | Subject: | Re: suggest fixing the offline image | | Viewed: | 50 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, WILYKAT writes:
| | The offline image still shows illegal non-LEGO part being used for hinges on
the top. I would suggest using
and
they can form equivalent 2x2 to 2x2 hinge plates and is 100% legal LEGO build.
|
I would also suggest not using copyrighted material if BrickLink does not have
permission from the copyright holder (Disney).
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | WILYKAT | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2015 05:24 | | Subject: | Re: suggest fixing the offline image | | Viewed: | 42 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, MassBricks writes:
| | In Suggestions, WILYKAT writes:
| | The offline image still shows illegal non-LEGO part being used for hinges on
the top. I would suggest using
and
they can form equivalent 2x2 to 2x2 hinge plates and is 100% legal LEGO build.
|
I would also suggest not using copyrighted material if BrickLink does not have
permission from the copyright holder (Disney).
|
Where does it say the picture is Star Wars themed? It's just mere coincidence
that the 2 minifigs look like copyrighted character from the movie. The rest
of the moc doesn't have any Disney look or feel.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Author: | MassBricks | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2015 06:40 | | Subject: | Re: suggest fixing the offline image | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, WILYKAT writes:
| | Where does it say the picture is Star Wars themed? It's just mere coincidence
that the 2 minifigs look like copyrighted character from the movie. The rest
of the moc doesn't have any Disney look or feel.
|
Haha..
I just know Disney is not an entity you want to get a lawsuit from.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Author: | Nordbart | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2015 06:44 | | Subject: | Re: suggest fixing the offline image | | Viewed: | 30 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, MassBricks writes:
| | In Suggestions, WILYKAT writes:
| | Where does it say the picture is Star Wars themed? It's just mere coincidence
that the 2 minifigs look like copyrighted character from the movie. The rest
of the moc doesn't have any Disney look or feel.
|
Haha..
I just know Disney is not an entity you want to get a lawsuit from.
|
On one side, this is fanart and therefor ok. On the other side this is a Commercial
side. But what about all those minifig Images in the catalog?
There are arguments for both side here.
Nordbart
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Author: | WILYKAT | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2015 06:56 | | Subject: | Re: suggest fixing the offline image | | Viewed: | 39 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, MassBricks writes:
| | In Suggestions, WILYKAT writes:
| | Where does it say the picture is Star Wars themed? It's just mere coincidence
that the 2 minifigs look like copyrighted character from the movie. The rest
of the moc doesn't have any Disney look or feel.
|
Haha..
I just know Disney is not an entity you want to get a lawsuit from.
|
Yeah :/ if I tried to sell a set of 3 circles, 2 small and one large they'd
probably claim I am ripping off the silhouette of a certain mouse. They are a
tad touchy about copyright issues.
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | Nordbart | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2015 03:02 | | Subject: | Re: suggest fixing the offline image | | Viewed: | 45 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, WILYKAT writes:
| | The offline image still shows illegal non-LEGO part being used for hinges on
the top. I would suggest using
and
they can form equivalent 2x2 to 2x2 hinge plates and is 100% legal LEGO build.
|
Why did I see this Topic comming? After every downtime the same complaints Keep
coming up. 
Nordbart
PS: My Suggestion would be an original MOC-Picture, not just a SW moc.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | WoutR | | Posted: | Apr 22, 2015 04:00 | | Subject: | Re: suggest fixing the offline image | | Viewed: | 48 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Nordbart writes:
| | In Suggestions, WILYKAT writes:
| | The offline image still shows illegal non-LEGO part being used for hinges on
the top. I would suggest using p=60478 and p=63868
they can form equivalent 2x2 to 2x2 hinge plates and is 100% legal LEGO build.
|
|
They cannot replace the hinges because they did not make the MOC.
They would have to build something new (and yes, only LEGO please).
I wonder if it is used with permission, or if they just removed the photographers
mark.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/storm_tk431/6599195483/
| | Why did I see this Topic comming? After every downtime the same complaints Keep
coming up.
Nordbart
|
Because sadly nobody cared enough to actually change the image.
| | PS: My Suggestion would be an original MOC-Picture, not just a SW moc.
|
Yes please!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA, Michigan
Germany, Schleswig-Holstein
Netherlands, Zuid-Holland