BrickLink Discussion Forum

.... nice!

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Nov 12, 2018 07:29

Subject:

Re: Metalbeard Parts list

Viewed:

35 times

Topic:

Inventories

In LEGO, Lauren_Luke writes:

[mwright5] writes:

Anyone have a list for Metalbeard?

Yes, I have.

funny....

but here's one too: http://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemInv.asp?S=70810-1

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Nov 3, 2018 16:35

Subject:

Re: LEGO brown plus guns

Viewed:

31 times

Topic:

Colors

In LEGO, Skylar2010 writes:

Are all these guns LEGO?
And are all these browns minus the pants reddish brown?

All Lego except the white in the top left I guess

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Nov 3, 2018 11:13

Subject:

,,,,,where's an Admin when you need one...?

Viewed:

139 times

Topic:

Catalog

Status:

Open

....

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Oct 5, 2018 02:37

Subject:

Re: Restrictions kill sales! I'm outta here!

Viewed:

118 times

Topic:

RTFM ?

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Sep 24, 2018 14:01

Subject:

Re: Stopping/Checking inflated prices

Viewed:

71 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, tpr writes:

Hi

Probably a lot of us have been guilty of this, adding an item to your inventory
and forgetting the decimal point, or putting it in the wrong place, thereby creating
an abnormal price.

Is it possible when entering a price for new or used, to flag if the price entered
is say more than xx% of the average prices already on file. Still giving you
the option to enter that price, but just warning that this price is abnormal

Thanks
Tracy

Discussed and proposed many times before, but still no sign of implementing something
like this.... Focus was on other points I guess. Something with Stud.IO and a
designer competetion sort of thing....

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Aug 18, 2018 06:56

Subject:

Differentiate in SALES

Viewed:

87 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

Sales are nice thing, right? Scoring a bulk load of 1x1 plates you so desperately
need for a long overdue project helps you move on!
When 70% of the sales announcements concern shops that do NOT ship to you, the
nice efforts turn into an ever growing deception....

So here's my suggestion: have a SALE announcement link to the shipping terms
of the store so there will be ONLY announcement visible that actually DO ship
to your country.

Ever working on a more pleasant environment.

StarBrick

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Apr 8, 2018 04:15

Subject:

Re: “Report” Button

Viewed:

38 times

Topic:

YES PLEASE!!!

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Mar 7, 2018 15:03

Subject:

Re: Separate professional and private sellers

Viewed:

36 times

Topic:

I know of an ex-car dealer who was bored with his job and quit but continued
to buy and sell used cars as an individual for a couple of years (then he was
re-hired as a “seller extraordinary” because he was that good). He knew the
rules pretty well and limited himself to less than (I think it’s) ten cars a
year. Buy a used car, keep it a few weeks, sell the car. He managed to make
a hefty profit. All legal, and not as a pro.

Is that a business? Or someone who loves to have another car every few weeks
and makes money along the way?
Has he become a business by doing so?

The main issue here is how to differentiate between the seller, selling of his
or hers overstock with the intention to get rid of it and the seller purchasing
and reselling parts/sets etc with the intention to generate profit with it

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Dec 29, 2017 04:25

Subject:

Re: "My Inventory" Feature

Viewed:

25 times

Topic:

you can have this on rebrickable.... (among others

)

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Dec 9, 2017 05:06

Subject:

Re: Admin: complete Store verification process

Viewed:

59 times

Topic:

Please generate a help ticket for this well-described issue too!
Maybe that works faster

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Mar 21, 2017 02:58

Subject:

Re: Counterfiet Set Reporting

Viewed:

92 times

Topic:

Might even be real China-made parts. The plastic from that factory does have
similar differences from the other factories worldwide.
So, is it real, really counterfeit or just a misenterpretation of the fact Lego
had quality issues in China ....?

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Mar 14, 2017 14:09

Subject:

Re: Better Forum

Viewed:

68 times

Topic:

+1

Many times suggested before, complaints enough to search trough, no improvement
seen still.... damn, was this actually on the idealist at all I wonder ?

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Aug 30, 2016 14:04

Subject:

Re: Wanted List > Upload Error:item dont exist

Viewed:

39 times

Topic:

You mean before we had a RED line telling what item was wrong so you can easily
correct it?
Now we don't....
I like the suggestion

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jun 18, 2016 10:06

Subject:

Re: Time not informative?

Viewed:

21 times

Topic:

EDT = Eastern Daylight Time

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jun 18, 2016 10:04

Subject:

Re: Payment Method - Default

Viewed:

27 times

Topic:

Great! got this to the helpdesk already
The said this was the algoritm:

---start of snippet---
This is the order in which defaults are selected:

1. Match to previous order (if any exist)
2. Paypal Onsite
3. Paypal
4. First listed payment option
---end of snippet---

You want to edit this as a seller!

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jun 15, 2016 11:57

Subject:

Search for parts of specific set in store....

Viewed:

38 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

In your own store inventory, you can search for parts of a specific set. See
attached picture.
In the buying area of a store, this is not possible.
The functionality is there, please add it to the buying area.

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Mar 9, 2016 13:29

Subject:

Re: instant checkout: please add iDeal

Viewed:

39 times

Topic:

o jij draak....

In English: O you dragon....

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Feb 8, 2015 05:47

Subject:

Re: Time to address seller quality issues

Viewed:

61 times

Topic:

Spot on.

On uploading used parts, I always check for my self: "Would I be happy to receive
this?" Whenever the anser is NO, the part goes into the bin, unless it's
a rare piece. In that case, I try to describe as detailed as possible the condition
of the part.

Maintaining high standards for oneself prevents in most cases selling crappy
parts.

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jan 25, 2015 10:18

Subject:

Re: EU directive // For Sellers who charge PP%

Viewed:

41 times

Topic:

Denk dat ik je voorbeeld maar ga volgen.... Benieuwd of het echt kopers scheelt
zoals sommigen beweren

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jan 25, 2015 07:57

Subject:

Re: EU directive // For Sellers who charge PP%

Viewed:

27 times

Topic:

A: Because I always obey all the laws *to the letter*, of course

Also because I can not stand people who are immune to reasoning.

Ouch, if that is serious, you're in a living hell ...

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jan 25, 2015 07:44

Subject:

Re: EU directive // Advice of PP-fee-less operate

Viewed:

35 times

Topic:

Might this be an option:

- calculate 10% fee
- receive payment
- refund any overcalculated fee after payment was received

Or will this alse affect the percentage and therefor costs made?

Man, thinking about this might even get me PP-fee-less in the near future. But
at higher item prices? Is that what most PP-fee-less sellers do? Help me out
with some GOOD advice people....

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jan 25, 2015 07:38

Subject:

Re: EU directive // For Sellers who charge PP%

Viewed:

25 times

Topic:

Personal rates are only for 'personal transfers', transfer for goods
are 'commercial', regardless wether you have a personal, premier or business
account

Mmmm, that makes it even harder.
Just checked my last 8 payments on PP (USD and EUR, 5 different countries). Overall
fee is 5.6%. Ranging from a 3.6% to 8.1%.
How can you get a cost table implemented like that that can be explained and
maintained as well?

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jan 25, 2015 07:36

Subject:

Re: EU directive // For Sellers who charge PP%

Viewed:

30 times

Topic:

Q: what made you the crusader of EU law?
Just curious

.....

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jan 25, 2015 07:20

Subject:

Re: EU directive // For Sellers who charge PP%

Viewed:

31 times

Topic:

Ah, these are the commercial rates.
I was looking at the personal rates.
As I am a hobbiest seller and not registered as a commercial user of PP, I think
the personal rates apply. Correct? Or does PP not distinguish between them?

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jan 25, 2015 07:17

Subject:

Re: EU directive // For Sellers who charge PP%

Viewed:

31 times

Topic:

VS, Canada, Europa I**
0,5% = balance payment
3,9% + vaste kosten = credit cards

That's for Belgium sellers receiving payments from for instance Holland.
Correct?
Or am I looking at the wrong tables?

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jan 25, 2015 07:12

Subject:

Re: EU directive // For Sellers who charge PP%

Viewed:

38 times

Topic:

According to my table that's for credit card payments through PP, not balance.
Or am I wrong here?

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jan 25, 2015 07:10

Subject:

Re: EU directive // For Sellers who charge PP%

Viewed:

42 times

Topic:

Mmm, checking

If I buy from you and apply what PP tells me

PayPal charges sellers a fee of between 1,7% and 3,4% of the total sale plus
€0,35 EUR per transaction within the Euro zone.

Then you're still cooked

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jan 25, 2015 07:02

Subject:

Re: EU directive // For Sellers who charge PP%

Viewed:

54 times

Topic:

Made me adjust my PP costs anyway. I was way over the current table of costs
at the PP site. Thanks for pointing me to that!

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jan 25, 2015 06:53

Subject:

Re: EU directive // For Sellers who charge PP%

Viewed:

46 times

Topic:

Incorrect article? Where is art. 19 regarding payments?

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jan 25, 2015 06:51

Subject:

Re: EU directive // For Sellers who charge PP%

Viewed:

66 times

Topic:

These rules you refer to, apply to commercial business only as far as I can follow
it through. So this might only be applied to those.

As all sellers and buyers alike we are expected to operate within the law.
So either we should implement ALL laws from ALL countries BL has members from,
or there's a general rule that we all stick to the local laws from the country
the seller is based in. No need to add some specific rules and leave others out.
It's either ALL or NOTHING....

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Oct 29, 2014 09:33

Subject:

Re: Stop Bogus Sellers

Viewed:

49 times

Topic:

How would they do that??

Easy, follow up fast on this kind of notification. BUT: report them through HelpDesk
and NOT only in the forum. The forum gets far less attention by CS than the HelpDesk
calls!

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Oct 1, 2014 13:05

Subject:

Re: Set quoting OFF in forum posts

Viewed:

32 times

Topic:

All you have to do to avoid that is simply to delete the text you didn't
write! This feature would be completely pointless when designers could be
working on more important things!

Like cosmetic overhauling the front page

?

I do delete the non-relevant parts (see this reply for instance) in my replies.
Most users don't, that can be annoying to quickly read through a thread with
20+ replies.
I guess your activity on the forum is not that big, so your not annoyed by it

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Oct 1, 2014 07:08

Subject:

Re: Set quoting OFF in forum posts

Viewed:

50 times

Topic:

How do you change the setting to "off" anyways?

You can't as a user. It is coded in the system....

And lastly... use a screen of proper size and resolution, so you dont need to
abuse your mouse/PGDWN keys

Try to find a monitor that big......!

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Oct 1, 2014 06:50

Subject:

Re: Set quoting OFF in forum posts

Viewed:

59 times

Topic:

That option is better indeed, but needs more programming

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Oct 1, 2014 06:39

Subject:

Set quoting OFF in forum posts

Viewed:

177 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

In replying to forum posts, the standard system setting is to quote the post
you are replying to. This generates LARGE texts that one has to scroll through
to get the additional post made by the poster.

Please set this standard to OFF:

- makes the forumposts cleaner
- readingspeed increases
- mouses/PGDWN-keys will last longer due to less scrolling
- less data storage needed on servers

(has been requested two times before, no follow-up unfortunately)

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Sep 23, 2014 09:02

Subject:

Re: Cap on number of message i can send

Viewed:

77 times

Topic:

there's a 4 -letter word in his username that is quite odd too

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Sep 18, 2014 15:58

Subject:

Re: Negative Feedback Note

Viewed:

56 times

Topic:

Thanks!
Voted YES!!!

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Sep 15, 2014 02:25

Subject:

NSS / NRS Overhaul

Viewed:

226 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

(probably multiple times suggested before....)

Overhaul of the NSS/NRS system required.

Regarding recent posts of blocked shops due to a cummulation of three (!) NSS's
over the last few years (!!), this system needs an overhaul.

1) NSS / NSR are in effect NO longer than a fixed time; for instance 6 months
2) users can ALWAYS review their scores on ALL the codes (NSS/NRS/NPB/OCR/etc....)
availabe for classifying orders (the data must be in the database.

Short post, needs more work, I know. Please add when wanted....... or when you
miss stuff.

If there IS a way to check your scores, please post it here AND (@ADMIN/@TECHSTAFF),
add it to the MyBrickLink page PLEASE.

Cheers
StarBrick

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Aug 21, 2014 14:03

Subject:

Re: Store View Tabs Missing [SOLUTION]

Viewed:

45 times

Topic:

Cool,
love the forum, love the members here!
Cheers!

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Aug 21, 2014 13:18

Subject:

Re: Store View Tabs Missing [SOLUTION]

Viewed:

50 times

Topic:

Wow, did you post this to the helpdesk too?

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Aug 20, 2014 15:33

Subject:

Re: BL Development Team: Test before rollout!

Viewed:

43 times

Topic:

Scott,

You just joined the gang

When's the first meeting at the clubhouse?

Cheers

StarBrick

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jun 16, 2014 10:55

Subject:

Re: Fee deduction program

Viewed:

43 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, speshy writes:

Sorry to be the only voice of dissent so far, but I am going to have to vote
"no" for this one, and it's not just because I haven't yet contributed
anything to the catalog.

No need for a sorry, free speak, free thought

I would also not be so interested in accepting "points" as payment, because my
fees aren't too high to begin with, being a small store. Points for free
sets, though? That I like.

So, basically you do favor a rewarding system, but don't agree on the reward?
Confusing.... You can not be pro another reward and be anti the rewarding system.
That doesn't add up.

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jun 16, 2014 09:50

Subject:

Re: Fee deduction program

Viewed:

35 times

Topic:

I think it would be automated. No different than fee accumulation, and any other
data that BL is handling at the moment. This site is already set up for this
sort of information.

Yes indeed it is. Just other ways of using the data, easy for the coding wizzards.

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jun 16, 2014 09:49

Subject:

Re: Fee deduction program -> BAP!!!

Viewed:

45 times

Topic:

And what about those who already contributed massive amounts of work on the catalog??
Kinda unfair since at this point there is more in the catalog from prior people,
than being added.

Where that came frome is stored in the database, so that can be used to give
points to admissions placed already. Also that's a small coding job I guess

Data is there, infrastructure too, it all needs some thinking and programming
and then LAUNCHING the BrickLink Appreciation Program = BAP!!!

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jun 16, 2014 09:47

Subject:

Re: Fee deduction program

Viewed:

39 times

Topic:

Who will do all the bookwork for these points? Will BrickLink end up paying
someone to do it, or will it become another chore for the volunteer admins?

With all those programming experts on board this must be a piece of cake to automate
that process!

Even some MOC-Shop coding could be re-used. That was the purpose of the platform
right? For Bricklink 2.0 or 2.1 or 3.0.... ah, you know what I mean, nudge, nudge,
wink, wink...

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jun 16, 2014 08:34

Subject:

Re: Fee deduction program

Viewed:

30 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, mabccc writes:

I voted no. For the simple reason that if you give discounts for inventories
and so on, then more people will grab them as soon as they can, possibly not
have the set anyway but copy the inventory based on lego's database or the
one imported into brickset or similar, or make errors because they have reserved
too many inventories for themself and need to rush through them to get their
discounts.

Than you must not vote no to this idea. Your NO is pointed at the incorrect additions
to the inventory. Only correct (checked, double checked, triple checked, whatever-ple
checked!) additions qualify for points. So that needs to be ruled out.
Errors in additions might also result in deduction of points.
Your vote changed?

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jun 16, 2014 07:47

Subject:

Re: Fee deduction program

Viewed:

42 times

Topic:

Interesting distinction between sellers and buyers, but ANY member can contribute.
So as a buyer doesn't have to pay BL fee's indeed, they might be up for
a generic store coupon on redeeming points. This coupon should be redeemable
at ANY store.
Nice addition

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jun 16, 2014 07:28

Subject:

Re: Fee deduction program

Viewed:

42 times

Topic:

I voted yes.

Thanks

I think a points system would work well, different weightings for different things
you do to the catalogue, points = money off your fee's.

Agreed, didn't work that out as there are many ways to do this. Indeed there
has to be a weight factor and time factor to earn points that you can redeem
as fee discounts or coupons at specific stores. Hey, that just sounds like
a membership programm!!

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jun 16, 2014 06:26

Subject:

Fee deduction program

Viewed:

317 times

Topic:

Status:

Discarded

As this is still a community build and moderated site, all efforts by members
to improve the site, listings, behaviour of members etc, should result in a discount
on fees to be paid.

Bricklink should have a program that rewards members who:
- catalog contributions
- image improvements
- price guide corrections
- listings corrections
- adding help files/video's/translations
- .....

At this day, only BAD behaviour is santioned (NSS, NPB's, site and forum
bans etc....). Let us not emphasize the negative behaviour but reward the positive
behaviour.

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

May 9, 2014 16:23

Subject:

Re: Link to All Admin Posts

Viewed:

42 times

Topic:

Smooth

YES!

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Apr 14, 2014 11:38

Subject:

Re: New Feedback Format

Viewed:

43 times

Topic:

This solution does not prevent tricks like BRicksters (see other posts for details)
has pulled of succesfully over a long period of time.
Apparently the rule is:

if you can't read the feedback right, we can't be bothered when are being
scammed, it's your own fault.

We as sellers and buyers do our best to help new members getting familiar here
at BL and at the same time, they are easy prey for scavengers.

The feedback system is fine, reading is required, decisions are made by individuals
to buy stuff. But the system that provides these bad sellers needs to be addressed
and changed. NOT the feedback system (at least: not for this reason...).

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Apr 13, 2014 12:09

Subject:

Re: I Have Removed Stoplist & Ignore Suggestion

Viewed:

69 times

Topic:

It takes a wise man to make this post. Not many people have the strength and
wisdom to do this. Nice to see one who has.
Thanks Ken.

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Apr 13, 2014 03:35

Subject:

Re: Make it easier to report suspicious members

Viewed:

26 times

Topic:

No: the member is not suspicious, its store or items or practices are.
Please do not label people when you want to label behaviour

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Apr 10, 2014 13:22

Subject:

Re: Remove MSRP Price

Viewed:

53 times

Topic:

Woeha!!!

Always better than Borg....

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Apr 10, 2014 13:20

Subject:

Re: Remove MSRP Price

Viewed:

55 times

Topic:

In fairness, it WAS suggested. Why they chose this suggestion, out of all of
them, to implement is beyond me though.

Missed that

Better text:

"When this set was released on 2010 the Manufacturers' Suggested Retail Price
was $99.99. Be advised that in the secondary market prices are determined by
supply and demand and may be significantly more than MSRP."

Yep, please add this to the implemented feature CS! Please?

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Apr 10, 2014 13:05

Subject:

Re: Remove MSRP Price

Viewed:

61 times

Topic:

Nicely put.
An explanation on the WHY this was added would be nice

I haven't got a clue from the point of sales that is.... As research facility,
it is a nice addition though.

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Apr 5, 2014 03:55

Subject:

Re: Clarify nature of the forum

Viewed:

54 times

Topic:

Well made point.
I recently hinted the CS to opening an update tab or something like that so
there is an OFFICIAL 'release/update/news' thread that doesn't fill
up the forum.
I'm PRO!

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Apr 2, 2014 03:30

Subject:

Re: Update policy on foriegn customs laws

Viewed:

44 times

Topic:

Ignorent readers will also not read the TOS, useless addition in my opinion.
You can't educate a potential buyer with a sharper TOS....

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Mar 21, 2014 04:50

Subject:

Re: Request for Forum Roundtable with Mr. Kim

Viewed:

47 times

Topic:

This is the hardest thing for so many people to do without feeling like they
are incompetent. But it is the best way to gain the confidence of your customer.
It's one of those things that most people think is backwards, ie "don't
admit you don't know something or they will think you are incompetent". This
is simply not true.

I feel saying 'I don't know' proof of pure selfknowledge. It is not
always regarded as such, but being aware of ones limitations is a very powerful
force.

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Mar 20, 2014 13:52

Subject:

Re: Request for Forum Roundtable with Mr. Kim

Viewed:

52 times

Topic:

Nicely put.
I vote YEAH!

With technologies available, a webinar or skype conference call can do the trick.
That saves a lot of time and money travelling

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Mar 15, 2014 13:48

Subject:

Re: Open BrickLink to Non-Member Buyers

Viewed:

54 times

Topic:

That would be a nice and neat tweak indeed.

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Mar 15, 2014 11:51

Subject:

Re: Open BrickLink to Non-Member Buyers

Viewed:

55 times

Topic:

Nice addition. But the optional part I don't get. That's like saying
you can buy as a non-member, but in fact you can't buy at certain stores.
I think it would be more powerful if the featurew is implemented BL-wide and
not at the choice of a seller.

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jan 6, 2014 15:16

Subject:

Re: 3 strikes you are out(dated)...

Viewed:

62 times

Topic:

Good one, I favor!

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Mar 14, 2012 10:25

Subject:

Re: Remove quantity from Wanted List after order

Viewed:

40 times

Topic:

me too: YES

I now place my wanted number in the remarks field and manually edit them after
I receive an order. Many minutes spent already on that

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Aug 23, 2011 02:25

Subject:

Re: BrickLink API

Viewed:

123 times

Topic:

What's wrong with the fun you can have when going through the top 10 sellers
manually in 10 different opened windows on your pc after the first search has
been done?

I can determine rather quickly what seller(s) are the best options for me (based
on fees, shipping costs, location, other stuff not on my wanted list but always
nice to acquire). Adding this feature into the storesoftware would spoil this....

It's not always necessary to automate manual processes. Keeps the mind working
too!

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jul 14, 2011 14:33

Subject:

Re: Blocked user? Block feedback too!

Viewed:

43 times

Topic:

Theoretically it seems a good idea but the buying privileges revoked concern
the possibility to place new orders and the retaliatory feedback concerns past
orders when the buyer had his privileges, then I am not agree.

Davide

I agree with you, and disagree with the proposed rule.

If the sale went through, feedback should be allowed.
Those who bother to read feedback usually can spot when the feedback is unjustified.

I am against some of the current removal of feedback that occurs.
I think feedback should be much harder to get removed than it now is.

To give feedback is easy, removal of feedback is easy.

Instead of focusing on a harder removal policy I think it is better to prevent
incorrect or unrelated feedback by removing the possibilty to do post them in
the first place. Prevention before correction. It also forces anyone to think
twice about the feedback the are about to give.
Anyone with revoked privileges did something that made them revoked. No need
to let the revokee do more damage to the community.

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jul 14, 2011 10:42

Subject:

Re: Blocked user? Block feedback too!

Viewed:

28 times

Topic:

In that case I would agree that any feedback should be removed (or blocked),
because it would be for a bogus order -- an order placed after the buyer had
their buying privileges revoked.

Can that be done? Buying after your rights have been revoked?
Maybe the solution is worse than the action, I'm not sure.
Anyway, there must be some sort of 'holding area' where disputes are handled
and in the meantime the disputers that are 'banned' must be kept away from doing
more harm. That's my intention anyway. Banning it from all the options of BL
sounds harse indeed.... Mmm, tricky.

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jul 14, 2011 09:00

Subject:

Re: Blocked user? Block feedback too!

Viewed:

27 times

Topic:

So let's assume that a user is blocked for being under age. An unscrupulous seller
decides to take advantage of this and not ship the paid order from this now-banned
buyer. Why do you feel that it is fair to community for the buyer not to be able
post appropriate feedback?

I certainly wouldn't want to deal with such a seller and would appreciate the
feedback.

Revoked privileges = there's something not completely right; therefor it acts
as a warning to sellers and buyers.
During this warning-period it is up to the revoked one to 'prove' the opposite.
And it is safe for the community to have it's overall posting rights revoked
as well.
Shipping to an already revoked buyer sounds like an intended act of fraud?
In Dutch you are 'te kwader trouw', meaning you are aware of the wrongfulness
of the act but you still act like it.

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jul 14, 2011 06:04

Subject:

Re: Blocked user? Block feedback too!

Viewed:

48 times

Topic:

Revoking privileges is an attempt to prevent repeating previous actions.
Seen as such, you still disagree?

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Jul 14, 2011 03:05

Subject:

Blocked user? Block feedback too!

Viewed:

268 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Vote:

[Yes|No]

When a user has its buying privileges revoked, it should automatically revoke
its feedback privileges. This in order to prevent retaliatory actions from buyer
and seller.
Please keep this place tidy

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Apr 22, 2011 09:34

Subject:

Re: Locked forum for ADULTS ONLY.

Viewed:

42 times

Topic:

BigBrickDaddy=FIRE COOK!

That's one cool cook

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Apr 22, 2011 08:50

Subject:

Re: Locked forum for ADULTS ONLY.

Viewed:

49 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, fosterbengoshi writes:

Clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap..... Bravo! Well said.

Remember the old saying, if you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen?
Well, moving the kitchen to another room won't make a difference.

Thor

Thank you (takes of his hat and takes a bow)

Maybe they cook different menu's in the other kitchen that taste better?

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Apr 22, 2011 03:55

Subject:

Re: Locked forum for ADULTS ONLY.

Viewed:

49 times

Topic:

Since you want to keep all the LEGO nerds in ONE PLACE.

And keeping people addicted to the Crack Site called Brick Link is paramount
to the stores sales.

Keeping people interested keeps them here vs. Ebay, Amazon, etc...

Just my suggestion.

I have been buying more off Brick Link since I am not spending much time here
doing inventory and posting.

Thank you for listening.

WOW, that is a ton of suggestions!

What's next: a TV-station, movies, advertising guru's, free goodies in cereal
?

Please leave it as it is, there's already enough S**T on the net these days.
I think my foul-language and explicit-image filters will prevent me from coming
to BrickLink if these kind of fora are to be coupled to this community of mostly
sane and decent people.

If I would like to take the piss on someone I'd prefer a face-2-face encounter.
Shouting on the net has been made to easy. 21-12-2012 the end of the world? As
the moral decay continues at this speed, we might not even get there and will
destroy ourselves before that date .....

BDD, you're famous for poking in a bee-hive, don't be surprised if you get stung
again (is that correct English?).

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Feb 16, 2011 08:10

Subject:

Re: Automatic removal of wanted list items

Viewed:

39 times

Topic:

In Suggestions, RUMRUNNER writes:

Basically this feature already exists but I do agree that for many it's hard
to see due to the small print and location on the screen.

I vote yes to having it much more visible and user friendly.

Rumrunner.

Please fill me in on this one.... can't seem to find it.
O, nevertheless, it's a YES!!!! (please?)

StarBrick

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Oct 14, 2010 15:04

Subject:

Re: suggestion. Different use of stockroom option

Viewed:

35 times

Topic: