Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | MOC_Brick_Steve  | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 08:46 | | Subject: | Merge Want Lists OR Easy Buy on Multiple List | | Viewed: | 40 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| I was recently purchasing parts for two different builds that were in different
want lists.
I discovered you can only easy buy for a single wantlist at a time which meant
losing a lot of the efficiency of a single order, and because some of the orders
were small meant not qualifying for the minimum order, even though the combined
total of the wantlists was sufficient.
I subsequently merged the XML files by writing a Python script and reported it
as a new want list. This would be much easier if it were an internal feature.
Preferably I would select distinct want lists and easy buy would merge on the
back end so that I can maintain the sorting of the part lists, but it would be
acceptable to have a "merge want lists" feature internally.
This tool needs to resolve the very common situation that there will be duplicate
parts between lists being merged. Ideally it would use the merged total for calculations
but have a drop down showing the two required amounts from the premerged sources.
The former is simple the latter a little more difficult since the XML format
doesn't have a tag that would allow this.
Thank you.
|
 |
| Author: | MOC_Brick_Steve | | Posted: | Apr 20, 2024 08:39 | | Subject: | Search "Alternate Item Number" when importing | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| Hello,
This morning I was importing an XML file with the attached results. In every
case, removing the letter from the part number correctly resolved the issue,
but I noticed while confirming the parts that for each of these parts the site
has recorded the below numbers as "alternate item numbers".
My suggestion is that the import utility also search the alternate numbers when
attempting to import, and update the Wanted List with the most appropriate current
number. This should probably generate an import warning message but should allow
the import to proceed.
Thank you
The following items in the XML file are invalid or do not exist in the Bricklink
Catalog.
Please fix the following errors:
Item No: 3068b
Item No: 3068b
Item No: 3068b
Item No: 3069b
Item No: 3069b
Item No: 3069b
Item No: 3069b
Item No: 3070b
Item No: 3070b
Item No: 3070b
Item No: 44302a
Item No: 553b
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Apr 19, 2024 11:14 | | Subject: | Re: Spam | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
| | Circling back to: https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=145974
Seems to me anyway, that simply restricting zero feedback members the use of
links in the forum, would immediately eliminate most current spam posts and deter
future ones. Haven’t been looking that close at these posts, but from what I’ve
seen, it’s presenting links they have as a common purpose or motivation. Removing
motivation is often a subtle yet effective tack in life.
Could be that it’s not all that simple, technically to implement. I don’t know,
but if doable, why not? Personally don't find the spam posts all that bothersome.
Many do though, and if there's an easy fix to tidy things up a bit...
-popsicle
|
The spam posts tend to get removed really quite fast, at least at the times of
day when I see them (and report them). Links only work if people click on them.
If nobody clicks on them then there is no motivation to post more. Yet still
they post and post.
|
|
| Author: | popsicle | | Posted: | Apr 19, 2024 09:42 | | Subject: | Re: Spam | | Viewed: | 51 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, v100Bricks writes:
| | Would seem to be harsh on new users that may need genuine help. Especially considering
the delays with the help desk just now.
|
Considered that and why focusing on link restriction only. Don't think new
users need to post links to get the help needed
|
| Author: | v100Bricks | | Posted: | Apr 19, 2024 09:36 | | Subject: | Re: Spam | | Viewed: | 42 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| Would seem to be harsh on new users that may need genuine help. Especially considering
the delays with the help desk just now.
|
|
| Author: | popsicle | | Posted: | Apr 19, 2024 09:28 | | Subject: | Spam | | Viewed: | 202 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| Circling back to: https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=145974
Seems to me anyway, that simply restricting zero feedback members the use of
links in the forum, would immediately eliminate most current spam posts and deter
future ones. Haven’t been looking that close at these posts, but from what I’ve
seen, it’s presenting links they have as a common purpose or motivation. Removing
motivation is often a subtle yet effective tack in life.
Could be that it’s not all that simple, technically to implement. I don’t know,
but if doable, why not? Personally don't find the spam posts all that bothersome.
Many do though, and if there's an easy fix to tidy things up a bit...
-popsicle
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Apr 18, 2024 10:52 | | Subject: | Re: add LEGO PaB website to stores | | Viewed: | 54 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Ra writes:
| | In Suggestions, yorbrick writes:
| | | | Not to mention that stores on BL can not have more than one physical location
from which they ship from.
|
That is for regular people and companies. I'm sure they could find a way
round if they wanted to do it. Such as having three different LEGO BL stores,
one for standard parts, one for bestsellers Europe and one for bestsellers North
America, or however many locations they ship from.
But it would still go back on what they said originally, and I think would damage
new parts sales from regular sellers who would then shift their stores completely
to brickowl. Moving both used and new parts sellers, moving customers and losing
BL fees.
|
We don't know how lucrative PaB is, but I am sure it isn't just for the
benefit of lego enthusiasts. If TLG were to capture more actual sales then just
fees, I am sure they would be making more money then just fees alone. So if a
brick only costs a few cents to manufacture and they can capture the same profit
as PaB that will be more than 3-2% of what a part sells for on here.
Example:
PaB part cost to manufacture, 5 cents, sells for 10 cents that is 5 cent profit.
Where a seller sells that part at 10 cents TLG makes 2 cents (from a major seller).
Sure you can say but TLG has overhead, where? They are already manufacturing,
storing, sorting for sets and PaB so no additional overhead.
TLG has a global foot print, way more than any seller has on here along with
better shipping rate options.
|
Sure they could try to capture more of the market for inividual new parts, but
at what long term cost? They cannot keep up with PAB standard as it is. PAB best
seller is OK for speed but that s relatively small inventory.
If they aim to kill small businesses selling on bricklink then there is little
point in owning bricklink. Longer term,it would be worse for sellers and buyers.
|
|
| Author: | Ra | | Posted: | Apr 18, 2024 09:10 | | Subject: | Re: add LEGO PaB website to stores | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, yorbrick writes:
| | | | Not to mention that stores on BL can not have more than one physical location
from which they ship from.
|
That is for regular people and companies. I'm sure they could find a way
round if they wanted to do it. Such as having three different LEGO BL stores,
one for standard parts, one for bestsellers Europe and one for bestsellers North
America, or however many locations they ship from.
But it would still go back on what they said originally, and I think would damage
new parts sales from regular sellers who would then shift their stores completely
to brickowl. Moving both used and new parts sellers, moving customers and losing
BL fees.
|
We don't know how lucrative PaB is, but I am sure it isn't just for the
benefit of lego enthusiasts. If TLG were to capture more actual sales then just
fees, I am sure they would be making more money then just fees alone. So if a
brick only costs a few cents to manufacture and they can capture the same profit
as PaB that will be more than 3-2% of what a part sells for on here.
Example:
PaB part cost to manufacture, 5 cents, sells for 10 cents that is 5 cent profit.
Where a seller sells that part at 10 cents TLG makes 2 cents (from a major seller).
Sure you can say but TLG has overhead, where? They are already manufacturing,
storing, sorting for sets and PaB so no additional overhead.
TLG has a global foot print, way more than any seller has on here along with
better shipping rate options.
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Apr 18, 2024 07:45 | | Subject: | Re: add LEGO PaB website to stores | | Viewed: | 58 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| | | Not to mention that stores on BL can not have more than one physical location
from which they ship from.
|
That is for regular people and companies. I'm sure they could find a way
round if they wanted to do it. Such as having three different LEGO BL stores,
one for standard parts, one for bestsellers Europe and one for bestsellers North
America, or however many locations they ship from.
But it would still go back on what they said originally, and I think would damage
new parts sales from regular sellers who would then shift their stores completely
to brickowl. Moving both used and new parts sellers, moving customers and losing
BL fees.
|
|
| Author: | Ziegelmeister | | Posted: | Apr 18, 2024 05:36 | | Subject: | Re: add LEGO PaB website to stores | | Viewed: | 50 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, nbbhav writes:
| | In Suggestions, ej76az writes:
| | Why would LEGO care whether any third-party stores (i.e. competitors of LEGO's
PaB website) close down?
|
It would create an interesting marketing problem for LEGO. If you've not
read LEGO's Fair Play statement, it's worth reading it:
https://www.lego.com/en-gb/legal/notices-and-policies/fair-play/
I'm not a lawyer, but would it be considered unfair competition if PaB was
added into BrickLink?
I think LEGO has more opportunities promoting BrickLink longer term for both
New and Used pieces. I've had problems in orders from PaB which weren't
ideal for me, but from the LEGO perspective this is additional cost they have
to manage.
For Used pieces, promoting their support for BrickLink helps in environmental
sustainability through recycling of used bricks.
|
Not to mention that stores on BL can not have more than one physical location
from which they ship from.
|
|
| Author: | nbbhav | | Posted: | Apr 18, 2024 05:15 | | Subject: | Re: add LEGO PaB website to stores | | Viewed: | 46 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, ej76az writes:
| | Why would LEGO care whether any third-party stores (i.e. competitors of LEGO's
PaB website) close down?
|
It would create an interesting marketing problem for LEGO. If you've not
read LEGO's Fair Play statement, it's worth reading it:
https://www.lego.com/en-gb/legal/notices-and-policies/fair-play/
I'm not a lawyer, but would it be considered unfair competition if PaB was
added into BrickLink?
I think LEGO has more opportunities promoting BrickLink longer term for both
New and Used pieces. I've had problems in orders from PaB which weren't
ideal for me, but from the LEGO perspective this is additional cost they have
to manage.
For Used pieces, promoting their support for BrickLink helps in environmental
sustainability through recycling of used bricks.
|
|
| Author: | Stellar | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 11:17 | | Subject: | Re: add LEGO PaB website to stores | | Viewed: | 61 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, jennnifer writes:
| | In Suggestions, ej76az writes:
| | When clicking Buy All on a Wanted List and then clicking Auto-Select, only third-party
stores are listed. The price of a part is often (but not always) cheaper from
LEGO's PaB website than from any third-party store. Also, PaB shipping is
free if the order is at least $35, whereas shipping costs can really add up when
buying from third-party stores. LEGO has owned BL for almost half a decade.
Why is LEGO's PaB website not included among the stores on BL?
(I tried to search for this suggestion in the Forum but didn't find anything)
|
Anyone have the data on what percentage of parts/colors/patterns available on
BrickLink is on the current PAB menu?
|
They now have 15087 lots for sale, but only 14694 in stock. Bestsellers in stock
are 4180 lots.
| |
Also, I think the prices would become much higher if LEGO had to pay enough people
to ship every order as quickly and accurately as a good BL shop does.
~Jen
|
|
|
| Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 10:45 | | Subject: | Re: add LEGO PaB website to stores | | Viewed: | 61 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, ej76az writes:
| | When clicking Buy All on a Wanted List and then clicking Auto-Select, only third-party
stores are listed. The price of a part is often (but not always) cheaper from
LEGO's PaB website than from any third-party store. Also, PaB shipping is
free if the order is at least $35, whereas shipping costs can really add up when
buying from third-party stores. LEGO has owned BL for almost half a decade.
Why is LEGO's PaB website not included among the stores on BL?
(I tried to search for this suggestion in the Forum but didn't find anything)
|
Anyone have the data on what percentage of parts/colors/patterns available on
BrickLink is on the current PAB menu?
Also, I think the prices would become much higher if LEGO had to pay enough people
to ship every order as quickly and accurately as a good BL shop does.
~Jen
|
|
| Author: | peregrinator | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 07:16 | | Subject: | Re: add LEGO PaB website to stores | | Viewed: | 71 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, ej76az writes:
| | When clicking Buy All on a Wanted List and then clicking Auto-Select, only third-party
stores are listed. The price of a part is often (but not always) cheaper from
LEGO's PaB website than from any third-party store. Also, PaB shipping is
free if the order is at least $35, whereas shipping costs can really add up when
buying from third-party stores. LEGO has owned BL for almost half a decade.
Why is LEGO's PaB website not included among the stores on BL?
(I tried to search for this suggestion in the Forum but didn't find anything)
|
In my experience, it's rare that PaB is actually cheaper - if it were I'd
definitely be buying parts there and selling them here.
|
|
| Author: | Ziegelmeister | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 02:59 | | Subject: | Re: add LEGO PaB website to stores | | Viewed: | 51 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, ej76az writes:
| | Why would LEGO care whether any third-party stores (i.e. competitors of LEGO's
PaB website) close down?
|
Because that would directly impact their own sales. Myself and many others focus
solely on new sets and new set part outs, buying multiple copies of high dollar
sets. How many $200, $400, $600+ sets do regular consumers (or BL buyers without
a store) buy per year, and how many do small rinky dink stores like me - or
extremely large stores not like me - buy per month? I'd argue that an enthusiastic
3PS is worth a minimum - minimum - of 40 run of the mill consumers.
| | Also, third-party stores would still be indispensable, because there are so many
parts that are unavailable from the PaB website.
|
Indispensable and profitable are two different things. Plus how many people
place an order for 50 lots of discontinued parts? Think of at least five of
unavailable parts you're trying to find and go look at the sales history
of it. At best it's current for sale average is probably a couple of bucks
and at least three of those probably have an outlier that's ~50% below the
average. From the sounds of it, you're going to buy from the cheapest store,
and they made "a coupl'a bucks". That's not running a business,
that's running a charity without the benefits of 501c status.
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 02:05 | | Subject: | Re: add LEGO PaB website to stores | | Viewed: | 53 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| | |
Why would LEGO care whether any third-party stores (i.e. competitors of LEGO's
PaB website) close down?
Also, third-party stores would still be indispensable, because there are so many
parts that are unavailable from the PaB website.
|
When taking over bricklink, LEGO claimed they wouldn't interfere with the
marketplace, implying they wouldn't compete with sellers. If they want to
compete with sellers, then many sellers will leave and move to the independent
marketplace.
They would also need to behave like other BL sellers. I'd leave them negative
feedback unless they improved their order turn around times.
|
|
| Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 00:09 | | Subject: | Re: add LEGO PaB website to stores | | Viewed: | 48 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, rtzx9r writes:
| | In Suggestions, ej76az writes:
| | In Suggestions, UTLF writes:
| | | | Why would LEGO care whether any third-party stores (i.e. competitors of LEGO's
PaB website) close down?
Also, third-party stores would still be indispensable, because there are so many
parts that are unavailable from the PaB website.
|
Lego owns Bricklink, and Bricklink is strictly third-party sellers; the site
would die and Lego would lose money on their investment & whatnot
If you want to source parts from PAB and Bricklink, use BrickHunter, a Chrome
extension that lets you upload a wanted list & auto-selects parts from PAB and
shows what you would need to get from Bricklink if parts are unavailable or retired
|
Yes, BH is amazing, and I often use it. But it adds another layer of complexity
and another step in the process.
|
Ever order from PAB? Enjoy your bricks 2-3 months later.
|
For standard bricks but yah it’s crazy.
|
|
| Author: | rtzx9r | | Posted: | Apr 17, 2024 00:00 | | Subject: | Re: add LEGO PaB website to stores | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, ej76az writes:
| | In Suggestions, UTLF writes:
| | | | Why would LEGO care whether any third-party stores (i.e. competitors of LEGO's
PaB website) close down?
Also, third-party stores would still be indispensable, because there are so many
parts that are unavailable from the PaB website.
|
Lego owns Bricklink, and Bricklink is strictly third-party sellers; the site
would die and Lego would lose money on their investment & whatnot
If you want to source parts from PAB and Bricklink, use BrickHunter, a Chrome
extension that lets you upload a wanted list & auto-selects parts from PAB and
shows what you would need to get from Bricklink if parts are unavailable or retired
|
Yes, BH is amazing, and I often use it. But it adds another layer of complexity
and another step in the process.
|
Ever order from PAB? Enjoy your bricks 2-3 months later.
|
|
| Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Apr 16, 2024 23:52 | | Subject: | Re: add LEGO PaB website to stores | | Viewed: | 46 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, ej76az writes:
| | In Suggestions, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Suggestions, ej76az writes:
| | In Suggestions, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Suggestions, ej76az writes:
| | When clicking Buy All on a Wanted List and then clicking Auto-Select, only third-party
stores are listed. The price of a part is often (but not always) cheaper from
LEGO's PaB website than from any third-party store. Also, PaB shipping is
free if the order is at least $35, whereas shipping costs can really add up when
buying from third-party stores. LEGO has owned BL for almost half a decade.
Why is LEGO's PaB website not included among the stores on BL?
(I tried to search for this suggestion in the Forum but didn't find anything)
|
since bricklink is specifically for 3rd party sellers, not lego themselves. if
lego came over to bricklink and started ramping up then most stores on bricklink
would have to close down as they cant compete with lego if they are on the same
site which would then just end up making bricklink a reskinned PAB.
|
cool pizza flag
|
pizza!
| | Why would LEGO care whether any third-party stores (i.e. competitors of LEGO's
PaB website) close down?
|
since they make up a good chunk of Lego's revenue. 3rd party sellers buy
from lego and then do lots of work which if lego themselves did and paid employees
minimum wage they probably couldn't make it profitable so with the current
setup all parties involved benefit. Also it seems lego is pursuing this route
as there have been surveys from lego and bricklink trying to improve the lego-reseller
connection.
| | Also, third-party stores would still be indispensable, because there are so many
parts that are unavailable from the PaB website.
|
To a point but if lego started selling lots on bricklink then a good chunk of
sales would move to them and then the stores that could offer said parts would
have most of their stock not moving since lego takes that and then they probably
wouldn't bother with selling the few parts that lego doesn't sell as
sales would be significantly lower and make it not profitable for many
|
pardon my ignorance (I'm an AFOL newbie), but could you explain this a little?
what work?
|
Listing and pulling orders is usually extremely work intensive in comparison
to profit.
|
|
| Author: | ej76az | | Posted: | Apr 16, 2024 23:40 | | Subject: | Re: add LEGO PaB website to stores | | Viewed: | 49 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Suggestions, ej76az writes:
| | In Suggestions, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Suggestions, ej76az writes:
| | When clicking Buy All on a Wanted List and then clicking Auto-Select, only third-party
stores are listed. The price of a part is often (but not always) cheaper from
LEGO's PaB website than from any third-party store. Also, PaB shipping is
free if the order is at least $35, whereas shipping costs can really add up when
buying from third-party stores. LEGO has owned BL for almost half a decade.
Why is LEGO's PaB website not included among the stores on BL?
(I tried to search for this suggestion in the Forum but didn't find anything)
|
since bricklink is specifically for 3rd party sellers, not lego themselves. if
lego came over to bricklink and started ramping up then most stores on bricklink
would have to close down as they cant compete with lego if they are on the same
site which would then just end up making bricklink a reskinned PAB.
|
cool pizza flag
|
pizza!
| | Why would LEGO care whether any third-party stores (i.e. competitors of LEGO's
PaB website) close down?
|
since they make up a good chunk of Lego's revenue. 3rd party sellers buy
from lego and then do lots of work which if lego themselves did and paid employees
minimum wage they probably couldn't make it profitable so with the current
setup all parties involved benefit. Also it seems lego is pursuing this route
as there have been surveys from lego and bricklink trying to improve the lego-reseller
connection.
| | Also, third-party stores would still be indispensable, because there are so many
parts that are unavailable from the PaB website.
|
To a point but if lego started selling lots on bricklink then a good chunk of
sales would move to them and then the stores that could offer said parts would
have most of their stock not moving since lego takes that and then they probably
wouldn't bother with selling the few parts that lego doesn't sell as
sales would be significantly lower and make it not profitable for many
|
pardon my ignorance (I'm an AFOL newbie), but could you explain this a little?
what work?
| | 3rd party sellers... do lots of work which if lego themselves did and paid employees
|
|
|
| Author: | ej76az | | Posted: | Apr 16, 2024 23:33 | | Subject: | Re: add LEGO PaB website to stores | | Viewed: | 56 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, UTLF writes:
| | | | Why would LEGO care whether any third-party stores (i.e. competitors of LEGO's
PaB website) close down?
Also, third-party stores would still be indispensable, because there are so many
parts that are unavailable from the PaB website.
|
Lego owns Bricklink, and Bricklink is strictly third-party sellers; the site
would die and Lego would lose money on their investment & whatnot
If you want to source parts from PAB and Bricklink, use BrickHunter, a Chrome
extension that lets you upload a wanted list & auto-selects parts from PAB and
shows what you would need to get from Bricklink if parts are unavailable or retired
|
Yes, BH is amazing, and I often use it. But it adds another layer of complexity
and another step in the process.
|
|
| Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Apr 16, 2024 22:54 | | Subject: | Re: add LEGO PaB website to stores | | Viewed: | 57 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, ej76az writes:
| | In Suggestions, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Suggestions, ej76az writes:
| | When clicking Buy All on a Wanted List and then clicking Auto-Select, only third-party
stores are listed. The price of a part is often (but not always) cheaper from
LEGO's PaB website than from any third-party store. Also, PaB shipping is
free if the order is at least $35, whereas shipping costs can really add up when
buying from third-party stores. LEGO has owned BL for almost half a decade.
Why is LEGO's PaB website not included among the stores on BL?
(I tried to search for this suggestion in the Forum but didn't find anything)
|
since bricklink is specifically for 3rd party sellers, not lego themselves. if
lego came over to bricklink and started ramping up then most stores on bricklink
would have to close down as they cant compete with lego if they are on the same
site which would then just end up making bricklink a reskinned PAB.
|
cool pizza flag
|
pizza!
| | Why would LEGO care whether any third-party stores (i.e. competitors of LEGO's
PaB website) close down?
|
since they make up a good chunk of Lego's revenue. 3rd party sellers buy
from lego and then do lots of work which if lego themselves did and paid employees
minimum wage they probably couldn't make it profitable so with the current
setup all parties involved benefit. Also it seems lego is pursuing this route
as there have been surveys from lego and bricklink trying to improve the lego-reseller
connection.
| | Also, third-party stores would still be indispensable, because there are so many
parts that are unavailable from the PaB website.
|
To a point but if lego started selling lots on bricklink then a good chunk of
sales would move to them and then the stores that could offer said parts would
have most of their stock not moving since lego takes that and then they probably
wouldn't bother with selling the few parts that lego doesn't sell as
sales would be significantly lower and make it not profitable for many
|
|
| Author: | ej76az | | Posted: | Apr 16, 2024 22:48 | | Subject: | Re: add LEGO PaB website to stores | | Viewed: | 68 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Nubs_Select writes:
| | In Suggestions, ej76az writes:
| | When clicking Buy All on a Wanted List and then clicking Auto-Select, only third-party
stores are listed. The price of a part is often (but not always) cheaper from
LEGO's PaB website than from any third-party store. Also, PaB shipping is
free if the order is at least $35, whereas shipping costs can really add up when
buying from third-party stores. LEGO has owned BL for almost half a decade.
Why is LEGO's PaB website not included among the stores on BL?
(I tried to search for this suggestion in the Forum but didn't find anything)
|
since bricklink is specifically for 3rd party sellers, not lego themselves. if
lego came over to bricklink and started ramping up then most stores on bricklink
would have to close down as they cant compete with lego if they are on the same
site which would then just end up making bricklink a reskinned PAB.
|
cool pizza flag
Why would LEGO care whether any third-party stores (i.e. competitors of LEGO's
PaB website) close down?
Also, third-party stores would still be indispensable, because there are so many
parts that are unavailable from the PaB website.
|
|
| Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Apr 16, 2024 22:42 | | Subject: | Re: add LEGO PaB website to stores | | Viewed: | 62 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, ej76az writes:
| | When clicking Buy All on a Wanted List and then clicking Auto-Select, only third-party
stores are listed. The price of a part is often (but not always) cheaper from
LEGO's PaB website than from any third-party store. Also, PaB shipping is
free if the order is at least $35, whereas shipping costs can really add up when
buying from third-party stores. LEGO has owned BL for almost half a decade.
Why is LEGO's PaB website not included among the stores on BL?
(I tried to search for this suggestion in the Forum but didn't find anything)
|
since bricklink is specifically for 3rd party sellers, not lego themselves. if
lego came over to bricklink and started ramping up then most stores on bricklink
would have to close down as they cant compete with lego if they are on the same
site which would then just end up making bricklink a reskinned PAB.
|
|
| Author: | ej76az | | Posted: | Apr 16, 2024 22:35 | | Subject: | add LEGO PaB website to stores | | Viewed: | 191 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| When clicking Buy All on a Wanted List and then clicking Auto-Select, only third-party
stores are listed. The price of a part is often (but not always) cheaper from
LEGO's PaB website than from any third-party store. Also, PaB shipping is
free if the order is at least $35, whereas shipping costs can really add up when
buying from third-party stores. LEGO has owned BL for almost half a decade.
Why is LEGO's PaB website not included among the stores on BL?
(I tried to search for this suggestion in the Forum but didn't find anything)
|
|
| Author: | Hal8472 | | Posted: | Apr 8, 2024 14:17 | | Subject: | Re: New filter based on % off | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, TheHatter13 writes:
| | I have seen a lot of sellers offer multiple different discounts. It would be
nice to have a filter that you can choose the discounts you want to see instead
of just all sales. Like if a shop has different sale percentages at 10, 25, 30,
50 and 75 percent off you could filter for everything above 50%.
|
This is a comparison to a created number. There are no sales on bricklink.
Just different prices.
|
|
| Author: | infinibrix | | Posted: | Apr 6, 2024 11:49 | | Subject: | Re: Setting Orders to Complete! | | Viewed: | 52 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Suggestions, infinibrix writes:
| | […]
| | I've definitely had buyers leave feedback before they even received their
orders - rare, but it happens.
|
Yes but this example just illustrates someone not using the system properly and
I'm pretty sure we don't require a system built around a one off user
not using the system correctly?
|
A system shouldn’t allow its users to use it incorrectly.
(That includes sellers marking orders complete  )
|
And your point? Removing the Completed option would solve this issue at the same
time?
Besides which as a Seller I have never marked an order as Complete! Once I mark
the order status as 'Shipped' I then leave the customer alone to change
the status from there on in
| | “You’re holding wrong” is a registred trademark. BrickLink is too cheap to use
it.
|
??
|
|
| Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Apr 6, 2024 11:19 | | Subject: | Re: Setting Orders to Complete! | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, infinibrix writes:
| | […]
| | I've definitely had buyers leave feedback before they even received their
orders - rare, but it happens.
|
Yes but this example just illustrates someone not using the system properly and
I'm pretty sure we don't require a system built around a one off user
not using the system correctly?
|
A system shouldn’t allow its users to use it incorrectly.
(That includes sellers marking orders complete )
“You’re holding wrong” is a registred trademark. BrickLink is too cheap to use
it.
| | I can imagine the feedback they left was interesting....
"Great Seller, Order is on its way and it will arrive in good time and be
absolutely perfect!"
|
Have you read the feedback left on other plateforms? It’s sometimes worse than
that.
|
|
| Author: | infinibrix | | Posted: | Apr 6, 2024 10:53 | | Subject: | Re: Setting Orders to Complete! | | Viewed: | 27 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, peregrinator writes:
| | In Suggestions, infinibrix writes:
| | I cannot think of a single situation where a buyer would leave feedback if they
didn't consider the order completed? Presumably they leave feedback when
they've either received goods and are happy (Order Completed) or they leave
negative/neutral feedback because they are unhappy with the sellers lack of resolve
(Order Completed)
On other platforms like ebay there is no Completed status because feedback alone
defines the orders status and rounds up the overall transaction as complete!
|
I've definitely had buyers leave feedback before they even received their
orders - rare, but it happens.
|
Yes but this example just illustrates someone not using the system properly and
I'm pretty sure we don't require a system built around a one off user
not using the system correctly?
I can imagine the feedback they left was interesting....
"Great Seller, Order is on its way and it will arrive in good time and be
absolutely perfect!"
| | I don't know if one can do the same on eBay
(it seems one can click the "Leave Feedback" button but I don't know
if the form can be submitted), but in any case, since eBay also tracks orders,
I imagine the order isn't complete until the buyer has received it (I don't
know what happens in cases where the order can't be tracked).
I think if the buyer marks the order as "Received" and then leaves positive
feedback the order should automatically complete. Maybe when the buyer leaves
any kind of feedback? Not sure about that last part.
|
The way I see it the very final option in the dropdown should be 'Received'
with no need for a 'Completed' option. The buyer essentially completes
their order by leaving feedback!
i.e they mark as received and then leave feedback once they are happy with their
order or if they are unhappy with their order they mark as received, message
seller for a resolution, wait for issue to be resolved(or not resolved) and then
leave appropriate feedback. By leaving feedback the buyer is finished with that
order and it is essentially complete
|
|
| Author: | peregrinator | | Posted: | Apr 6, 2024 06:43 | | Subject: | Re: Setting Orders to Complete! | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, infinibrix writes:
| | I cannot think of a single situation where a buyer would leave feedback if they
didn't consider the order completed? Presumably they leave feedback when
they've either received goods and are happy (Order Completed) or they leave
negative/neutral feedback because they are unhappy with the sellers lack of resolve
(Order Completed)
On other platforms like ebay there is no Completed status because feedback alone
defines the orders status and rounds up the overall transaction as complete!
|
I've definitely had buyers leave feedback before they even received their
orders - rare, but it happens. I don't know if one can do the same on eBay
(it seems one can click the "Leave Feedback" button but I don't know
if the form can be submitted), but in any case, since eBay also tracks orders,
I imagine the order isn't complete until the buyer has received it (I don't
know what happens in cases where the order can't be tracked).
I think if the buyer marks the order as "Received" and then leaves positive
feedback the order should automatically complete. Maybe when the buyer leaves
any kind of feedback? Not sure about that last part.
|
|
| Author: | infinibrix | | Posted: | Apr 6, 2024 06:30 | | Subject: | Re: Setting Orders to Complete! | | Viewed: | 37 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, 1001bricks writes:
| | In Suggestions, infinibrix writes:
| | In Suggestions, 1001bricks writes:
| | In Suggestions, infinibrix writes:
| | In Suggestions, 1001bricks writes:
| | In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
| | In Suggestions, infinibrix writes:
|
|
| | | | | | As a side note I wonder whether status should auto set to complete once buyer
has left feedback or certainly after both buyer and seller have left feedback
|
Sensible. Put it forward as a Suggestion post, I say.
|
Abolutely not please.
Buyer also can be too kind and post immediately a positive feedback when having
paid, or even before!
This would close the order as "Completed" while it wasn't meant 
|
If the buyer has left feedback prior to item being received/shipped then that
would be a bit silly and they are in no better position regardless of whether
the order has been completed or not!
|
See Help page of definition of Status Completed.
A positive feedback doesn't mean the order is completed.
|
It doesn't mean your original statement makes any more sense either?
|
Kind of, re-read "while it wasn't meant" as "while it could haven't
been meant".
But who cares, the fact is there's no / not always relationship between feedback
and status.
I mean apart if everything's rewritten, like status, feedbacks, alerts...
But as of right now, a quick and easy way to straighten things would be to:
* redefine the Completed status in Help,
* or make seller not able to set the order to Completed.
Right now we're discussing in vain because it's one of the points where
BrickLink doesn't work or can't be used as described
I'm off this subject, sorry.
|
That's okay I can round-up things then....
Basically a buyer doesn't leave feedback until they consider the order completed
thereby making the status of 'Completed' obsolete
I cannot think of a single situation where a buyer would leave feedback if they
didn't consider the order completed? Presumably they leave feedback when
they've either received goods and are happy (Order Completed) or they leave
negative/neutral feedback because they are unhappy with the sellers lack of resolve
(Order Completed)
On other platforms like ebay there is no Completed status because feedback alone
defines the orders status and rounds up the overall transaction as complete!
|
|
| Author: | 1001bricks | | Posted: | Apr 5, 2024 21:10 | | Subject: | Re: Setting Orders to Complete! | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, infinibrix writes:
| | In Suggestions, 1001bricks writes:
| | In Suggestions, infinibrix writes:
| | In Suggestions, 1001bricks writes:
| | In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
| | In Suggestions, infinibrix writes:
|
|
| | | | | | As a side note I wonder whether status should auto set to complete once buyer
has left feedback or certainly after both buyer and seller have left feedback
|
Sensible. Put it forward as a Suggestion post, I say.
|
Abolutely not please.
Buyer also can be too kind and post immediately a positive feedback when having
paid, or even before!
This would close the order as "Completed" while it wasn't meant
|
If the buyer has left feedback prior to item being received/shipped then that
would be a bit silly and they are in no better position regardless of whether
the order has been completed or not!
|
See Help page of definition of Status Completed.
A positive feedback doesn't mean the order is completed.
|
It doesn't mean your original statement makes any more sense either?
|
Kind of, re-read "while it wasn't meant" as "while it could haven't
been meant".
But who cares, the fact is there's no / not always relationship between feedback
and status.
I mean apart if everything's rewritten, like status, feedbacks, alerts...
But as of right now, a quick and easy way to straighten things would be to:
* redefine the Completed status in Help,
* or make seller not able to set the order to Completed.
Right now we're discussing in vain because it's one of the points where
BrickLink doesn't work or can't be used as described
I'm off this subject, sorry.
|
|
| Author: | infinibrix | | Posted: | Apr 5, 2024 20:48 | | Subject: | Re: Setting Orders to Complete! | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, 1001bricks writes:
| | In Suggestions, infinibrix writes:
| | In Suggestions, 1001bricks writes:
| | In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
| | In Suggestions, infinibrix writes:
|
|
| | | | | | As a side note I wonder whether status should auto set to complete once buyer
has left feedback or certainly after both buyer and seller have left feedback
|
Sensible. Put it forward as a Suggestion post, I say.
|
Abolutely not please.
Buyer also can be too kind and post immediately a positive feedback when having
paid, or even before!
This would close the order as "Completed" while it wasn't meant
|
If the buyer has left feedback prior to item being received/shipped then that
would be a bit silly and they are in no better position regardless of whether
the order has been completed or not!
|
See Help page of definition of Status Completed.
A positive feedback doesn't mean the order is completed.
|
It doesn't mean your original statement makes any more sense either?
|
|
| Author: | 1001bricks | | Posted: | Apr 5, 2024 20:16 | | Subject: | Re: Setting Orders to Complete! | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, infinibrix writes:
| | In Suggestions, 1001bricks writes:
| | In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
| | In Suggestions, infinibrix writes:
|
|
| | | | | | As a side note I wonder whether status should auto set to complete once buyer
has left feedback or certainly after both buyer and seller have left feedback
|
Sensible. Put it forward as a Suggestion post, I say.
|
Abolutely not please.
Buyer also can be too kind and post immediately a positive feedback when having
paid, or even before!
This would close the order as "Completed" while it wasn't meant
|
If the buyer has left feedback prior to item being received/shipped then that
would be a bit silly and they are in no better position regardless of whether
the order has been completed or not!
|
See Help page of definition of Status Completed.
A positive feedback doesn't mean the order is completed.
| | I've come to the conclusion that you are the type of person who just likes
to disagree for the sake of disagreeing only your counter arguments rarely ever
seem to have any substance or make any sense?
|
Mom told me not to talk to trolls. Should have listen to her more.
|
|
| Author: | infinibrix | | Posted: | Apr 5, 2024 19:44 | | Subject: | Re: Setting Orders to Complete! | | Viewed: | 35 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, 1001bricks writes:
| | In Suggestions, popsicle writes:
| | In Suggestions, infinibrix writes:
|
|
| | | | | | As a side note I wonder whether status should auto set to complete once buyer
has left feedback or certainly after both buyer and seller have left feedback
|
Sensible. Put it forward as a Suggestion post, I say.
|
Abolutely not please.
Buyer also can be too kind and post immediately a positive feedback when having
paid, or even before!
This would close the order as "Completed" while it wasn't meant
|
If the buyer has left feedback prior to item being received/shipped then that
would be a bit silly and they are in no better position regardless of whether
the order has been completed or not!
I've come to the conclusion that you are the type of person who just likes
to disagree for the sake of disagreeing only your counter arguments rarely ever
seem to have any substance or make any sense?
|
|
| Author: | 1001bricks | | Posted: | Apr 5, 2024 15:22 | | Subject: | Re: Setting Orders to Complete! | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, yorbrick writes:
| | | | | |
There is a reason sellers might want to set an order to complete.
If you want to delete an old shipping method, you cannot if there is an open
order using that method
|
There's also NO reason to immediately delete a shipping method.
Simply disable it and forget it, delete it later on - it won't be shown in
your shop while disabled.
In short, there is still no reason a seller would set Completed an order 
|
Sure there are work arounds to solve a problem. But if a seller wants to remove
a method, they cannot
|
We don't care.
The discussion is about: why a Seller would be able to set Completed.
Final argument being for me that this doesn't comply with the Completed status:
https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1462312
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Apr 5, 2024 15:04 | | Subject: | Re: Setting Orders to Complete! | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| | | | |
There is a reason sellers might want to set an order to complete.
If you want to delete an old shipping method, you cannot if there is an open
order using that method
|
There's also NO reason to immediately delete a shipping method.
Simply disable it and forget it, delete it later on - it won't be shown in
your shop while disabled.
In short, there is still no reason a seller would set Completed an order
|
Sure there are work arounds to solve a problem. But if a seller wants to remove
a method, they cannot and are warned it is because there are open orders (even
if they are filed). Hence they can be tempted to complete ones that are already
months old.
There is also the issue that store wide minimum orders take into account any
disabled methods. So if you have multiple redundant methods that are disabled
you still have to edit every one of them if you want to raise the store minimum,
even though they cannot be used by a buyer. Of course, this is not the buyer's
fault (or care), just dodgy programming blocking changes.
It also seems strange that you cannot delete a shipping method while an order
is open, but you can change all the variable parameters in that method.
|
|
| Author: | 1001bricks | | Posted: | Apr 5, 2024 13:34 | | Subject: | Re: Setting Orders to Complete! | | Viewed: | 52 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, yorbrick writes:
| | In Suggestions, MMillere writes:
| | Since sellers are NOT supposed to set orders to Complete.....
Can we make it so they can't?
Because when a seller does it by mistake, we can not send a ship notice thru
the system
Thanx
Milissa
|
There is a reason sellers might want to set an order to complete.
If you want to delete an old shipping method, you cannot if there is an open
order using that method
|
There's also NO reason to immediately delete a shipping method.
Simply disable it and forget it, delete it later on - it won't be shown in
your shop while disabled.
In short, there is still no reason a seller would set Completed an order
|
|
| Author: | 1001bricks | | Posted: | Apr 5, 2024 13:29 | | Subject: | Re: Connect Wanted List to My Collection | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, TheHatter13 writes:
| | I asked this same thing previously but it is kind of a manual process that I
chose. You can use the apply order in the Wat list at the top but if you have
2 orders with the same part you can accidently apply some parts twice if you
are not careful.
I ended up using BrickStore which is a free program that connects to Bricklink.
I download my orders and then sort by part number. Once I have this I go to the
Search in the Want List menu and search for that part. Then, I can compare the
numbers and update the have quantities.
|
Great move! 
|
|
| Author: | Nubs_Select | | Posted: | Apr 5, 2024 13:05 | | Subject: | Re: Setting Orders to Complete! | | Viewed: | 34 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, yorbrick writes:
| | In Suggestions, MMillere writes:
| | Since sellers are NOT supposed to set orders to Complete.....
Can we make it so they can't?
Because when a seller does it by mistake, we can not send a ship notice thru
the system
Thanx
Milissa
|
There is a reason sellers might want to set an order to complete.
If you want to delete an old shipping method, you cannot if there is an open
order using that method, even if it was delivered months ago and feedback left.
Obviously you can disable the shipping method, change the name if it conflicts
with another name, set the minimum order value for that shipping method to 9999
if it conflicts with a change in the store minimum order value, but all that
is a faff just because someone hasn't marked an order as complete.
|
Like you mentioned you can simply choose disable and it will be off and then
in 6-months you can delete it. Plus that way your guaranteed not to potentially
cause issues to the buyer
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Apr 5, 2024 12:50 | | Subject: | Re: Setting Orders to Complete! | | Viewed: | 44 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, MMillere writes:
| | Since sellers are NOT supposed to set orders to Complete.....
Can we make it so they can't?
Because when a seller does it by mistake, we can not send a ship notice thru
the system
Thanx
Milissa
|
There is a reason sellers might want to set an order to complete.
If you want to delete an old shipping method, you cannot if there is an open
order using that method, even if it was delivered months ago and feedback left.
Obviously you can disable the shipping method, change the name if it conflicts
with another name, set the minimum order value for that shipping method to 9999
if it conflicts with a change in the store minimum order value, but all that
is a faff just because someone hasn't marked an order as complete.
|
|
| Author: | TheHatter13 | | Posted: | Apr 5, 2024 06:14 | | Subject: | Re: Connect Wanted List to My Collection | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| I asked this same thing previously but it is kind of a manual process that I
chose. You can use the apply order in the Wat list at the top but if you have
2 orders with the same part you can accidently apply some parts twice if you
are not careful.
I ended up using BrickStore which is a free program that connects to Bricklink.
I download my orders and then sort by part number. Once I have this I go to the
Search in the Want List menu and search for that part. Then, I can compare the
numbers and update the have quantities.
|
|
| Author: | mediatlon | | Posted: | Apr 5, 2024 05:51 | | Subject: | Connect Wanted List to My Collection | | Viewed: | 51 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| I already found a way to add parts from an order to My Collection (using XML).
To avoid ordering the same part again, it would be helpful to see how many of
that part is already in my collection when building a Wanted List.
The "Have" box in the Wanted List is just valid for that list, and entered
one part by one, as far as I could see, so that doesn't help. I'm not
a seller, so I just want to use My Collection to track what I already have and
use it to build new Wanted lists.
Thanks,
M
|
|
| Author: | maxx3001 | | Posted: | Apr 4, 2024 04:47 | | Subject: | Re: Give access to all colors | | Viewed: | 49 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Turez writes:
| | In Suggestions, maxx3001 writes:
| | Please give 3001special access to all colors in the catalog, including Modulex
colors.
Often when uploading test bricks, it is hard to find the exact color, so having
all colors available is a must.
Also, some test bricks actually come in Modulex colors.
It would be great if this can be added.
Thanks,
Maxx
|
Moved to suggestions because this requires a code change. We can't do anything
here with our admin tools.
|
Thank you 👍
|
|
| Author: | BB12 | | Posted: | Apr 4, 2024 04:45 | | Subject: | stud.io app | | Viewed: | 55 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| Hi, I was wondering if it would be possible that Stud.IO will ever become an
app. I would really look forward to be able to make and edit LEGO models on my
tablet!
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Apr 4, 2024 01:16 | | Subject: | Re: New filter based on % off | | Viewed: | 22 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, TheHatter13 writes:
| | That could work but I would still have to manually go through them. I use the
want list filter and select the min option to apply in bulk. If I just want parts
at a certain percentage that would not work as the lower sale items would still
be in the list.
|
If this was common buyer behaviour because a tool allows it, sellers would double
their prices and offer 50 % off on everything.
Some already do that type of thing, and advertise fake sales in the forum.
|
|
| Author: | axaday | | Posted: | Apr 3, 2024 19:48 | | Subject: | Re: New filter based on % off | | Viewed: | 31 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, TheHatter13 writes:
| | I have seen a lot of sellers offer multiple different discounts. It would be
nice to have a filter that you can choose the discounts you want to see instead
of just all sales. Like if a shop has different sale percentages at 10, 25, 30,
50 and 75 percent off you could filter for everything above 50%.
|
I think if we had it you would come to see it was useless. If you were choosing
between Walmart, Target, or TRU, it would be useful, but different shops on Bricklink
routinely list things 3-4 times as much as other stores and those tend to be
the ones running sales. You can’t get much of an idea where you will get the
lowest prices by sorting by sale %.
|
|
| Author: | TheHatter13 | | Posted: | Apr 3, 2024 18:41 | | Subject: | Re: New filter based on % off | | Viewed: | 32 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| That could work but I would still have to manually go through them. I use the
want list filter and select the min option to apply in bulk. If I just want parts
at a certain percentage that would not work as the lower sale items would still
be in the list.
|
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Apr 3, 2024 16:25 | | Subject: | Re: New filter based on % off | | Viewed: | 36 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, TheHatter13 writes:
| | I have seen a lot of sellers offer multiple different discounts. It would be
nice to have a filter that you can choose the discounts you want to see instead
of just all sales. Like if a shop has different sale percentages at 10, 25, 30,
50 and 75 percent off you could filter for everything above 50%.
|
Just sort by % off descending.
|
|
| Author: | M_R | | Posted: | Apr 3, 2024 15:25 | | Subject: | Re: Give access to all colors | | Viewed: | 63 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, maxx3001 writes:
| | Please give 3001special access to all colors in the catalog, including Modulex
colors.
Often when uploading test bricks, it is hard to find the exact color, so having
all colors available is a must.
Also, some test bricks actually come in Modulex colors.
It would be great if this can be added.
Thanks,
Maxx
|
Good one Maxx !
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
Canada, Ontario
United Kingdom, England
USA, Washington
United Kingdom, Scotland
Spain, Comunidad Valenciana
France, Nouvelle-Aquitaine
Belgium, Flemish Brabant
Netherlands, Utrecht
Sweden, Södermanland