Discussion Forum: Inventories(Post New Message)
Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full      Show Messages: All | Without Replies

 Author: TheHatter13 View Messages Posted By TheHatter13
 Posted: Mar 15, 2024 16:45
 Subject: Re: How to download size and comments columns
 Viewed: 30 times
 Topic: Inventories
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
For the store download I use BrickStore. Its a great app.
 Author: hpoort View Messages Posted By hpoort
 Posted: Mar 15, 2024 13:30
 Subject: Re: Tile 1x1 / tile 1x2
 Viewed: 34 times
 Topic: Inventories
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Inventories, Dino writes:
  In Inventories, yorbrick writes:
  
  The variants with and without groove seem to have merged.

The tile's where not on the list for merging?

They haven't been merged there are still separate entries for normal (with
groove) and without groove.

 
Part No: 3070  Name: Tile 1 x 1
* 
3070 Tile 1 x 1
Parts: Tile

 
Part No: 3070a  Name: Tile 1 x 1 without Groove
* 
3070a Tile 1 x 1 without Groove
Parts: Tile

 
Part No: 3069  Name: Tile 1 x 2
* 
3069 Tile 1 x 2
Parts: Tile

 
Part No: 3069a  Name: Tile 1 x 2 without Groove
* 
3069a Tile 1 x 2 without Groove
Parts: Tile

They have been renamed to remove the "with groove" from the modern part
(well, 40 years old, but non-vintage part), and also renumbered from 3069b to
3069 and so on, so that the BL number correctly references the number that has
been used for about four decades and is not influenced by a part that hasn't
been produced for almost half a century.

3070a should actually be 3070 and 3070 should be 3070a. The same with 3069/3069a.
3070a has been around since 1965, 3070 only since 1972. 3 letters would also
be saved.
But what can you ask of the catalogue administrators in the meantime...

According to Russell, the 3069b and 3070b were never the grooved variety but
have always been the umbrella entity. The chosen renumbering reflects that.
 Author: yorbrick View Messages Posted By yorbrick
 Posted: Mar 15, 2024 09:13
 Subject: Re: Tile 1x1 / tile 1x2
 Viewed: 51 times
 Topic: Inventories
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
  3070a should actually be 3070 and 3070 should be 3070a. The same with 3069/3069a.
3070a has been around since 1965, 3070 only since 1972. 3 letters would also
be saved.
But what can you ask of the catalogue administrators in the meantime...

I disagree. It should not be based on what came first, especially where the change
between them predates Bricklink and the internet. Nobody was calling these 3070
and 3070a in 1973 or in 1983 or in 1993. The 'modern' part had been in
existence for decades before bricklink was started and so it would have made
sense to call the modern part 3070 and the vintage one 3070a or 3070old. Most
people looking for a 3070 would want the modern part, not the vintage one. It
makes sense to use the LEGO part number for the most common version or current
version.
 Author: Dino View Messages Posted By Dino
 Posted: Mar 15, 2024 09:05
 Subject: Re: Tile 1x1 / tile 1x2
 Viewed: 50 times
 Topic: Inventories
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Inventories, yorbrick writes:
  
  The variants with and without groove seem to have merged.

The tile's where not on the list for merging?

They haven't been merged there are still separate entries for normal (with
groove) and without groove.

 
Part No: 3070  Name: Tile 1 x 1
* 
3070 Tile 1 x 1
Parts: Tile

 
Part No: 3070a  Name: Tile 1 x 1 without Groove
* 
3070a Tile 1 x 1 without Groove
Parts: Tile

 
Part No: 3069  Name: Tile 1 x 2
* 
3069 Tile 1 x 2
Parts: Tile

 
Part No: 3069a  Name: Tile 1 x 2 without Groove
* 
3069a Tile 1 x 2 without Groove
Parts: Tile

They have been renamed to remove the "with groove" from the modern part
(well, 40 years old, but non-vintage part), and also renumbered from 3069b to
3069 and so on, so that the BL number correctly references the number that has
been used for about four decades and is not influenced by a part that hasn't
been produced for almost half a century.

3070a should actually be 3070 and 3070 should be 3070a. The same with 3069/3069a.
3070a has been around since 1965, 3070 only since 1972. 3 letters would also
be saved.
But what can you ask of the catalogue administrators in the meantime...
 Author: yorbrick View Messages Posted By yorbrick
 Posted: Mar 15, 2024 08:50
 Subject: Re: Tile 1x1 / tile 1x2
 Viewed: 48 times
 Topic: Inventories
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
  The variants with and without groove seem to have merged.

The tile's where not on the list for merging?

They haven't been merged there are still separate entries for normal (with
groove) and without groove.

 
Part No: 3070  Name: Tile 1 x 1
* 
3070 Tile 1 x 1
Parts: Tile

 
Part No: 3070a  Name: Tile 1 x 1 without Groove
* 
3070a Tile 1 x 1 without Groove
Parts: Tile

 
Part No: 3069  Name: Tile 1 x 2
* 
3069 Tile 1 x 2
Parts: Tile

 
Part No: 3069a  Name: Tile 1 x 2 without Groove
* 
3069a Tile 1 x 2 without Groove
Parts: Tile

They have been renamed to remove the "with groove" from the modern part
(well, 40 years old, but non-vintage part), and also renumbered from 3069b to
3069 and so on, so that the BL number correctly references the number that has
been used for about four decades and is not influenced by a part that hasn't
been produced for almost half a century.

Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More