BrickLink Discussion Forum

In Inventories, StarBrick writes:

If the seller didn't change the ID, what/who did?

If the seller didn't change the prices, what/who did?

Do you have proofs the seller didn’t do that?
Do you have proofs the next possibility, BL, did that?

What Sylvain/1001bricks said earlier is exactly that:
— when someone blames BL, they don’t have proofs,
— those who have backups and traces always find it’s their fault / can never
pin it on BL.

Author:

1001bricks

Posted:

Feb 25, 2024 12:41

Subject:

Re: PROBLEM WITH DARK BROWN 3062 ITEM

Viewed:

30 times

Topic:

If this is true, the database and the way it handles orders and other changes
is even more gone astray than I could imagine....

No - it just means the contrary.

I almost had never any stock problem.

The ones In thought happened was almost always an error or a normal behaviour
in the end.
Apart a few times in a few years.

So, that means if you're not able to SAVE and CHECK with inventories what
you did, then you can't say "It's BL!!!!"

Author:

SylvainLS

Posted:

Feb 25, 2024 12:39

Subject:

Re: PROBLEM WITH DARK BROWN 3062 ITEM

Viewed:

47 times

Topic:

In Inventories, StarBrick writes:

"... that sellers still don't download their Inventory XML everyday and
use
BrickStore to compare or restore any problem."

Seriously?
Do you really say that this is what's required to maintain a correct inventory
on BL these days?

That's the equivalent of checking every aisle in a grocery store after closing
time.
Every day.
Again.
All day's.

....

If this is true, the database and the way it handles orders and other changes
is even more gone astray than I could imagine....

That’s not what Sylvain said.

He said that if you don’t have proofs it’s BL, then your complaints are moot.

It’s like realizing one aisle of your grocery store is totally empty and blaming
it on magical gremlins coming to eat things at night.
Come to think of it, it’s how the theory of spontaneous generation came about.
Look it out and how it was debunked. Spoiler: it’s about proofs and science,
not magic.

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Feb 25, 2024 12:35

Subject:

Re: PROBLEM WITH DARK BROWN 3062 ITEM

Viewed:

43 times

Topic:

If the seller didn't change the ID, what/who did?

If the seller didn't change the prices, what/who did?

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Feb 25, 2024 12:31

Subject:

Re: PROBLEM WITH DARK BROWN 3062 ITEM

Viewed:

46 times

Topic:

Author:

SylvainLS

Posted:

Feb 25, 2024 12:22

Subject:

Re: PROBLEM WITH DARK BROWN 3062 ITEM

Viewed:

45 times

Topic:

In Inventories, StarBrick writes:

no chance, they are NOT messaging individual sellers about this.
stupid merge indeed

3062b wasn’t merged. It was renamed (removing the ‘open stud’) and re-IDed to
3062. 3062a still exists:

3062 Brick, Round 1 x 1
Parts: Brick, Round

3062a Brick, Round 1 x 1 - Solid Stud, Bottom Lip
Parts: Brick, Round

Author:

1001bricks

Posted:

Feb 25, 2024 12:22

Subject:

Re: PROBLEM WITH DARK BROWN 3062 ITEM

Viewed:

59 times

Topic:

In Inventories, minifig_75 writes:

Hey there!
So..** I'm a seller **
I just noticed that all my DARK BROWN 3062 turned into BROWN, AND their prices
changed too, from inventories A & C!!!

It's SO UNBELIEVABLE

... that sellers still don't download their Inventory XML everyday and use
BrickStore to compare or restore any problem.

So until then, it's probably not a BrickLink problem.

Or you have some versions associated with an impossible color (like old
part with a new color), hence the color change.

That's one of the versions problems; many lots for sale are just either lies,
mistakes or typos

Author:

StarBrick

Posted:

Feb 25, 2024 12:15

Subject:

Re: PROBLEM WITH DARK BROWN 3062 ITEM

Viewed:

57 times

Topic:

no chance, they are NOT messaging individual sellers about this.
stupid merge indeed

Author:

minifig_75

Posted:

Feb 25, 2024 12:12

Subject:

Re: PROBLEM WITH DARK BROWN 3062 ITEM

Viewed:

69 times

Topic:

In Inventories, StarBrick writes:

Where these with solid studs?

Then it's a merge consequence.....

Nope, 3062B, so.. yeah, I would have liked to know about it through a very well
known and used means, the email...

Author:

minifig_75

Posted:

Feb 25, 2024 11:40

Subject:

PROBLEM WITH DARK BROWN 3062 ITEM

Viewed:

190 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Hey there!
So..** I'm a seller **
I just noticed that all my DARK BROWN 3062 turned into BROWN, AND their prices
changed too, from inventories A & C!!!
It's SO UNBELIEVABLE, I didn't get any mail from the BL team saying there
was a major issue since the variant merge...
Please, has anyone noticed this issue?
are there any other bugs??

Thanks!
Soon

Author:

ilovelegostoo

Posted:

Feb 23, 2024 12:42

Subject:

Re: Personal set inventory

Viewed:

22 times

Topic:

Another option is to create a rebrickable.com account. Upload your inventory
to rebrickable. Find the set and it will show you the parts you have and those
that you need. You can also create lists of bricks that may not be in your bricklink
inventory.

Author:

1001bricks

Posted:

Feb 22, 2024 11:16

Subject:

Re: Personal set inventory

Viewed:

26 times

Topic:

In Inventories, Nicolasamico37 writes:

In Inventories, andyb181279 writes:

Hi all
How do you find out which parts for a set you have in your inventory without
going through everything?
My daughter found a part she likes and I told her if I have all parts we can
build it

Many thanks

Hi,
The easiest way would be to make a Wanted List and check this Wanted List in
your store just after

Nicolas

It's NOT the easiest.

https://www.brickstore.dev/ makes it far easier.

A few clicks to find which parts are in your shop and (if you wish) remove them
from your shop, which is impossible with a wanted-list.

Author:

Nicolasamico37

Posted:

Feb 22, 2024 09:14

Subject:

Re: Personal set inventory

Viewed:

30 times

Topic:

In Inventories, andyb181279 writes:

Hi,
The easiest way would be to make a Wanted List and check this Wanted List in
your store just after

Nicolas

Author:

andyb181279

Posted:

Feb 22, 2024 08:57

Subject:

Personal set inventory

Viewed:

81 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Author:

Apollo_123

Posted:

Feb 18, 2024 13:01

Subject:

Re: Note to inventories admin

Viewed:

32 times

Topic:

In Inventories, hpoort writes:

In Inventories, Apollo_123 writes:

Hi

I was upload an inventory of a part and reached the "note to inventories
admin" box and did not understand what I should include in that message.
For context the part I was inventorying was a motorcycle from an old city set
that I used to have in my collection that I am now parting out and noticed the
bike had no inventory. I bought the set sealed when it was released so I am sure
that the parts are the correct one of the assembly.

Thanks

You should put the "I bought the set sealed when it was released" line
into that notes field.

Thats what I ended up putting in

Author:

hpoort

Posted:

Feb 17, 2024 02:22

Subject:

Re: Note to inventories admin

Viewed:

34 times

Topic:

In Inventories, Apollo_123 writes:

You should put the "I bought the set sealed when it was released" line
into that notes field.

Author:

Nubs_Select

Posted:

Feb 16, 2024 20:36

Subject:

Re: Note to inventories admin

Viewed:

33 times

Topic:

Normally I enter something like "work in progress" or "ready!"
or say something about it such as "this item had no inventory so I checked
the one I had on hand..." and so on

Author:

Apollo_123

Posted:

Feb 16, 2024 20:30

Subject:

Note to inventories admin

Viewed:

98 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Author:

pcthurman

Posted:

Feb 5, 2024 17:03

Subject:

Re: Why is Mack not considered a minifigure?

Viewed:

51 times

Topic:

In Inventories, jennnifer writes:

In Inventories, pcthurman writes:

In set

8486-1 (Inv) Mack's Team Truck
341 Parts, 1 Minifigure, 2011
Sets: Cars: Cars 2

Why is Mack not considered a minifigure? I do not see a difference
between Mack or Lightning other than size and well yes Mack has a trailer but
in the movies he is a character. So why the difference?

Cass T

Is Mack just the Tractor or the Tractor and the Trailer?

I'm going to say the former. That makes the Trailer an accessory that shouldn't
be included??

~Jen

I believe just the cab is the minifigure Mack. Yes, the trailer is a "wearable"
accessory however I would not include the trailer as such.

Cass T

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Feb 5, 2024 12:24

Subject:

Re: Why is Mack not considered a minifigure?

Viewed:

36 times

Topic:

In Inventories, starbeanie writes:

Mack is certainly eligible to be a minifig. Afterall, we have

Minifig No: crs080s Name: Siddeley with Stickers

crs080s (Inv) Siddeley with Stickers
Minifigures: Cars: Cars 2

Presumably both a minifigure with stickers and a vehicle without them, like that
plane.

Author:

starbeanie

Posted:

Feb 5, 2024 12:17

Subject:

Re: Why is Mack not considered a minifigure?

Viewed:

33 times

Topic:

Mack is certainly eligible to be a minifig. Afterall, we have

crs080s (Inv) Siddeley with Stickers
Minifigures: Cars: Cars 2

In Inventories, yorbrick writes:

In Inventories, jennnifer writes:

In Inventories, pcthurman writes:

In set

8486-1 (Inv) Mack's Team Truck
341 Parts, 1 Minifigure, 2011
Sets: Cars: Cars 2

Is Mack just the Tractor or the Tractor and the Trailer?

I'm going to say the former. That makes the Trailer an accessory that shouldn't
be included??

~Jen

Isn't it like clothing, or an accessory attached to his back like in

Minifig No: sh673 Name: Iron Man - Silver Hexagon on Chest, Wings without Stickers

sh673 (Inv) Iron Man - Silver Hexagon on Chest, Wings without Stickers
Minifigures: Super Heroes: Avengers

I guess this is the issue of having obviously not minifigures in the minifigures
category. Small animal characters like Scooby Doo or big ones like Smaug go in
animals, so it seems odd to put vehicle based characters in minifigs and not
in the existing vehicle category. If this is going ahead, presumably Ent / Treebeard
spa0019 can also be moved into minifigures too.

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Feb 5, 2024 12:03

Subject:

Re: Why is Mack not considered a minifigure?

Viewed:

40 times

Topic:

In Inventories, jennnifer writes:

In Inventories, pcthurman writes:

In set

8486-1 (Inv) Mack's Team Truck
341 Parts, 1 Minifigure, 2011
Sets: Cars: Cars 2

Is Mack just the Tractor or the Tractor and the Trailer?

I'm going to say the former. That makes the Trailer an accessory that shouldn't
be included??

~Jen

Isn't it like clothing, or an accessory attached to his back like in

sh673 (Inv) Iron Man - Silver Hexagon on Chest, Wings without Stickers
Minifigures: Super Heroes: Avengers

Author:

jennnifer

Posted:

Feb 5, 2024 10:08

Subject:

Re: Why is Mack not considered a minifigure?

Viewed:

61 times

Topic:

In Inventories, pcthurman writes:

In set

8486-1 (Inv) Mack's Team Truck
341 Parts, 1 Minifigure, 2011
Sets: Cars: Cars 2

Is Mack just the Tractor or the Tractor and the Trailer?

I'm going to say the former. That makes the Trailer an accessory that shouldn't
be included??

~Jen

Author:

randyf

Posted:

Feb 4, 2024 22:58

Subject:

Re: Why is Mack not considered a minifigure?

Viewed:

64 times

Topic:

In Inventories, pcthurman writes:

In set

8486-1 (Inv) Mack's Team Truck
341 Parts, 1 Minifigure, 2011
Sets: Cars: Cars 2

Nobody added him.

Author:

pcthurman

Posted:

Feb 4, 2024 22:34

Subject:

Why is Mack not considered a minifigure?

Viewed:

165 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

In set

8486-1 (Inv) Mack's Team Truck
341 Parts, 1 Minifigure, 2011
Sets: Cars: Cars 2

Author:

michaeljeru

Posted:

Feb 3, 2024 07:38

Subject:

Re: How to add a minifigure in a inventory ?

Viewed:

23 times

Topic:

Thanks for your answer, it worked indeed !
I added the image on the sh946.
For the sh946, I have 2 parts pending approval (head and torso), maybe because
the text isbover 150 characters, but for a first, I've found the golden ticket
with this Venomized Dr Octopus, with two parts dual sided, and a torso with 2
differents Arms and hands colors ! A nightmare...
If anyone can help do better than what I shortened to my Best... 😬🙄

Thanks

In Inventories, BricksThatStick writes:

In Inventories, michaeljeru writes:

Hi,
I've created my first inventory submission for the new set 76275.
I can't find how to add the 2 minifigures (including sh946 whose submission
is pending approval) to set inventory ?
I try to add it using the form under the inventory, but wether I try the new
sh946 or the existing sh684, none is found...

Thanks for your help by advance.

For sh684 just ignore the item not found message. Just click the link and it
will go away and allow you to add the quantity and add it.

For pending sh946 we need an image uploading for it before it can be approved.

Thanks,
Paul.

Author:

BricksThatStick

Posted:

Feb 3, 2024 06:13

Subject:

Re: How to add a minifigure in a inventory ?

Viewed:

19 times

Topic:

In Inventories, michaeljeru writes:

Author:

michaeljeru

Posted:

Feb 3, 2024 04:01

Subject:

How to add a minifigure in a inventory ?

Viewed:

46 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Author:

jennnifer

Posted:

Jan 29, 2024 08:26

Subject:

Re: Ninjago 9446: 3684c should be 3684a

Viewed:

40 times

Topic:

In Inventories, SDF_Bricks writes:

Instruction manuals are not a source for variants. LEGO uses new image renders
or old image renders indiscriminately.

https://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=1445276

I do have 2 copies of such set to support this as well.

https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=3684c&idColor=86#T=S&C=86&O={%22color%22:86,%22iconly%22:0}

https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=3684a#T=S&O={%22iconly%22:0}

It's real easy to add an image and link to your posts. Click the Add catalog
image button.

~Jen

Author:

SDF_Bricks

Posted:

Jan 29, 2024 05:28

Subject:

Ninjago 9446: 3684c should be 3684a

Viewed:

62 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

In set 9446 Destiny's Bounty, the current inventory lists part 3684c.
It should in fact be part 3684a.

This can be confirmed from the instructions manual, which clearly shows 3684
(with hollow studs).

I do have 2 copies of such set to support this as well.

https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=3684c&idColor=86#T=S&C=86&O={%22color%22:86,%22iconly%22:0}

https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=3684a#T=S&O={%22iconly%22:0}

Author:

tec

Posted:

Jan 25, 2024 15:36

Subject:

Re: 3847 vs 3847a

Viewed:

64 times

Topic:

the log
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogInvChangeItem.asp?itemItemID=51687
shows some adjustments but in distant past, 5 yrs ago!

Author:

rickcraine

Posted:

Jan 25, 2024 13:10

Subject:

Re: 3847 vs 3847a

Viewed:

42 times

Topic:

In Inventories, archmage writes:

Hello everyone.
I know that Bricklink is close to operate significant variations merge operations
on its inventory, so I don't know if the subject part is also part of this
operations (but I hope it will).
I have used very often Bricklink inventory as reference to complete my sets,
but lately I have noticed that part 3847 seems to have replaced part 3847a in
many old castle sets inventory, and not as an alternate part.
As a lego-castle loving child and then adult I have owned and built many of the
sets I see now listed with 3847 swords and in my experience they doesn't
appear in most of the ones I recall or still have built for exposition.
This post in not meant to be a rant about something I see as a discrepancy, but
more curiosity about how you're dealing with that. For instance I assembled
set 1596 and 1547: both show in the box photos a 3847a sword, but both have as
inventory only a 3847 sword. Should I list them as incomplete, or being a mold
variant I should not?

Thank you for your time and, maybe, answer

Another great example as to why things should stay the way they are. Personally,
though, saying it has a mold variant seems like it would be the only logical
thing to do.

Author:

archmage

Posted:

Jan 25, 2024 13:06

Subject:

3847 vs 3847a

Viewed:

106 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Author:

Nubs_Select

Posted:

Jan 22, 2024 18:26

Subject:

Re: part out inventory

Viewed:

25 times

Topic:

In Inventories, kittybrickz writes:

Thanks Nubs!

Glad I could help!

Author:

kittybrickz

Posted:

Jan 22, 2024 18:25

Subject:

Re: part out inventory

Viewed:

25 times

Topic:

Thanks Nubs!

Author:

Nubs_Select

Posted:

Jan 22, 2024 16:08

Subject:

Re: part out inventory

Viewed:

32 times

Topic:

https://www.bricklink.com/catalogInvAdd.asp

Author:

kittybrickz

Posted:

Jan 22, 2024 15:51

Subject:

part out inventory

Viewed:

77 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Hi!
I read somewhere that users can submit an inventory list for a set, how do I
go about that?

Have an epic day!

Author:

randyf

Posted:

Jan 19, 2024 13:56

Subject:

Re: gs014 includes weapons?

Viewed:

59 times

Topic:

In Inventories, Steineflut writes:

Hello there,

any particular reason why gs014 includes his weapons? I just stumbled across
it and thought it was weird.

Thanks,
Nadine

It is a catalog inconsistency, and it isn't the only one. These may or may
not be dealt with in the future.

Cheers,
Randy

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Jan 19, 2024 10:07

Subject:

Re: gs014 includes weapons?

Viewed:

45 times

Topic:

In Inventories, Steineflut writes:

Hello there,

any particular reason why gs014 includes his weapons? I just stumbled across
it and thought it was weird.

Thanks,
Nadine

Aren't they meant to be tentacles, so part of the creature rather than discrete
weapons.

Author:

Steineflut

Posted:

Jan 19, 2024 09:59

Subject:

gs014 includes weapons?

Viewed:

76 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Hello there,

any particular reason why gs014 includes his weapons? I just stumbled across
it and thought it was weird.

Thanks,
Nadine

Author:

Turez

Posted:

Jan 16, 2024 14:59

Subject:

Re: Inventory change for set 8877

Viewed:

24 times

Topic:

In Catalog Requests, s.j.stegeman writes:

Item 32140 is incorrectly in the inventory of set 8877. This should be part 32526,
the amount (4) is correct. See page 26-27 and 51-52 of the instruction booklet
of this set

Please see https://www.bricklink.com/messageThread.asp?ID=270161

I have added a note to the inventory that the instructions show a wrong part.

Author:

s.j.stegeman

Posted:

Jan 16, 2024 13:55

Subject:

Inventory change for set 8877

Viewed:

52 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Item 32140 is incorrectly in the inventory of set 8877. This should be part 32526,
the amount (4) is correct. See page 26-27 and 51-52 of the instruction booklet
of this set

Author:

goldknight

Posted:

Jan 12, 2024 09:42

Subject:

Re: Due to the upcoming variants merge do you...

Viewed:

60 times

Topic:

In Inventories, 1977_mauro writes:

...still will differentiate the merged variants using the comment field?

Choose:

a) yes
b) no
c) not sure yet

Keep in mind that it won't be visible anymore in the old set inventories
which variant has been used.

Thanks Mauro

Yes!!!!

Author:

zorbanj

Posted:

Jan 12, 2024 09:24

Subject:

Re: Due to the upcoming variants merge do you...

Viewed:

50 times

Topic:

b) No

Most sales of variants are driven by the inventories, which in turn populate
buyer want lists. If the variants aren't going to be in the inventories,
there is no point in differentiating them.

I'll keep what I currently have separated and try to send the same variant
for an order, but once I run out that's it. My shop is small and I cannot
charge the premium prices needed to justify the additional labor of continuing
to sort these to service for the vintage collector/restorer market.

In Inventories, 1977_mauro writes:

Author:

jennnifer

Posted:

Jan 12, 2024 08:55

Subject:

Re: Due to the upcoming variants merge do you...

Viewed:

47 times

Topic:

In Inventories, 1977_mauro writes:

Yes, I do plan on listing the different molds whenever possible. However, I am
already in the habit of distinguishing between many variants in my Comments.
It's not a great system though and requires a significant amount of extra
work on my part. I wouldn't think it is a viable option for any other than
specialty or hobby shops like mine. It's a nightmare to check inventory
when you have multiple lots per part. I have to label everything and note how
many total lots I have so I don't mess up and grab the wrong lot when pulling
orders.

I also distinguish between 'good' used and play wear. So, I end up with
many lots for vintage parts. I would bet it is actually quite off-putting to
those trying to fill out wanted lists. I constantly worry that the Easy Buy system
is bringing buyers to my shop without reading the Comments before placing an
order.

Thanks,
~Jen

Author:

tec

Posted:

Jan 12, 2024 08:44

Subject:

Re: Due to the upcoming variants merge do you...

Viewed:

36 times

Topic:

I hate mixing frosted bricks
I hate mixing axle holes

Author:

Stuart9

Posted:

Jan 12, 2024 08:40

Subject:

Re: Due to the upcoming variants merge do you...

Viewed:

36 times

Topic:

a)

Already use it to separate unrecognised variants, this just means I have even
more, certain to increase in future when other changes are implemented.

In Inventories, 1977_mauro writes:

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Jan 12, 2024 07:07

Subject:

Re: Due to the upcoming variants merge do you...

Viewed:

52 times

Topic:

Those are good arguments against doing it.

There are good arguments on both sides. For example, the fact that in LEGO doesn't
distinguish some mould variants is a good argument why BL doesn't need to.
But then there are cases where LEGO does distinguish and BL aggregates them under
a single number plus letter for the variant.

It could be complicated where BL has used single entries for parts when LEGO
has used multiple. For example, I wonder what will happen in the longer term
to parts like this.

6019 Plate, Modified 1 x 1 with U Clip (Horizontal Grip)
Parts: Plate, Modified

61252 Plate, Modified 1 x 1 with Open O Clip (Horizontal Grip)
Parts: Plate, Modified

where they have different BL code numbers and

4085a Plate, Modified 1 x 1 with Open O Clip Thin (Vertical Grip)
Parts: Plate, Modified

4085b Plate, Modified 1 x 1 with U Clip Thin (Vertical Grip)
Parts: Plate, Modified

4085c Plate, Modified 1 x 1 with U Clip Thick (Vertical Grip)
Parts: Plate, Modified

4085d Plate, Modified 1 x 1 with Open O Clip Thick (Vertical Grip)
Parts: Plate, Modified

where they use the same number but variant letters, even though LEGO has used
a range of different item numbers for the d variant. Should the latter be merged
or should they be split into different part numbers? Should the different d variants
have multiple entries even though they appear to be the same thing. It seems
strange that these two types of clip are treated in a very different way, one
keeping two distinct codes, the other aggregating them into one but using made
up code letters to distinguish them.

If the image comparing 4085 variants is removed, and there is just one 4085 entry
not showing any differences, will most people even care? If they can use any
3001 from the late 70s onwards to complete a 1982 set or a 2024 set because the
inventory says so, why not use any 1x1 clip with vertical grip because the inventory
also says so. Does it really matter that one person (often later) said that they
found a particular variant in their set, so everyone else's set should be
the same if it is to be the real thing and allowed to be sold here. Of course,
it may well be true that they found that exact part in a sealed set that cost
them $100s, but should that impact on everyone else if they want to sell a used
set.

Author:

infinibrix

Posted:

Jan 12, 2024 06:36

Subject:

Re: Due to the upcoming variants merge do you...

Viewed:

43 times

Topic:

In Inventories, 1977_mauro writes:

No but for the first few months I will keep them separated so that where possible
I can pick a buyers order with all the same type. Once I feel more confident
that the buying community has become accustomed to the fact that they could receive
either variant within the same order batch I may then start to merge my stocks
into the same storage bin.

Author:

Hurt

Posted:

Jan 12, 2024 06:33

Subject:

Re: Due to the upcoming variants merge do you...

Viewed:

48 times

Topic:

In Inventories, yorbrick writes:

In Inventories, 1977_mauro writes:

No. I think such comments might confuse and possibly put off some buyers. The
a, b, c type variants only really exist because they were catalogued here. If
they are no longer catalogued here then adding a comment that you will get a
'b' variant will be lost on many buyers and may leave them wondering
what they will get. It really depends on which images are retained to show the
part once merged. Where vintage parts come from known sets, I think I will comment
as i do now on the date range or the set they came from, if those parts attract
a premium price.

Those are good arguments against doing it.

Author:

axaday

Posted:

Jan 12, 2024 05:35

Subject:

Re: Due to the upcoming variants merge do you...

Viewed:

62 times

Topic:

In Inventories, 1977_mauro writes:

I don't know.

I've never pulled the trigger so far and maybe I won't again, but it
is another moment where I'm thinking about just walking away.

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Jan 12, 2024 05:04

Subject:

Re: Due to the upcoming variants merge do you...

Viewed:

53 times

Topic:

In Inventories, 1977_mauro writes:

Author:

Nubs_Select

Posted:

Jan 12, 2024 03:24

Subject:

Re: Due to the upcoming variants merge do you...

Viewed:

42 times

Topic:

most likely but not 100% certain but most likely will. Also Will try to comment
more in unseparated variants perhaps

Author:

coevorden01

Posted:

Jan 12, 2024 03:18

Subject:

Re: Due to the upcoming variants merge do you...

Viewed:

42 times

Topic:

In Inventories, 1977_mauro writes:

Author:

wildchicken13

Posted:

Jan 12, 2024 03:12

Subject:

Re: Due to the upcoming variants merge do you...

Viewed:

46 times

Topic:

In Inventories, 1977_mauro writes:

B) No

Author:

1977_mauro

Posted:

Jan 12, 2024 03:07

Subject:

Due to the upcoming variants merge do you...

Viewed:

197 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Author:

ghyde

Posted:

Jan 10, 2024 14:09

Subject:

Re: Flag in another set?

Viewed:

35 times

Topic:

In Inventories, eritas writes:

In Inventories, ghyde writes:

In Inventories, eritas writes:

I have part x376px6 (https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=x376px6#T=C),
the large lion flag from the Royal Knights collection. Bricklink says it's
only in one set, Royal Knight's Castle, and I know I never had that set (waaaay
too expensive for my parents to buy).

Does anyone know where it might be in another set? I can't find it anywhere,
but obviously I've got it. I want to say it was an individual mini fig, sold
with maybe a horse and the red lion cape (which also says it's only in one
set).

Post an image of the flag, front and back, in Catalog Identification. Maybe you
have a different flag than the one you think you have.

To check it's size properly in studs, for measuring it, simply place it on
a LEGO baseplate and photograph it.

It's pretty easy to properly identify it and validate that it's a genuine
LEGO element.

Cheers ...

ghyde

I already verified that it's the same size and coloring. It's the same
flag as listed in the catalog.

That looks like yellowing due to age or interaction with chemicals present in
the environment. Unfortunately I don't know how you would clean that, but
perhaps someone on the forums will see this post and help you out with some information.
It might also be the lighting has an effect on the colors picked up in the flag.

For future reference it's easy to add parts using the "Add macro"
button when editing your post, the part above would look like the below macro
I've added to this post, reply to this and look at how the forum software
inserts it to get a better understanding. For best results, use the "Add
macro" button, as it will show colors that a part has available for it, and
color information stops the error you will get when trying to add parts without
using the "Add macro" button:

x376px6 Cloth Flag 8 x 5 Wave with Royal Knights Lion Head on Red and White Background Pattern
Parts: Cloth {White}

Cheers ...

ghyde

Author:

eritas

Posted:

Jan 9, 2024 16:25

Subject:

Re: Flag in another set?

Viewed:

34 times

Topic:

In Inventories, ghyde writes:

In Inventories, eritas writes:

I already verified that it's the same size and coloring. It's the same
flag as listed in the catalog.

Author:

ghyde

Posted:

Jan 7, 2024 16:47

Subject:

Re: Flag in another set?

Viewed:

39 times

Topic:

In Inventories, eritas writes:

Author:

eritas

Posted:

Jan 7, 2024 14:42

Subject:

Re: Flag in another set?

Viewed:

49 times

Topic:

What other set in the series did you have?

Right, I'm aware of the other sets in that theme, but that doesn't really
matter since none of them came with the large flag. I had King's Carriage,
Skeleton Surprise, and Royal Drawbridge.

Author:

crazylegoman

Posted:

Jan 7, 2024 13:14

Subject:

Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 75366-5

Viewed:

24 times

Topic:

In Inventories Requests, lksk writes:

Please make changes to the following inventory:

75366-5 (Inv) Advent Calendar 2023, Star Wars (Day 4) - Pit Droid in Holiday Outfit
1 Part, 1 Minifigure, 2023
Sets: Holiday & Event: Advent Sub-Set: Star Wars

* Add 1 Part 4733 Dark Bluish Gray Brick, Modified 1 x 1 with Studs on 4 Sides

Comments from Submitter:
Sealed package and build manual.

In such a small set that has a good photo in the catalog, you can clearly see
that there's only 1 DBG 4733. Are you saying that there is an extra one?

David

Author:

SezaR

Posted:

Jan 6, 2024 21:11

Subject:

Re: Flag in another set?

Viewed:

46 times

Topic:

In Inventories, eritas writes:

What other set in the series did you have?

This is the list to check:

https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?catType=S&catString=9.285

I can't find it anywhere,

but obviously I've got it. I want to say it was an individual mini fig, sold
with maybe a horse and the red lion cape (which also says it's only in one
set).

Author:

eritas

Posted:

Jan 6, 2024 21:05

Subject:

Flag in another set?

Viewed:

113 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Author:

Nubs_Select

Posted:

Jan 6, 2024 18:18

Subject:

Re: Set 1794 Instructions?

Viewed:

31 times

Topic:

these
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?I=1723-1#T=S&O={"iconly":0}
are its instructions

Author:

simon_dally

Posted:

Jan 6, 2024 18:04

Subject:

Set 1794 Instructions?

Viewed:

59 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Hi

I’ve been having a google and I’m pretty sure this set had instructions. It’s
marked as blank in BL. I don’t have them so I can’t be sure. Is there a way to
verify / update?

https://manuall.co.uk/lego-set-1794-castle-dragon-master-chariot/

https://worldbricks.com/en/instructions-number/1000/1700-1799/lego-set/1794-Dragon-Master-Chario.html

Simon

Author:

SezaR

Posted:

Dec 29, 2023 21:27

Subject:

Re: Castle 6059 Black Knights

Viewed:

45 times

Topic:

In Inventories, marlinjc writes:

It seems the plume feathers that are not used in the minifig are extra parts.
The extra plumes are seldom found with used sets found at sales. Keys in the
Harry Potter set are also confusing in this regard. Other parts like 1x1 round
plates come together and the unused ones are considered extra parts. It does
not seem right that a castle must be listed as incomplete if an unused plume
is not included.

It can be listed as complete per definition of used complete set:

Complete - Set contains all parts necessary to build all of the models
(including alternate models) in the instructions but does not have to contain
the original box/packaging and/or extra parts. If the set is missing instructions,
the description must list this. If the set did not come with instructions then
the set should include all parts listed in the picture inventory which is located
on the box or bucket. The set must include all original stickers used on the
model either still on the sticker sheet or applied.

https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=102#:~:text=Complete%20%2D%20Contents%20are%20brand%20new,)%20and%20original%20box%2Fpackaging.

This definition does not say "Set contains all parts in the regular
or alternate section".
If the plumes in a castle set are not used in any alternate model, the set can
be listed complete without them.

This is especially true of black plumes.

In Inventories, Zab3uk75 writes:

Hi, can any one confirm the head gear plumes in this set.
The inventory (Bricklink) shows
Plume feather small 4502a x 1
plume feather large 4502c x 1

The instructions show neither of these (perhaps I have missed them) but does
show
plume feather triple 4502b

Thanks for your help.

Author:

marlinjc

Posted:

Dec 29, 2023 19:22

Subject:

Re: Castle 6059 Black Knights

Viewed:

50 times

Topic:

Author:

SylvainLS

Posted:

Dec 28, 2023 13:42

Subject:

Re: Castle 6059 Black Knights

Viewed:

38 times

Topic:

6059-1 (Inv) Knight's Stronghold
206 Parts, 5 Minifigures, 1990
Sets: Castle: Black Knights

In Inventories, Zab3uk75 writes:

It is used in a minifigure:

Minifig No: cas173 Name: Breastplate - Armor over Black, Black Helmet, Dark Gray Visor, Blue 3-Feather Plume

cas173 (Inv) Breastplate - Armor over Black, Black Helmet, Dark Gray Visor, Blue 3-Feather Plume
Minifigures: Castle: Black Falcons

Use the “break minifigure” option to show parts that are used in minifigures
to the inventory.

Now, for the usual question of why the other plumes are in Regular while they
are not used to build the set:

The plumes came together on a sprue:

4502 (Inv) Minifigure, Plume / Feather Wheel, 3 on Sprue
Parts: Minifigure, Headgear Accessory

so the sprue should be in Regular.
But as one is already in a minifigure, the sprue is broken and two remaining
plumes go to Regular too.

Author:

Nubs_Select

Posted:

Dec 28, 2023 13:40

Subject:

Re: Castle 6059 Black Knights

Viewed:

30 times

Topic:

Yes the full plume wheel is in the set. It has to be taken apart as 1 is needed
for the figure so the rest are normal parts

Author:

Zab3uk75

Posted:

Dec 28, 2023 13:30

Subject:

Castle 6059 Black Knights

Viewed:

104 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Author:

SylvainLS

Posted:

Dec 14, 2023 14:56

Subject:

Re: BrickLink vs. Rebrickable Discrepancies

Viewed:

31 times

Topic:

In Inventories, qwertyboy writes:

In Inventories, SDF_Bricks writes:

Well, here is one example. For set 7649 Mars Mission, Part 61485 shows up in

WHITE on Rebrickable, and in BLACK on BrickLink

Well, this is a turntable base:

61485 Turntable 4 x 4 Square Base, Locking
Parts: Turntable {Black}

It is used with a top:

60474 Plate, Round 4 x 4 with Hole
Parts: Plate, Round {White}

Could it be that Rebrickable shows white on the assembly of the two? Like:

60474c01 (Inv) Turntable 4 x 4 x 2/3 with Black Square Base, Free-Spinning (60474 / 61485)
Parts: Turntable {White}

(which is in the "alternate items" on the inventory for your set).

“Counterpart,” not “Alternate”

Rebrickable (wrongly) has the base in White (and I don’t think they do assemblies/counterparts
there).
Brickset (which has this inventory from LEGO) has it in Black, like BL.

I think this is just that OP stumbled upon an inventory with errors on Rebrickable.
They have a forum there too where I guess this can be discussed.

Author:

qwertyboy

Posted:

Dec 14, 2023 13:33

Subject:

Re: BrickLink vs. Rebrickable Discrepancies

Viewed:

35 times

Topic:

In Inventories, SDF_Bricks writes:

Well, here is one example. For set 7649 Mars Mission, Part 61485 shows up in

WHITE on Rebrickable, and in BLACK on BrickLink

Well, this is a turntable base:

61485 Turntable 4 x 4 Square Base, Locking
Parts: Turntable {Black}

It is used with a top:

60474 Plate, Round 4 x 4 with Hole
Parts: Plate, Round {White}

Could it be that Rebrickable shows white on the assembly of the two? Like:

60474c01 (Inv) Turntable 4 x 4 x 2/3 with Black Square Base, Free-Spinning (60474 / 61485)
Parts: Turntable {White}

(which is in the "alternate items" on the inventory for your set).

Niek.

Author:

SDF_Bricks

Posted:

Dec 14, 2023 11:58

Subject:

Re: BrickLink vs. Rebrickable Discrepancies

Viewed:

37 times

Topic:

Well, here is one example. For set 7649 Mars Mission, Part 61485 shows up in

WHITE on Rebrickable, and in BLACK on BrickLink

I've seen cases where the part is missing completely from Rebrickable.

Also, Rebrickable now shows the extra parts (which Lego catalogs never do).

Author:

hpoort

Posted:

Dec 14, 2023 09:08

Subject:

Re: BrickLink vs. Rebrickable Discrepancies

Viewed:

56 times

Topic:

In Inventories, SDF_Bricks writes:

I often use Rebrickable to check inventories as they have a nice 'view'
where parts are shown large and easy to identify. I have not found a similar
view in Bricklink.
Lately however, I noticed there are discrepancies between the two systems. I
was under the impression these were from the same source, but apparently not.
Anyone has info on this issue?

Thank You

They are not from the same source.

Inventories on Rebrickable are taken directly from LEGO, which means they contain
the inventory as reported by LEGO, which may not be the same as was actually
shipped out and which does not cater for all variants that Bricklink distinguishes
(but may distinguish variants that are considered as the same on Bricklink).

Inventories on Bricklink are (nowadays) pre-filled from the same source of LEGO,
but are always manually checked and verified against what was actually packed.
The Bricklink inventories are also amended by distinguishing variants, counting
the extras (like most small parts), alternates (like different variants) and
counterparts (like stickers applied on parts, or wheel-tire assemblies).

Also, please keep in mind that although LEGO's part numbers (design ids)
are used on multiple platforms, the numbering of variants and decorated parts
may differ from platform to platform.

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Dec 14, 2023 03:36

Subject:

Re: BrickLink vs. Rebrickable Discrepancies

Viewed:

51 times

Topic:

In Inventories, SDF_Bricks writes:

What sort of discrepancies? Part variations? Missing parts? Modern or vintage
sets?

Author:

SDF_Bricks

Posted:

Dec 14, 2023 03:25

Subject:

BrickLink vs. Rebrickable Discrepancies

Viewed:

124 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Author:

jennnifer

Posted:

Dec 10, 2023 10:07

Subject:

Re: Gringotts Wizarding Bank

Viewed:

41 times

Topic:

In Inventories, simonrjensen writes:

Hasn't it taken very long with inventory approval on Gringotts Wizarding
Bank?
It's been over 3 months since it came on the market :o

Hello,

Yes, this time frame is very unusual. The member who was originally working on
this set and did the lion's share of the work was unable to finish it, unfortunately.

I am working on it now, and it is complete and waiting for approval. There's
a discrepancy in the data from LEGO which has to be worked out. The box says
4803 parts but only 4801 are actually used from what I found! It will be ready
as soon as this info is confirmed and the admin decide how to proceed.

Thanks,
~Jen

Author:

crazylegoman

Posted:

Dec 10, 2023 09:07

Subject:

Re: Gringotts Wizarding Bank

Viewed:

36 times

Topic:

In Inventories, simonrjensen writes:

Hasn't it taken very long with inventory approval on Gringotts Wizarding
Bank?
It's been over 3 months since it came on the market :o

It's a very large set, so if someone is working on the inventory, it will
take a while.

If you have the set, you can add the inventory here:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogInvAdd.asp?viewType=S

David

Author:

simonrjensen

Posted:

Dec 10, 2023 07:40

Subject:

Gringotts Wizarding Bank

Viewed:

76 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Hasn't it taken very long with inventory approval on Gringotts Wizarding
Bank?
It's been over 3 months since it came on the market :o

Author:

jennnifer

Posted:

Dec 8, 2023 11:55

Subject:

Re: Change/Add inventory

Viewed:

26 times

Topic:

In Inventories, Gumguy529 writes:

To whom it may concern,

I am not able to get the add new inventory item form to work. It keeps giving
me an error message. I am trying to notify Bricklink that set 8158-1 is missing
a stickered part number and picture. It will not let me submit anything due
to errors in the processing of the forum submission. However there is no way
to fix the errors.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,

Steve

Yes, the forms are a bit tricky to figure out. If you would like to add a stickered
part to a set on BrickLink, here is a guide for the process:

How to Stickers:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/kdlqdrmu5u2gm7odvmn2a/How-to-Stickers.pdf?rlkey=zx9ohb9cyag6scheeo4fc80d3&dl=0

Feel free to reach out if you have more questions!
~Jen

Author:

Gumguy529

Posted:

Dec 8, 2023 11:07

Subject:

Change/Add inventory

Viewed:

45 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Author:

axaday

Posted:

Oct 31, 2023 05:38

Subject:

Re: Is it possible to do the reverse of Part Out?

Viewed:

56 times

Topic:

In Inventories, EhMeh writes:

I have a lot of bulk Lego I was going through and inventorying, sorting for ease
of use. I’m nearly finished doing that, and I’m to the point where I want to
easily put some of these sets together. I had assumed (likely foolishly) that
I would be able to do the reverse of “Part Out” based on my inventory - ex: I
choose a set that I have a specific item for that only comes in one set, I click
it, it says what parts it contains - is there any way to directly cross reference
that with the inventory I have in my parts, and second, to move the parts from
Parts to Set as a collective?

Next, I had thought I could do this in my Wanted list, but when I put items into
the Wanted list by way of parts, the quantity I own does not show. Is there anywhere
it will show without individually clicking on every item?

Thanks!

You can enter -1 in the amount of a set you have to partout. I have never done
it and it feels kind of risky to me, but I have seen it mentioned as a solution
to your problem before.

Author:

ghyde

Posted:

Oct 20, 2023 15:55

Subject:

Re: string length in set 6462 Aerial Recovery

Viewed:

35 times

Topic:

In Help, cosmicray writes:

In Help, ghyde writes:

In Help, BondBricks writes:

Hello,

I wish to buy the string for set 6462 Aerial Recovery.
It is listed as:

x77a String, Cord Thin (Undetermined Length)

I see x77a listed with various lengths in the description. After someone tells
me length for set 6462 is it allowed to cut a longer string to that length.
OR does that mean I have ruined the string as a true Lego part?

How is it done to keep the set authentic? How to know proper string length?

Thanks,
Mark

There's confusion as to how many parts are in this actual set, which I believe
to be brickset's inventory not being complete:m

Brickset.com states on it's entry for this set: "According to the set
database, this set has 194 parts." but the official LEGO instructions contain
158 parts. The inventory from LEGO.com contains 158 parts. This suggests that
the inventory is 81.4% complete."

The entry on peeron.com states that the string is braided, 21L, and contains
end studs.

http://peeron.com/inv/sets/6462-1

If anyone has a sealed 6462 please verify what is in it. The only sets for sale
on BrickLink are all used, some incomplete.

Apart from the string length, the BrickLink inventory looks pretty accurate.

Cheers ...

ghyde

There are also some sets where the string is sold inclusive to a reel and hook.
So it could be listed like that.

Nita Rae

Perusing the inventory shows no official association listed for it. The whole
point is to try and determine what the string length in the original set was,
if at all possible.

String for sets back then likely came in either a cardboard box containing the
string or it was wound onto a flat piece of cardboard with tabs and with the
string inserted into notches or taped down. I seem to recall a few LEGO sets
that had the latter variety whenever string was included in a set.

You wouldn't happen to have any 6462 sets awaiting parting out would you?

Cheers ...

ghyde

Author:

randyf

Posted:

Oct 20, 2023 13:38

Subject:

Re: string length in set 6462 Aerial Recovery

Viewed:

30 times

Topic:

In Help, yorbrick writes:

Actually, the undetermined refers to the fact that no one has yet to correct
the inventory with the proper length of string that came with the set.

Ah yes. Even then, is there any guarantee the lengths are correct. I have a couple
of used strings from a set with a defined length and they are not exactly equal
to the length in the catalogue, both slightly different but over by up to 1cm.
Which suggests these either vary a little within production, have stretched in
use, were measured incorrectly or measured in a different way. It doesn't
matter for the function the string is used for, so not a big deal.

The strings will fluctuate around the number it should be according to LEGO inventory
data. So, a 50cm string will likely fall somewhere between 48.5cm to 51.5cm.
For our purposes, we use the number that TLG intended the set to be used with.

Author:

BondBricks

Posted:

Oct 20, 2023 06:43

Subject:

Re: string length in set 6462 Aerial Recovery

Viewed:

29 times

Topic:

Thankyou all for your comments.

I am thinking I will purchase a string so I can make it approximately 50cm in
length.
It would be nice if someone could update the length or part number in bricklink.
-
As far as the number of parts go in the set, ...well, I will stick with bricklink
information. This is a different topic from my question.

Thanks,
Mark

In Help, BondBricks writes:

Author:

paulvdb

Posted:

Oct 20, 2023 05:14

Subject:

Re: string length in set 6462 Aerial Recovery

Viewed:

32 times

Topic:

In Help, yorbrick writes:

Actually, the undetermined refers to the fact that no one has yet to correct
the inventory with the proper length of string that came with the set.

String lengths are not exact and can indeed vary a bit. I have some notes from
a few sets with x77ac30. The string lengths I found varied between 29.5 and 31
cm.

Author:

cosmicray

Posted:

Oct 20, 2023 04:56

Subject:

Re: string length in set 6462 Aerial Recovery

Viewed:

36 times

Topic:

In Help, ghyde writes:

In Help, BondBricks writes:

There are also some sets where the string is sold inclusive to a reel and hook.
So it could be listed like that.

Nita Rae

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Oct 20, 2023 03:49

Subject:

Re: string length in set 6462 Aerial Recovery

Viewed:

30 times

Topic:

Actually, the undetermined refers to the fact that no one has yet to correct
the inventory with the proper length of string that came with the set.

Author:

randyf

Posted:

Oct 19, 2023 18:21

Subject:

Re: string length in set 6462 Aerial Recovery

Viewed:

46 times

Topic:

In Help, yorbrick writes:

In Help, BondBricks writes:

Brickowl has it as 50cm long. So long as the longer string is genuine LEGO I
think you can use one that has been cut. After all, the strings were all originally
cut from a longer roll before being put into sets. I think the undetermined refers
to the length not being consistent over its production time. The length doesn't
really affect the play and it doesn't matter if it is off by a couple of
cm in production.

Actually, the undetermined refers to the fact that no one has yet to correct
the inventory with the proper length of string that came with the set.

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Oct 19, 2023 16:20

Subject:

Re: string length in set 6462 Aerial Recovery

Viewed:

43 times

Topic:

In Help, BondBricks writes:

Author:

ghyde

Posted:

Oct 19, 2023 15:50

Subject:

Re: string length in set 6462 Aerial Recovery

Viewed:

39 times

Topic:

In Help, BondBricks writes:

There's confusion as to how many parts are in this actual set, which I believe
to be brickset's inventory not being complete:

Brickset.com states on it's entry for this set: "According to the set
database, this set has 194 parts." but the official LEGO instructions contain
158 parts. The inventory from LEGO.com contains 158 parts. This suggests that
the inventory is 81.4% complete."

The entry on peeron.com states that the string is braided, 21L, and contains
end studs.

http://peeron.com/inv/sets/6462-1

If anyone has a sealed 6462 please verify what is in it. The only sets for sale
on BrickLink are all used, some incomplete.

Apart from the string length, the BrickLink inventory looks pretty accurate.

Cheers ...

ghyde

Author:

BondBricks

Posted:

Oct 19, 2023 15:20

Subject:

string length in set 6462 Aerial Recovery

Viewed:

99 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Author:

Ngtevan

Posted:

Oct 19, 2023 10:51

Subject:

Re: Consolidation Noob

Viewed:

34 times

Topic:

In Inventories, Stellar writes:

In Inventories, Ngtevan writes:

In Inventories, peregrinator writes:

In Inventories, Ngtevan writes:

I still don’t understand why it did that though. Why would it add the inventory
together and then keep that original inventory still active, basically duplicating
everything?

Did you use a 3rd party tool or did you do it through BrickLink?

I used BrickStore as it seemed the easiest to handle inventory. Jokes on me…

Did you use the box in the bottom of this page?

https://www.bricklink.com/invXML.asp

Top one is upload new things, bottom one is to update inventory items with lot
id.

PD: If you consolidated using BrickStore don't you have the original file
you downloaded?

I figured out what I did. Unfortunately I had to go through an recount the ones
I cataloged that day. Not a huge deal...just happened to be the 1x1 rounds so
it was kind of obnoxious. Either way...I learned. haha

Author:

Stellar

Posted:

Oct 18, 2023 08:29

Subject:

Re: Consolidation Noob

Viewed:

43 times

Topic:

In Inventories, Ngtevan writes:

In Inventories, peregrinator writes:

In Inventories, Ngtevan writes:

I still don’t understand why it did that though. Why would it add the inventory
together and then keep that original inventory still active, basically duplicating
everything?

Did you use a 3rd party tool or did you do it through BrickLink?

I used BrickStore as it seemed the easiest to handle inventory. Jokes on me…

Author:

Ngtevan

Posted:

Oct 18, 2023 08:16

Subject:

Re: Consolidation Noob

Viewed:

35 times

Topic:

In Inventories, peregrinator writes:

In Inventories, Ngtevan writes:

I still don’t understand why it did that though. Why would it add the inventory
together and then keep that original inventory still active, basically duplicating
everything?

Did you use a 3rd party tool or did you do it through BrickLink?

I used BrickStore as it seemed the easiest to handle inventory. Jokes on me…

Author:

peregrinator

Posted:

Oct 18, 2023 08:10

Subject:

Re: Consolidation Noob

Viewed:

40 times

Topic:

In Inventories, Ngtevan writes:

I still don’t understand why it did that though. Why would it add the inventory
together and then keep that original inventory still active, basically duplicating
everything?

Did you use a 3rd party tool or did you do it through BrickLink?

Author:

Ngtevan

Posted:

Oct 18, 2023 08:01

Subject:

Re: Consolidation Noob

Viewed:

52 times

Topic:

In Inventories, Brickwilbo writes:

In Inventories, Ngtevan writes:

So, I tried consolidating my inventory only to now have both lot ids listed and
the inventory is now off. Is there any way of back tracking to the inventory
before the consolidation?

Not, unless you've downloaded your inventory as backup.
https://www.bricklink.com/invExcel.asp

Of course I didn’t. So in order to override everything. I would need to pull
my Bricklink inventory on Brickstore, change the quantities and update. Alright.
Well, atleast this happened early on instead of later down the road.

I still don’t understand why it did that though. Why would it add the inventory
together and then keep that original inventory still active, basically duplicating
everything?

Author:

Brickwilbo

Posted:

Oct 18, 2023 05:35

Subject:

Re: Consolidation Noob

Viewed:

39 times

Topic:

In Inventories, Ngtevan writes:

So, I tried consolidating my inventory only to now have both lot ids listed and
the inventory is now off. Is there any way of back tracking to the inventory
before the consolidation?

Not, unless you've downloaded your inventory as backup.
https://www.bricklink.com/invExcel.asp

Author:

Ngtevan

Posted:

Oct 18, 2023 02:42

Subject:

Consolidation Noob

Viewed:

112 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

So, I tried consolidating my inventory only to now have both lot ids listed and
the inventory is now off. Is there any way of back tracking to the inventory
before the consolidation?

Author:

Nubs_Select

Posted:

Oct 12, 2023 13:20

Subject:

Re: 77013 inventory mistake

Viewed:

29 times

Topic: