Discussion Forum: Messages by TheBrickGuys (13284)
Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full      Show Messages: All | Without Replies

 Author: TheBrickGuys View Messages Posted By TheBrickGuys
 Posted: Feb 6, 2024 18:40
 Subject: Re: Howt to enable onsite payment?
 Viewed: 29 times
 Topic: Technical Issues
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
  AI: “Hi, I’m Bricky, your BrickLink assistant!  Would you like some help?”
User: “I want open a shop on BrickLink.”
AI: “Go to this address (link to halucinated address)”
User: “But it doesn’t work!”
AI: “Sorry, I meant this address (link to eBay)”
User: “But that’s eBay! I want BrickLink”
AI: “Oops, here’s the good one (link to BlinkRing, the club of blinkers aficionados)”
User: “Oh, I give up.”
AI: “Happy to have helped you!  See you soon


Works for me!! Less competition!!!

Jim
 Author: TheBrickGuys View Messages Posted By TheBrickGuys
 Posted: Jan 29, 2024 21:43
 Subject: Re: New Parts
 Viewed: 52 times
 Topic: Buying
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
In Buying, infinibrix writes:
  In Buying, TheBrickGuys writes:
  You are talking about not getting upset if you received a couple of pieces here
and there being stacked together in an order but it appears you didnt fully read
the entire post before responding. The original post does not complain about
a couple of pieces being staked, he stated the ALL the pieces were stacked.

There is a BIG difference between a couple of pieces verses all new pieces being
stacked.

Jim.

Thanks for chiming in but you actually didn't read the full context of my
own post either as it was directed towards yorbrick not the OP. I already stated
that I didn't fully approve of stacked bricks and so I don't take issue
with whatever complaints the op has over how they received their parts. It's
more directed at Yorbricks overly pedantic "stacking for 5 seconds" comment
along with his many other past comments where he obsessively appears to enjoy
correcting people and re-iterating the rules back to them regardless of how necessary/minor
the subject matter!

Ah, I see. Makes more sense.
 Author: TheBrickGuys View Messages Posted By TheBrickGuys
 Posted: Jan 29, 2024 10:44
 Subject: Re: New Parts
 Viewed: 54 times
 Topic: Buying
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
You are talking about not getting upset if you received a couple of pieces here
and there being stacked together in an order but it appears you didnt fully read
the entire post before responding. The original post does not complain about
a couple of pieces being staked, he stated the ALL the pieces were stacked.

There is a BIG difference between a couple of pieces verses all new pieces being
stacked.

Jim.
 Author: TheBrickGuys View Messages Posted By TheBrickGuys
 Posted: Jan 27, 2024 11:17
 Subject: Re: *** The Gift Shop Now Open! *** (US Based)
 Viewed: 44 times
 Topic: New Stores
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
  
1) Buyer leaves positive feedback, but doesn’t change the order status from “Shipped”
2) Buyer leaves positive feedback and changes the status to “Received” thinking
that’s it. Fairly common, actually.
3) Buyer contacts seller thanking them for the LEGO and offers praise of service
and/or product, without changing the status from “Shipped” or “Received”.
4) Buyer and seller are in communication over an order issue, which concludes
with the buyer expressing complete satisfaction with the transaction, again without
bothering to change the status.

In short, there's a good many LEGO fans that simply don’t know, don’t
care or don’t care to know about 'order status duties’ Many just wish to
buy LEGO and that’s it. Which is fine. The changing of order status by the seller
just helps a vendor to clean things up a bit, to stay organized.



Good points. I think that after 30 days if a buyer has not changed the order
status to "Complete" then they probably will fall under the category
'dont care' and will not care if the seller changes the status to complete.

Jim
 Author: TheBrickGuys View Messages Posted By TheBrickGuys
 Posted: Jan 27, 2024 10:58
 Subject: Re: Gummy Spam Poll ... Round 2
 Viewed: 39 times
 Topic: General
View Message
View
Cancel Message
Cancel
Reply to Message
Reply
E) allow Zero Feedback Members Limited Forum Access that is visible to
Moderators Only and does not post publicly.

Then the moderators could release posts to the public once they see they are
not spam. It would be great if they could then have control to, in a sense, "Unlock"
their activity after a period of time where it becomes obvious to them that the
poster is not a spammer and then their posts would no longer need to be subject
to their approval.

Jim

Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More