| Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies| Author: | kittybrickz  | | Posted: | Jan 22, 2024 15:51 | | Subject: | part out inventory | | Viewed: | 77 times | | Topic: | Inventories | | Status: | Open | |
| Hi!
I read somewhere that users can submit an inventory list for a set, how do I
go about that?
Have an epic day!
|
| Author: | randyf | | Posted: | Jan 19, 2024 13:56 | | Subject: | Re: gs014 includes weapons? | | Viewed: | 59 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
| In Inventories, Steineflut writes:
| | Hello there,
any particular reason why gs014 includes his weapons? I just stumbled across
it and thought it was weird.
Thanks,
Nadine
|
It is a catalog inconsistency, and it isn't the only one. These may or may
not be dealt with in the future.
Cheers,
Randy
|
| Author: | yorbrick | | Posted: | Jan 19, 2024 10:07 | | Subject: | Re: gs014 includes weapons? | | Viewed: | 45 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
| In Inventories, Steineflut writes:
| | Hello there,
any particular reason why gs014 includes his weapons? I just stumbled across
it and thought it was weird.
Thanks,
Nadine
|
Aren't they meant to be tentacles, so part of the creature rather than discrete
weapons.
|
| Author: | Steineflut | | Posted: | Jan 19, 2024 09:59 | | Subject: | gs014 includes weapons? | | Viewed: | 76 times | | Topic: | Inventories | | Status: | Open | |
| Hello there,
any particular reason why gs014 includes his weapons? I just stumbled across
it and thought it was weird.
Thanks,
Nadine
|
| Author: | Turez | | Posted: | Jan 16, 2024 14:59 | | Subject: | Re: Inventory change for set 8877 | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
| In Catalog Requests, s.j.stegeman writes:
| | Item 32140 is incorrectly in the inventory of set 8877. This should be part 32526,
the amount (4) is correct. See page 26-27 and 51-52 of the instruction booklet
of this set
|
Please see https://www.bricklink.com/messageThread.asp?ID=270161
I have added a note to the inventory that the instructions show a wrong part.
|
| Author: | s.j.stegeman | | Posted: | Jan 16, 2024 13:55 | | Subject: | Inventory change for set 8877 | | Viewed: | 52 times | | Topic: | Inventories | | Status: | Open | |
| Item 32140 is incorrectly in the inventory of set 8877. This should be part 32526,
the amount (4) is correct. See page 26-27 and 51-52 of the instruction booklet
of this set
|
| Author: | goldknight | | Posted: | Jan 12, 2024 09:42 | | Subject: | Re: Due to the upcoming variants merge do you... | | Viewed: | 60 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
| In Inventories, 1977_mauro writes:
| | ...still will differentiate the merged variants using the comment field?
Choose:
a) yes
b) no
c) not sure yet
Keep in mind that it won't be visible anymore in the old set inventories
which variant has been used.
Thanks Mauro
|
Yes!!!!
|
 |
| Author: | zorbanj | | Posted: | Jan 12, 2024 09:24 | | Subject: | Re: Due to the upcoming variants merge do you... | | Viewed: | 50 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
| b) No
Most sales of variants are driven by the inventories, which in turn populate
buyer want lists. If the variants aren't going to be in the inventories,
there is no point in differentiating them.
I'll keep what I currently have separated and try to send the same variant
for an order, but once I run out that's it. My shop is small and I cannot
charge the premium prices needed to justify the additional labor of continuing
to sort these to service for the vintage collector/restorer market.
In Inventories, 1977_mauro writes:
| | ...still will differentiate the merged variants using the comment field?
Choose:
a) yes
b) no
c) not sure yet
Keep in mind that it won't be visible anymore in the old set inventories
which variant has been used.
Thanks Mauro
|
|
|
| Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Jan 12, 2024 08:55 | | Subject: | Re: Due to the upcoming variants merge do you... | | Viewed: | 47 times | | Topic: | Inventories | |
| In Inventories, 1977_mauro writes:
| | ...still will differentiate the merged variants using the comment field?
Choose:
a) yes
b) no
c) not sure yet
Keep in mind that it won't be visible anymore in the old set inventories
which variant has been used.
Thanks Mauro
|
Yes, I do plan on listing the different molds whenever possible. However, I am
already in the habit of distinguishing between many variants in my Comments.
It's not a great system though and requires a significant amount of extra
work on my part. I wouldn't think it is a viable option for any other than
specialty or hobby shops like mine. It's a nightmare to check inventory
when you have multiple lots per part. I have to label everything and note how
many total lots I have so I don't mess up and grab the wrong lot when pulling
orders.
I also distinguish between 'good' used and play wear. So, I end up with
many lots for vintage parts. I would bet it is actually quite off-putting to
those trying to fill out wanted lists. I constantly worry that the Easy Buy system
is bringing buyers to my shop without reading the Comments before placing an
order.
Thanks,
~Jen
|
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
|
