BrickLink Discussion Forum

In Inventories, 1977_mauro writes:

...still will differentiate the merged variants using the comment field?

Choose:

a) yes
b) no
c) not sure yet

Keep in mind that it won't be visible anymore in the old set inventories
which variant has been used.

Thanks Mauro

I don't know.

I've never pulled the trigger so far and maybe I won't again, but it
is another moment where I'm thinking about just walking away.

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Jan 12, 2024 05:04

Subject:

Re: Due to the upcoming variants merge do you...

Viewed:

53 times

Topic:

In Inventories, 1977_mauro writes:

No. I think such comments might confuse and possibly put off some buyers. The
a, b, c type variants only really exist because they were catalogued here. If
they are no longer catalogued here then adding a comment that you will get a
'b' variant will be lost on many buyers and may leave them wondering
what they will get. It really depends on which images are retained to show the
part once merged. Where vintage parts come from known sets, I think I will comment
as i do now on the date range or the set they came from, if those parts attract
a premium price.

Author:

Nubs_Select

Posted:

Jan 12, 2024 03:24

Subject:

Re: Due to the upcoming variants merge do you...

Viewed:

42 times

Topic:

most likely but not 100% certain but most likely will. Also Will try to comment
more in unseparated variants perhaps

Author:

coevorden01

Posted:

Jan 12, 2024 03:18

Subject:

Re: Due to the upcoming variants merge do you...

Viewed:

42 times

Topic:

In Inventories, 1977_mauro writes:

Author:

wildchicken13

Posted:

Jan 12, 2024 03:12

Subject:

Re: Due to the upcoming variants merge do you...

Viewed:

46 times

Topic:

In Inventories, 1977_mauro writes:

B) No

Author:

1977_mauro

Posted:

Jan 12, 2024 03:07

Subject:

Due to the upcoming variants merge do you...

Viewed:

197 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Author:

ghyde

Posted:

Jan 10, 2024 14:09

Subject:

Re: Flag in another set?

Viewed:

35 times

Topic:

In Inventories, eritas writes:

In Inventories, ghyde writes:

In Inventories, eritas writes:

I have part x376px6 (https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=x376px6#T=C),
the large lion flag from the Royal Knights collection. Bricklink says it's
only in one set, Royal Knight's Castle, and I know I never had that set (waaaay
too expensive for my parents to buy).

Does anyone know where it might be in another set? I can't find it anywhere,
but obviously I've got it. I want to say it was an individual mini fig, sold
with maybe a horse and the red lion cape (which also says it's only in one
set).

Post an image of the flag, front and back, in Catalog Identification. Maybe you
have a different flag than the one you think you have.

To check it's size properly in studs, for measuring it, simply place it on
a LEGO baseplate and photograph it.

It's pretty easy to properly identify it and validate that it's a genuine
LEGO element.

Cheers ...

ghyde

I already verified that it's the same size and coloring. It's the same
flag as listed in the catalog.

That looks like yellowing due to age or interaction with chemicals present in
the environment. Unfortunately I don't know how you would clean that, but
perhaps someone on the forums will see this post and help you out with some information.
It might also be the lighting has an effect on the colors picked up in the flag.

For future reference it's easy to add parts using the "Add macro"
button when editing your post, the part above would look like the below macro
I've added to this post, reply to this and look at how the forum software
inserts it to get a better understanding. For best results, use the "Add
macro" button, as it will show colors that a part has available for it, and
color information stops the error you will get when trying to add parts without
using the "Add macro" button:

x376px6 Cloth Flag 8 x 5 Wave with Royal Knights Lion Head on Red and White Background Pattern
Parts: Cloth {White}

Cheers ...

ghyde

Author:

eritas

Posted:

Jan 9, 2024 16:25

Subject:

Re: Flag in another set?

Viewed:

34 times

Topic:

In Inventories, ghyde writes:

In Inventories, eritas writes:

I already verified that it's the same size and coloring. It's the same
flag as listed in the catalog.

Author:

ghyde

Posted:

Jan 7, 2024 16:47

Subject:

Re: Flag in another set?

Viewed:

39 times

Topic:

In Inventories, eritas writes:

Author:

eritas

Posted:

Jan 7, 2024 14:42

Subject:

Re: Flag in another set?

Viewed:

49 times

Topic:

What other set in the series did you have?

Right, I'm aware of the other sets in that theme, but that doesn't really
matter since none of them came with the large flag. I had King's Carriage,
Skeleton Surprise, and Royal Drawbridge.

Author:

crazylegoman

Posted:

Jan 7, 2024 13:14

Subject:

Re: Inventory Change Request for Set 75366-5

Viewed:

24 times

Topic:

In Inventories Requests, lksk writes:

Please make changes to the following inventory:

75366-5 (Inv) Advent Calendar 2023, Star Wars (Day 4) - Pit Droid in Holiday Outfit
1 Part, 1 Minifigure, 2023
Sets: Holiday & Event: Advent Sub-Set: Star Wars

* Add 1 Part 4733 Dark Bluish Gray Brick, Modified 1 x 1 with Studs on 4 Sides

Comments from Submitter:
Sealed package and build manual.

In such a small set that has a good photo in the catalog, you can clearly see
that there's only 1 DBG 4733. Are you saying that there is an extra one?

David

Author:

SezaR

Posted:

Jan 6, 2024 21:11

Subject:

Re: Flag in another set?

Viewed:

46 times

Topic:

In Inventories, eritas writes:

What other set in the series did you have?

This is the list to check:

https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?catType=S&catString=9.285

I can't find it anywhere,

but obviously I've got it. I want to say it was an individual mini fig, sold
with maybe a horse and the red lion cape (which also says it's only in one
set).

Author:

eritas

Posted:

Jan 6, 2024 21:05

Subject:

Flag in another set?

Viewed:

113 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Author:

Nubs_Select

Posted:

Jan 6, 2024 18:18

Subject:

Re: Set 1794 Instructions?

Viewed:

31 times

Topic:

these
https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?I=1723-1#T=S&O={"iconly":0}
are its instructions

Author:

simon_dally

Posted:

Jan 6, 2024 18:04

Subject:

Set 1794 Instructions?

Viewed:

59 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Hi

I’ve been having a google and I’m pretty sure this set had instructions. It’s
marked as blank in BL. I don’t have them so I can’t be sure. Is there a way to
verify / update?

https://manuall.co.uk/lego-set-1794-castle-dragon-master-chariot/

https://worldbricks.com/en/instructions-number/1000/1700-1799/lego-set/1794-Dragon-Master-Chario.html

Simon

Author:

SezaR

Posted:

Dec 29, 2023 21:27

Subject:

Re: Castle 6059 Black Knights

Viewed:

45 times

Topic:

In Inventories, marlinjc writes:

It seems the plume feathers that are not used in the minifig are extra parts.
The extra plumes are seldom found with used sets found at sales. Keys in the
Harry Potter set are also confusing in this regard. Other parts like 1x1 round
plates come together and the unused ones are considered extra parts. It does
not seem right that a castle must be listed as incomplete if an unused plume
is not included.

It can be listed as complete per definition of used complete set:

Complete - Set contains all parts necessary to build all of the models
(including alternate models) in the instructions but does not have to contain
the original box/packaging and/or extra parts. If the set is missing instructions,
the description must list this. If the set did not come with instructions then
the set should include all parts listed in the picture inventory which is located
on the box or bucket. The set must include all original stickers used on the
model either still on the sticker sheet or applied.

https://www.bricklink.com/help.asp?helpID=102#:~:text=Complete%20%2D%20Contents%20are%20brand%20new,)%20and%20original%20box%2Fpackaging.

This definition does not say "Set contains all parts in the regular
or alternate section".
If the plumes in a castle set are not used in any alternate model, the set can
be listed complete without them.

This is especially true of black plumes.

In Inventories, Zab3uk75 writes:

Hi, can any one confirm the head gear plumes in this set.
The inventory (Bricklink) shows
Plume feather small 4502a x 1
plume feather large 4502c x 1

The instructions show neither of these (perhaps I have missed them) but does
show
plume feather triple 4502b

Thanks for your help.

Author:

marlinjc

Posted:

Dec 29, 2023 19:22

Subject:

Re: Castle 6059 Black Knights

Viewed:

50 times

Topic:

Author:

SylvainLS

Posted:

Dec 28, 2023 13:42

Subject:

Re: Castle 6059 Black Knights

Viewed:

38 times

Topic:

6059-1 (Inv) Knight's Stronghold
206 Parts, 5 Minifigures, 1990
Sets: Castle: Black Knights

In Inventories, Zab3uk75 writes:

It is used in a minifigure:

Minifig No: cas173 Name: Breastplate - Armor over Black, Black Helmet, Dark Gray Visor, Blue 3-Feather Plume

cas173 (Inv) Breastplate - Armor over Black, Black Helmet, Dark Gray Visor, Blue 3-Feather Plume
Minifigures: Castle: Black Falcons

Use the “break minifigure” option to show parts that are used in minifigures
to the inventory.

Now, for the usual question of why the other plumes are in Regular while they
are not used to build the set:

The plumes came together on a sprue:

4502 (Inv) Minifigure, Plume / Feather Wheel, 3 on Sprue
Parts: Minifigure, Headgear Accessory

so the sprue should be in Regular.
But as one is already in a minifigure, the sprue is broken and two remaining
plumes go to Regular too.

Author:

Nubs_Select

Posted:

Dec 28, 2023 13:40

Subject:

Re: Castle 6059 Black Knights

Viewed:

30 times

Topic:

Yes the full plume wheel is in the set. It has to be taken apart as 1 is needed
for the figure so the rest are normal parts

Author:

Zab3uk75

Posted:

Dec 28, 2023 13:30

Subject:

Castle 6059 Black Knights

Viewed:

104 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Author:

SylvainLS

Posted:

Dec 14, 2023 14:56

Subject:

Re: BrickLink vs. Rebrickable Discrepancies

Viewed:

31 times

Topic:

In Inventories, qwertyboy writes:

In Inventories, SDF_Bricks writes:

Well, here is one example. For set 7649 Mars Mission, Part 61485 shows up in

WHITE on Rebrickable, and in BLACK on BrickLink

Well, this is a turntable base:

61485 Turntable 4 x 4 Square Base, Locking
Parts: Turntable {Black}

It is used with a top:

60474 Plate, Round 4 x 4 with Hole
Parts: Plate, Round {White}

Could it be that Rebrickable shows white on the assembly of the two? Like:

60474c01 (Inv) Turntable 4 x 4 x 2/3 with Black Square Base, Free-Spinning (60474 / 61485)
Parts: Turntable {White}

(which is in the "alternate items" on the inventory for your set).

“Counterpart,” not “Alternate”

Rebrickable (wrongly) has the base in White (and I don’t think they do assemblies/counterparts
there).
Brickset (which has this inventory from LEGO) has it in Black, like BL.

I think this is just that OP stumbled upon an inventory with errors on Rebrickable.
They have a forum there too where I guess this can be discussed.

Author:

qwertyboy

Posted:

Dec 14, 2023 13:33

Subject:

Re: BrickLink vs. Rebrickable Discrepancies

Viewed:

35 times

Topic:

In Inventories, SDF_Bricks writes:

Well, here is one example. For set 7649 Mars Mission, Part 61485 shows up in

WHITE on Rebrickable, and in BLACK on BrickLink

Well, this is a turntable base:

61485 Turntable 4 x 4 Square Base, Locking
Parts: Turntable {Black}

It is used with a top:

60474 Plate, Round 4 x 4 with Hole
Parts: Plate, Round {White}

Could it be that Rebrickable shows white on the assembly of the two? Like:

60474c01 (Inv) Turntable 4 x 4 x 2/3 with Black Square Base, Free-Spinning (60474 / 61485)
Parts: Turntable {White}

(which is in the "alternate items" on the inventory for your set).

Niek.

Author:

SDF_Bricks

Posted:

Dec 14, 2023 11:58

Subject:

Re: BrickLink vs. Rebrickable Discrepancies

Viewed:

37 times

Topic:

Well, here is one example. For set 7649 Mars Mission, Part 61485 shows up in

WHITE on Rebrickable, and in BLACK on BrickLink

I've seen cases where the part is missing completely from Rebrickable.

Also, Rebrickable now shows the extra parts (which Lego catalogs never do).

Author:

hpoort

Posted:

Dec 14, 2023 09:08

Subject:

Re: BrickLink vs. Rebrickable Discrepancies

Viewed:

56 times

Topic:

In Inventories, SDF_Bricks writes:

I often use Rebrickable to check inventories as they have a nice 'view'
where parts are shown large and easy to identify. I have not found a similar
view in Bricklink.
Lately however, I noticed there are discrepancies between the two systems. I
was under the impression these were from the same source, but apparently not.
Anyone has info on this issue?

Thank You

They are not from the same source.

Inventories on Rebrickable are taken directly from LEGO, which means they contain
the inventory as reported by LEGO, which may not be the same as was actually
shipped out and which does not cater for all variants that Bricklink distinguishes
(but may distinguish variants that are considered as the same on Bricklink).

Inventories on Bricklink are (nowadays) pre-filled from the same source of LEGO,
but are always manually checked and verified against what was actually packed.
The Bricklink inventories are also amended by distinguishing variants, counting
the extras (like most small parts), alternates (like different variants) and
counterparts (like stickers applied on parts, or wheel-tire assemblies).

Also, please keep in mind that although LEGO's part numbers (design ids)
are used on multiple platforms, the numbering of variants and decorated parts
may differ from platform to platform.

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Dec 14, 2023 03:36

Subject:

Re: BrickLink vs. Rebrickable Discrepancies

Viewed:

51 times

Topic:

In Inventories, SDF_Bricks writes:

What sort of discrepancies? Part variations? Missing parts? Modern or vintage
sets?

Author:

SDF_Bricks

Posted:

Dec 14, 2023 03:25

Subject:

BrickLink vs. Rebrickable Discrepancies

Viewed:

124 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Author:

jennnifer

Posted:

Dec 10, 2023 10:07

Subject:

Re: Gringotts Wizarding Bank

Viewed:

41 times

Topic:

In Inventories, simonrjensen writes:

Hasn't it taken very long with inventory approval on Gringotts Wizarding
Bank?
It's been over 3 months since it came on the market :o

Hello,

Yes, this time frame is very unusual. The member who was originally working on
this set and did the lion's share of the work was unable to finish it, unfortunately.

I am working on it now, and it is complete and waiting for approval. There's
a discrepancy in the data from LEGO which has to be worked out. The box says
4803 parts but only 4801 are actually used from what I found! It will be ready
as soon as this info is confirmed and the admin decide how to proceed.

Thanks,
~Jen

Author:

crazylegoman

Posted:

Dec 10, 2023 09:07

Subject:

Re: Gringotts Wizarding Bank

Viewed:

36 times

Topic:

In Inventories, simonrjensen writes:

Hasn't it taken very long with inventory approval on Gringotts Wizarding
Bank?
It's been over 3 months since it came on the market :o

It's a very large set, so if someone is working on the inventory, it will
take a while.

If you have the set, you can add the inventory here:
https://www.bricklink.com/catalogInvAdd.asp?viewType=S

David

Author:

simonrjensen

Posted:

Dec 10, 2023 07:40

Subject:

Gringotts Wizarding Bank

Viewed:

76 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Hasn't it taken very long with inventory approval on Gringotts Wizarding
Bank?
It's been over 3 months since it came on the market :o

Author:

jennnifer

Posted:

Dec 8, 2023 11:55

Subject:

Re: Change/Add inventory

Viewed:

26 times

Topic:

In Inventories, Gumguy529 writes:

To whom it may concern,

I am not able to get the add new inventory item form to work. It keeps giving
me an error message. I am trying to notify Bricklink that set 8158-1 is missing
a stickered part number and picture. It will not let me submit anything due
to errors in the processing of the forum submission. However there is no way
to fix the errors.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,

Steve

Yes, the forms are a bit tricky to figure out. If you would like to add a stickered
part to a set on BrickLink, here is a guide for the process:

How to Stickers:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/kdlqdrmu5u2gm7odvmn2a/How-to-Stickers.pdf?rlkey=zx9ohb9cyag6scheeo4fc80d3&dl=0

Feel free to reach out if you have more questions!
~Jen

Author:

Gumguy529

Posted:

Dec 8, 2023 11:07

Subject:

Change/Add inventory

Viewed:

45 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Author:

axaday

Posted:

Oct 31, 2023 05:38

Subject:

Re: Is it possible to do the reverse of Part Out?

Viewed:

56 times

Topic:

In Inventories, EhMeh writes:

I have a lot of bulk Lego I was going through and inventorying, sorting for ease
of use. I’m nearly finished doing that, and I’m to the point where I want to
easily put some of these sets together. I had assumed (likely foolishly) that
I would be able to do the reverse of “Part Out” based on my inventory - ex: I
choose a set that I have a specific item for that only comes in one set, I click
it, it says what parts it contains - is there any way to directly cross reference
that with the inventory I have in my parts, and second, to move the parts from
Parts to Set as a collective?

Next, I had thought I could do this in my Wanted list, but when I put items into
the Wanted list by way of parts, the quantity I own does not show. Is there anywhere
it will show without individually clicking on every item?

Thanks!

You can enter -1 in the amount of a set you have to partout. I have never done
it and it feels kind of risky to me, but I have seen it mentioned as a solution
to your problem before.

Author:

ghyde

Posted:

Oct 20, 2023 15:55

Subject:

Re: string length in set 6462 Aerial Recovery

Viewed:

35 times

Topic:

In Help, cosmicray writes:

In Help, ghyde writes:

In Help, BondBricks writes:

Hello,

I wish to buy the string for set 6462 Aerial Recovery.
It is listed as:

x77a String, Cord Thin (Undetermined Length)

I see x77a listed with various lengths in the description. After someone tells
me length for set 6462 is it allowed to cut a longer string to that length.
OR does that mean I have ruined the string as a true Lego part?

How is it done to keep the set authentic? How to know proper string length?

Thanks,
Mark

There's confusion as to how many parts are in this actual set, which I believe
to be brickset's inventory not being complete:m

Brickset.com states on it's entry for this set: "According to the set
database, this set has 194 parts." but the official LEGO instructions contain
158 parts. The inventory from LEGO.com contains 158 parts. This suggests that
the inventory is 81.4% complete."

The entry on peeron.com states that the string is braided, 21L, and contains
end studs.

http://peeron.com/inv/sets/6462-1

If anyone has a sealed 6462 please verify what is in it. The only sets for sale
on BrickLink are all used, some incomplete.

Apart from the string length, the BrickLink inventory looks pretty accurate.

Cheers ...

ghyde

There are also some sets where the string is sold inclusive to a reel and hook.
So it could be listed like that.

Nita Rae

Perusing the inventory shows no official association listed for it. The whole
point is to try and determine what the string length in the original set was,
if at all possible.

String for sets back then likely came in either a cardboard box containing the
string or it was wound onto a flat piece of cardboard with tabs and with the
string inserted into notches or taped down. I seem to recall a few LEGO sets
that had the latter variety whenever string was included in a set.

You wouldn't happen to have any 6462 sets awaiting parting out would you?

Cheers ...

ghyde

Author:

randyf

Posted:

Oct 20, 2023 13:38

Subject:

Re: string length in set 6462 Aerial Recovery

Viewed:

30 times

Topic:

In Help, yorbrick writes:

Actually, the undetermined refers to the fact that no one has yet to correct
the inventory with the proper length of string that came with the set.

Ah yes. Even then, is there any guarantee the lengths are correct. I have a couple
of used strings from a set with a defined length and they are not exactly equal
to the length in the catalogue, both slightly different but over by up to 1cm.
Which suggests these either vary a little within production, have stretched in
use, were measured incorrectly or measured in a different way. It doesn't
matter for the function the string is used for, so not a big deal.

The strings will fluctuate around the number it should be according to LEGO inventory
data. So, a 50cm string will likely fall somewhere between 48.5cm to 51.5cm.
For our purposes, we use the number that TLG intended the set to be used with.

Author:

BondBricks

Posted:

Oct 20, 2023 06:43

Subject:

Re: string length in set 6462 Aerial Recovery

Viewed:

29 times

Topic:

Thankyou all for your comments.

I am thinking I will purchase a string so I can make it approximately 50cm in
length.
It would be nice if someone could update the length or part number in bricklink.
-
As far as the number of parts go in the set, ...well, I will stick with bricklink
information. This is a different topic from my question.

Thanks,
Mark

In Help, BondBricks writes:

Author:

paulvdb

Posted:

Oct 20, 2023 05:14

Subject:

Re: string length in set 6462 Aerial Recovery

Viewed:

32 times

Topic:

In Help, yorbrick writes:

Actually, the undetermined refers to the fact that no one has yet to correct
the inventory with the proper length of string that came with the set.

String lengths are not exact and can indeed vary a bit. I have some notes from
a few sets with x77ac30. The string lengths I found varied between 29.5 and 31
cm.

Author:

cosmicray

Posted:

Oct 20, 2023 04:56

Subject:

Re: string length in set 6462 Aerial Recovery

Viewed:

36 times

Topic:

In Help, ghyde writes:

In Help, BondBricks writes:

There are also some sets where the string is sold inclusive to a reel and hook.
So it could be listed like that.

Nita Rae

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Oct 20, 2023 03:49

Subject:

Re: string length in set 6462 Aerial Recovery

Viewed:

30 times

Topic:

Actually, the undetermined refers to the fact that no one has yet to correct
the inventory with the proper length of string that came with the set.

Author:

randyf

Posted:

Oct 19, 2023 18:21

Subject:

Re: string length in set 6462 Aerial Recovery

Viewed:

46 times

Topic:

In Help, yorbrick writes:

In Help, BondBricks writes:

Brickowl has it as 50cm long. So long as the longer string is genuine LEGO I
think you can use one that has been cut. After all, the strings were all originally
cut from a longer roll before being put into sets. I think the undetermined refers
to the length not being consistent over its production time. The length doesn't
really affect the play and it doesn't matter if it is off by a couple of
cm in production.

Actually, the undetermined refers to the fact that no one has yet to correct
the inventory with the proper length of string that came with the set.

Author:

yorbrick

Posted:

Oct 19, 2023 16:20

Subject:

Re: string length in set 6462 Aerial Recovery

Viewed:

43 times

Topic:

In Help, BondBricks writes:

Author:

ghyde

Posted:

Oct 19, 2023 15:50

Subject:

Re: string length in set 6462 Aerial Recovery

Viewed:

39 times

Topic:

In Help, BondBricks writes:

There's confusion as to how many parts are in this actual set, which I believe
to be brickset's inventory not being complete:

Brickset.com states on it's entry for this set: "According to the set
database, this set has 194 parts." but the official LEGO instructions contain
158 parts. The inventory from LEGO.com contains 158 parts. This suggests that
the inventory is 81.4% complete."

The entry on peeron.com states that the string is braided, 21L, and contains
end studs.

http://peeron.com/inv/sets/6462-1

If anyone has a sealed 6462 please verify what is in it. The only sets for sale
on BrickLink are all used, some incomplete.

Apart from the string length, the BrickLink inventory looks pretty accurate.

Cheers ...

ghyde

Author:

BondBricks

Posted:

Oct 19, 2023 15:20

Subject:

string length in set 6462 Aerial Recovery

Viewed:

99 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

Author:

Ngtevan

Posted:

Oct 19, 2023 10:51

Subject:

Re: Consolidation Noob

Viewed:

34 times

Topic:

In Inventories, Stellar writes:

In Inventories, Ngtevan writes:

In Inventories, peregrinator writes:

In Inventories, Ngtevan writes:

I still don’t understand why it did that though. Why would it add the inventory
together and then keep that original inventory still active, basically duplicating
everything?

Did you use a 3rd party tool or did you do it through BrickLink?

I used BrickStore as it seemed the easiest to handle inventory. Jokes on me…

Did you use the box in the bottom of this page?

https://www.bricklink.com/invXML.asp

Top one is upload new things, bottom one is to update inventory items with lot
id.

PD: If you consolidated using BrickStore don't you have the original file
you downloaded?

I figured out what I did. Unfortunately I had to go through an recount the ones
I cataloged that day. Not a huge deal...just happened to be the 1x1 rounds so
it was kind of obnoxious. Either way...I learned. haha

Author:

Stellar

Posted:

Oct 18, 2023 08:29

Subject:

Re: Consolidation Noob

Viewed:

43 times

Topic:

In Inventories, Ngtevan writes:

In Inventories, peregrinator writes:

In Inventories, Ngtevan writes:

I still don’t understand why it did that though. Why would it add the inventory
together and then keep that original inventory still active, basically duplicating
everything?

Did you use a 3rd party tool or did you do it through BrickLink?

I used BrickStore as it seemed the easiest to handle inventory. Jokes on me…

Author:

Ngtevan

Posted:

Oct 18, 2023 08:16

Subject:

Re: Consolidation Noob

Viewed:

35 times

Topic:

In Inventories, peregrinator writes:

In Inventories, Ngtevan writes:

I still don’t understand why it did that though. Why would it add the inventory
together and then keep that original inventory still active, basically duplicating
everything?

Did you use a 3rd party tool or did you do it through BrickLink?

I used BrickStore as it seemed the easiest to handle inventory. Jokes on me…

Author:

peregrinator

Posted:

Oct 18, 2023 08:10

Subject:

Re: Consolidation Noob

Viewed:

40 times

Topic:

In Inventories, Ngtevan writes:

I still don’t understand why it did that though. Why would it add the inventory
together and then keep that original inventory still active, basically duplicating
everything?

Did you use a 3rd party tool or did you do it through BrickLink?

Author:

Ngtevan

Posted:

Oct 18, 2023 08:01

Subject:

Re: Consolidation Noob

Viewed:

52 times

Topic:

In Inventories, Brickwilbo writes:

In Inventories, Ngtevan writes:

So, I tried consolidating my inventory only to now have both lot ids listed and
the inventory is now off. Is there any way of back tracking to the inventory
before the consolidation?

Not, unless you've downloaded your inventory as backup.
https://www.bricklink.com/invExcel.asp

Of course I didn’t. So in order to override everything. I would need to pull
my Bricklink inventory on Brickstore, change the quantities and update. Alright.
Well, atleast this happened early on instead of later down the road.

I still don’t understand why it did that though. Why would it add the inventory
together and then keep that original inventory still active, basically duplicating
everything?

Author:

Brickwilbo

Posted:

Oct 18, 2023 05:35

Subject:

Re: Consolidation Noob

Viewed:

39 times

Topic:

In Inventories, Ngtevan writes:

So, I tried consolidating my inventory only to now have both lot ids listed and
the inventory is now off. Is there any way of back tracking to the inventory
before the consolidation?

Not, unless you've downloaded your inventory as backup.
https://www.bricklink.com/invExcel.asp

Author:

Ngtevan

Posted:

Oct 18, 2023 02:42

Subject:

Consolidation Noob

Viewed:

112 times

Topic:

Status:

Open

So, I tried consolidating my inventory only to now have both lot ids listed and
the inventory is now off. Is there any way of back tracking to the inventory
before the consolidation?

Author:

Nubs_Select

Posted:

Oct 12, 2023 13:20

Subject:

Re: 77013 inventory mistake

Viewed:

29 times

Topic: