| Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Author: | Stellar | Posted: | Dec 14, 2021 06:10 | Subject: | Move chess storage to Set box? | Viewed: | 78 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | For: | Catalog Associate | Status: | Open | |
| [g=G678stor]
to
[g=G577stor]
to
[g=G574board]
to
And these weren't moved out of gear, maybe to Brick Assembly? As they are
glued... Just asking.
And these to Brick Assembly too? Or stay, IDK
[g=G572board]
|
|
Author: | Poncke | Posted: | Dec 6, 2021 05:34 | Subject: | 5489-1 Ultimate LEGO Vehicle Building Set | Viewed: | 73 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | For: | Catalog Associate | Status: | Open | |
| 5489-1 Ultimate LEGO Vehicle Building Set theme needs to change from Creator
to Bricks and More.
|
Author: | Poncke | Posted: | Dec 5, 2021 06:37 | Subject: | LEGO Bricks and More category missing | Viewed: | 98 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | For: | Catalog Associate | Status: | Open | |
| It seems there is a category missing on BL.
Bricks and More
There are LEGO boxes sold under this category
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Lego_themes
Bricks and More is a retired theme that was actual from 2009 to 2010
Can an Admin look into this and add it to the list of categories?
There are several sets offered on BL under the Creator category when in fact
they are Bricks and More.
|
|
Author: | SezaR | Posted: | Oct 30, 2021 22:12 | Subject: | add note | Viewed: | 65 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | For: | Catalog Associate | Status: | Open | |
| Please leave open for now until others or myself complete this.
I own an instructions dated 1977 but 3 out of 4 of the following sets are released
in 1976.
Please add note for instructions of
The instructions for this sets 154-1(version 1977), 156-2, 157-1 and 159-1 are
identical.
I need to find a copy of instructions dated 1976 but I believe it should be similar.
|
|
Author: | here4bricks614 | Posted: | Oct 27, 2021 12:45 | Subject: | 27 Rust Duplo Cows | Viewed: | 119 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | For: | Catalog Associate | Status: | Open | |
| 27 Rust on BL consists of parts that are both LEGO's 13 Red Orange and just
regular low-quality red parts.
The Duplo cows that are Dark Orange are most definitely not Dark Orange. Dark
Orange was introduced around 1994-95, not 1979, which reflects Red Orange's
release date as Fabuland heads. Despite the fact that this color is a bit of
a mess, BL Rust should be given to 13 Red Orange, and all Dark Orange Duplo Cows
(parts 4010pb01 and 4010px1) should be moved to Rust, along with all non-cow
"Rust" parts moved to "Red", perhaps with notes about color variation? I cannot
request this change from their catalog entry pages, so I'm doing it here.
No cow I've purchased under the "Dark Orange" color has ever turned out to
be said color, and sellers describe it as more of a "Rust" anyway, which is consistent
with the other "Rust" cows. Furthermore, BL entry photos of these cows, especially
in the case of 4010px1 show that those cows are far from being Dark Orange, and
are certainly Red Orange.
Official LEGO inventory data shows that non-cow "Rust" parts are 21 Bright Red/5
Red. No color exists that directly corresponds to 27 Rust. All inventories containing
"Rust" as an alternate to "Red" should be edited to remove the alternate "Rust"
parts, as official inventory data and information available about LEGO color
IDs show that there is no color that corresponds to BL Rust, similar to how Brittle
Blue is just a variant of Blue.
Changing all Duplo cows (4010pb01 and 4010px1) would help clean up Rust a bit
more, while also helping Dark Orange be a little more accurate in terms of a
release date. 13 Red Orange is one of those colors that doesn't exactly have
its own BL color, but making BL Rust correspond to LEGO Red Orange would help
solve that problem. Years of usage would be 1979-1997 after moving all non-cow
"Rust" parts to "Red" and moving all "Dark Orange" cows to "Rust".
This is 4010px1. Bricklink lists this color as only coming in Dark Orange, which
this obviously is not. Someone added a photo of the cow under the "Rust" color.
|
|
|
Author: | Abels_Bricks | Posted: | Oct 21, 2021 10:02 | Subject: | Pneumatic Pump 4701c01 | Viewed: | 80 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | For: | Catalog Associate | Status: | Open | |
| wondering if this item should be split into the 2 versions
Long stroke and short stroke.
regards
David
|
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | Oct 19, 2021 13:06 | Subject: | Possibly Add A Note | Viewed: | 127 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | For: | Catalog Associate | Status: | Open | |
| I've Noticed That
Has It Part Number On The Underside Of The Brim While
Has It Inside The Stud Holder (I Think That's What It Is Called)
Please Ignore The Pen I Used It To Keep Them At An Angle Where You Can Read The
Part Number
I Tried Looking If There Was A Catalog Change Forum To Request A Note To Be Added
But I Couldn't Find One So I Thought I Should Post It Here.
I Want To Add This Note As When I Only Look At 1 Of Them It's Difficult To
Figure out Which On It Is And I Think This Might Help Significantly With Identifying
If You Have The Correct One. It's Easy To Identify If You Only Have The One
With The Part Number On The Brim However If You Have The Other one And Don't
Know The Other One Has The Number On The Brim It Might Be Difficult To Separate
I Was Only Able To Check Several I Have On Hand So I Might Be Wrong About This
And Some Of
Might Not Have The Number On The Underside Of The Brim But Since
It A Smaller Release I Thought It Might All Be The Same But I Encourage More
Knowledgeable Members To Chime In If Possible
Thank you For Your Time!
-Jason
|
|
|
Author: | gvbricks | Posted: | Sep 22, 2021 00:40 | Subject: | 5005888 | Viewed: | 98 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | For: | Catalog Associate | Status: | Open | |
|
The additional notes ("There are 2 versions of this poster. The front image is
the same on both but the reverse printing creates either a red or blue lightsaber
when rolled up. The difference can be seen in the additional comparison image.")
are misleading.
There are three(!) versions of this poster:
The small one with size 25x33 cm and no reverse printing.
Two large ones with size 60x80 cm and red or blue reverse printing.
|
Author: | Stellar | Posted: | Sep 20, 2021 15:47 | Subject: | Split part 53540 from 30526 | Viewed: | 95 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | For: | Catalog Associate | Status: | Open | |
| Same as with other pins lately, please split this part, a bar does not fit the
right one 53540.
In the picture 30526 is on the left and 53540 is on the right.
|
|
|
Author: | Teup | Posted: | Sep 11, 2021 07:32 | Subject: | Can these please all be the same category? | Viewed: | 139 times | Topic: | Catalog Requests | For: | Catalog Associate | Status: | Open | |
| I'm trying to do some sorting here but I'm terribly confused with the
categorisation of these rounded corners these days. Can we please improve this
and have them all in the same category?
Is a 'slope curved'
Is a 'brick modified' (but it's the corner of a slope curved)
Is a 'brick round' (but it's the corner of a slope curved)
All of their non-corner versions are 'slope curved'. Please let's
have them all either in 'slope curved' on that basis, or in 'brick
round' on the basis of their base having a rounded site. No preference but
please let's make it consistent, thanks!
|
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
|