Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Re: Dimensions 10507 - mfav (174)  | [...] That's true if the stud size dimensions are accurate; but when something is really 1 x 1.4 but is labeled 1 x 1...not so much.
(51 months ago, Feb 27, 2020, to Catalog) |
| Re: Dimensions 10507 - mfav (174) | [...] It makes no sense to have stud size dimensions for anything in the dimensions field. Having some dimensions being mm and others being studs makes all of them useless. [...]
(51 months ago, Feb 27, 2020, to Catalog) |
| Dimensions 10507 - mfav (174) | Why is 10507 listed as 1x1 in studs? 10507 is x: 7.9mm y: 11.2mm z: 11.1mm making it 1 x 1.4 in studs. Is this just another one of those places of inconsistency madness?
(51 months ago, Feb 27, 2020, to Catalog) |
| Re: Yo StormBluser, for the roadmap? - mfav (174) | [...] There's a lot to consider. 1. should a piece be restricted to its original part number? If 3713 is superceded by 6590, which is superceded by 42798, should those [...]
(51 months ago, Feb 26, 2020, to Catalog) |
| Re: Yo StormBluser, for the roadmap? - mfav (174) | I did note there would be pain associated with the proposal. Thus the question mark in the title. We’re finally getting three asp pages rewritten, so maybe the logjam on the [...]
(51 months ago, Feb 26, 2020, to Catalog) |
| Yo StormBluser, for the roadmap? - mfav (174) | (URL) I know, there'll be pain with the renaming and whatnot, but it would be nice if all the axle holes on all the pieces were named consistently and were referred to in [...]
(51 months ago, Feb 25, 2020, to Catalog) |
| Re: Alternate Images (Rant) - mfav (174) | [...] For pity's sake. Can't BrickLink afford a ConstantContact or MailChimp account? I know, you're not the person to ask. This is a rhetorical question. ...and [...]
(51 months ago, Feb 17, 2020, to Catalog) |
| Re: Description standardization note - mfav (174) | [...] Aren't you the fella to talk to to get that changed, Mister Site Manager? [...] While that is undoubtedly true, it's not particularly helpful in any way. If [...]
(52 months ago, Feb 8, 2020, to Catalog) |
| Description standardization note - mfav (174) | It would be good for consistency in the catalog description if all instances of numbers were either integers or words, not arbitrarily some of each. So: Three eyeballs, Three [...]
(52 months ago, Feb 8, 2020, to Catalog) |
| Re: February Roadmap Project: Old and New - mfav (174) | [...] I'm content to let the mad geniuses of catalog control sort out the catalog. I'm just documenting the differences I can find in the handful of hats I have. Regardless [...]
(52 months ago, Feb 7, 2020, to Catalog) |
| Re: 3626cpb1788 Will Still Say Flesh - mfav (174) | [...] The problem is with cognition: Is this a Container or a Container Lid? Container 1 x 2 x 3 Lid ...is it a 1 x 2 x 3 container or is it a 1 x 2 x 3 lid? The tile example [...]
(52 months ago, Feb 3, 2020, to Colors) |
| Re: 3626cpb1788 Will Still Say Flesh - mfav (174) | I'd suggest, if you're going to "standardize" the conventions, please remove all the withs, withouts, ands, ons, throughs and other useless terms. Stick to nouns wherever [...]
(52 months ago, Feb 3, 2020, to Colors) |
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
