| Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Re: Dimensions 10507 - mfav (174)  | [...] That's true if the stud size dimensions are accurate; but when something is really 1 x 1.4 but is labeled 1 x 1...not so much.
(51 months ago, Feb 27, 2020, to Catalog) |
| Re: Dimensions 10507 - mfav (174) | [...] It makes no sense to have stud size dimensions for anything in the dimensions field. Having some dimensions being mm and others being studs makes all of them useless. [...]
(51 months ago, Feb 27, 2020, to Catalog) |
| Dimensions 10507 - mfav (174) | Why is 10507 listed as 1x1 in studs? 10507 is x: 7.9mm y: 11.2mm z: 11.1mm making it 1 x 1.4 in studs. Is this just another one of those places of inconsistency madness?
(51 months ago, Feb 27, 2020, to Catalog) |
| Re: Yo StormBluser, for the roadmap? - mfav (174) | [...] There's a lot to consider. 1. should a piece be restricted to its original part number? If 3713 is superceded by 6590, which is superceded by 42798, should those [...]
(51 months ago, Feb 26, 2020, to Catalog) |
| Re: Yo StormBluser, for the roadmap? - mfav (174) | I did note there would be pain associated with the proposal. Thus the question mark in the title. We’re finally getting three asp pages rewritten, so maybe the logjam on the [...]
(51 months ago, Feb 26, 2020, to Catalog) |
| Yo StormBluser, for the roadmap? - mfav (174) | (URL) I know, there'll be pain with the renaming and whatnot, but it would be nice if all the axle holes on all the pieces were named consistently and were referred to in [...]
(51 months ago, Feb 25, 2020, to Catalog) |
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|
|
